Ko je brži, AMD ili Intel - malo drugačiji pogled
 

http://weblog.infoworld.com/yager/ar...tml?source=rss

Ako imate volje čitati, članak je malo duži

"AMD counters the gearhead-level speeds and feeds derived from synthetic benchmarks with IT-relevant load metrics. In Web transactions, virtualization, and parallel workloads, Quad-Core Opteron outperforms quad-core Xeon by margins of 9 to 16 percent. But there's a point worth noting: AMD scored these wins with a 2.3GHz CPU and 2MB of Level 3 cache. Intel lost out to AMD with quad-core Xeon CPUs running at 2.83GHz with 12MB of cache. The configuration differences between the two architectures give AMD what you call headroom. AMD is holding manufacturing process shrink, CPU clock speed, bigger cache, and additional cores as cards to play on IT's behalf when the time is right."

Segre se opet bori sa vjetrenjačama :D

Nisam ja majke mi, tip na slici uopće ne sliči na mene :D

onaj tko imalo cjeni lovu ce znati za svaku namjenu uzeti proc... :)

jbg, neki se nikad nece pomirit s istinom :D

Intel FTW :D

Pogotovo ako nije istinita :D

1P - da
2P - mozda
4P - mos' mislit!
http://www.vmware.com/products/vmmark/results.html

To je upravo i poanta onog članka, Intel je uspio brute force pristupom (10 puta više cache-a, ogroman FSB, malo benchmarketinga...) postići prednost na desktop strojevima, ali kad se stroj pristojno optereti, AMD-ova superiorna arhitektura pobjeđuje (ok, možda bi bilo poštenije reći DEC-ova arhitektura :D )

Vidjet ćemo kako će ispast stvar sa Nehalem-om

Makar, kad se uzme u obzir clock, SPARC izgleda još uvijek rula