Ko je brži, AMD ili Intel - malo drugačiji pogled

segregator · 09.06.2008., 15:57

http://weblog.infoworld.com/yager/ar...tml?source=rss

Ako imate volje čitati, članak je malo duži

"AMD counters the gearhead-level speeds and feeds derived from synthetic benchmarks with IT-relevant load metrics. In Web transactions, virtualization, and parallel workloads, Quad-Core Opteron outperforms quad-core Xeon by margins of 9 to 16 percent. But there's a point worth noting: AMD scored these wins with a 2.3GHz CPU and 2MB of Level 3 cache. Intel lost out to AMD with quad-core Xeon CPUs running at 2.83GHz with 12MB of cache. The configuration differences between the two architectures give AMD what you call headroom. AMD is holding manufacturing process shrink, CPU clock speed, bigger cache, and additional cores as cards to play on IT's behalf when the time is right."

Gilbert5 · 09.06.2008., 16:50

Segre se opet bori sa vjetrenjačama

segregator · 09.06.2008., 16:55

Nisam ja majke mi, tip na slici uopće ne sliči na mene

Codiac · 09.06.2008., 20:11

onaj tko imalo cjeni lovu ce znati za svaku namjenu uzeti proc...

maX · 10.06.2008., 03:26

Citiraj:

Autor Gilbert5

Segre se opet bori sa vjetrenjačama

jbg, neki se nikad nece pomirit s istinom

Fleks · 10.06.2008., 03:35

Intel FTW

segregator · 10.06.2008., 08:16

Citiraj:

Autor maX

jbg, neki se nikad nece pomirit s istinom

Pogotovo ako nije istinita

Jerry · 10.06.2008., 09:42

Citiraj:

Autor Fleks

Intel FTW

1P - da
2P - mozda
4P - mos' mislit!
http://www.vmware.com/products/vmmark/results.html

segregator · 10.06.2008., 10:04

Citiraj:

Autor Jerry

1P - da
2P - mozda
4P - mos' mislit!
http://www.vmware.com/products/vmmark/results.html

To je upravo i poanta onog članka, Intel je uspio brute force pristupom (10 puta više cache-a, ogroman FSB, malo benchmarketinga...) postići prednost na desktop strojevima, ali kad se stroj pristojno optereti, AMD-ova superiorna arhitektura pobjeđuje (ok, možda bi bilo poštenije reći DEC-ova arhitektura

)

Vidjet ćemo kako će ispast stvar sa Nehalem-om

Makar, kad se uzme u obzir clock, SPARC izgleda još uvijek rula

09.06.2008., 15:57	#1
segregator Propali Amigaš Moj komp Datum registracije: Jan 2003 Lokacija: Nin Postovi: 7,005	Ko je brži, AMD ili Intel - malo drugačiji pogled http://weblog.infoworld.com/yager/ar...tml?source=rss Ako imate volje čitati, članak je malo duži "AMD counters the gearhead-level speeds and feeds derived from synthetic benchmarks with IT-relevant load metrics. In Web transactions, virtualization, and parallel workloads, Quad-Core Opteron outperforms quad-core Xeon by margins of 9 to 16 percent. But there's a point worth noting: AMD scored these wins with a 2.3GHz CPU and 2MB of Level 3 cache. Intel lost out to AMD with quad-core Xeon CPUs running at 2.83GHz with 12MB of cache. The configuration differences between the two architectures give AMD what you call headroom. AMD is holding manufacturing process shrink, CPU clock speed, bigger cache, and additional cores as cards to play on IT's behalf when the time is right."

09.06.2008., 20:11	#4
Codiac bycod Datum registracije: May 2004 Lokacija: Zagreb / Dubrava Postovi: 6,699	onaj tko imalo cjeni lovu ce znati za svaku namjenu uzeti proc... __________________ .i. Razer Blade 15

09.06.2008., 16:50	#2
Gilbert5 Agent 0 Moj komp Datum registracije: Feb 2007 Lokacija: Kutina - ZG Postovi: 4,312	Segre se opet bori sa vjetrenjačama

09.06.2008., 16:55	#3
segregator Propali Amigaš Moj komp Datum registracije: Jan 2003 Lokacija: Nin Postovi: 7,005	Nisam ja majke mi, tip na slici uopće ne sliči na mene

10.06.2008., 03:35	#6
Fleks JDM Datum registracije: Sep 2004 Lokacija: Zagreb Postovi: 6,137	Intel FTW

Oglasni prostor
PC Ekspert Forum Oglas