ATi isto vara

[Black Dragon]

Prije nego te uhvate, priznaj, i pola ti se oprosti (moš mislit). Uglavnom i ATi je varao u 3DMarku2k3 (tako im je izjavio neki glavešina) i ostvario je dobit od, pazi sad, astronomskih 1,9% i to samo zato što je malo optimizirao u Game Testu 4 Shadere na vodi i nebu. Više ne varaju i neće (do prve prilike)

[Kova]

Hehe

Ma who cares ?!

[segregator]

Po Futuremarku, granica greške testa je 3%
A i nije izjavio da su varali, jer je za razliku od Nvidije kvaliteta slike ostala ista

[Black Dragon]

ATI’s Director of PR, Chris Evenden, has since issued the following statement:

"The 1.9% performance gain comes from optimization of the two DX9 shaders (water and sky) in Game Test 4 . We render the scene exactly as intended by Futuremark, in full-precision floating point. Our shaders are mathematically and functionally identical to Futuremark's and there are no visual artifacts; we simply shuffle instructions to take advantage of our architecture. These are exactly the sort of optimizations that work in games to improve frame rates without reducing image quality and as such, are a realistic approach to a benchmark intended to measure in-game performance. However, we recognize that these can be used by some people to call into question the legitimacy of benchmark results, and so we are removing them from our driver as soon as is physically possible. We expect them to be gone by the next release of CATALYST."

Eto nije baš rekao du varali, već oni samo kao koriste prednosti svoj arhitekture ali pošto to nekima smeta oni će to u slijedećoj verziji maknuti. Čitaj između redova. To je kao da Porsche izbaci 6 brzinu jer ostali imaju 5 ili 4 pa da se izjednaće sa drugima i nije fora da imaju 150 KS više od drugih pa će i to srezat, moš misliti