Filmovi - dojmovi, komentari i preporuke

[mamutarka]

neki dogovor davno bješe da se ''mora'' u hyperlink stavit ime filma

[Mirkopoter]

Autor Promo

Jesam li ja jedini koji vidi normalno "klikabilne" linklove kolege:
Ili je svima tesko klikati..

Post ispod nas je triggerao

[Promo]

..e jbg ja kontam da je to sarkazam

[Tajl3r]

Autor Promo

Jesam li ja jedini koji vidi normalno "klikabilne" linklove kolege:





Ili je svima tesko klikati...

A u u sta je bilo
Tesko je kliknit isto ka sta je meni tesko stavit ime filma olaksat cemo drugi put


Poslano sa mog SM-S918B koristeći Tapatalk

[mkey]

Ubuduće kod stavljanja linkova stavi podatke za spajanje za teamviewer pa da se možeš ljudima spojiti i poklikati im linkove. Ipak bi tako nekako najlakše bilo.

[pogi]

The Astronaut

Počeo gledati, pa ubrzao, pa prekinuo.... ili je užas ili nisam bio raspoložen za gledanje

[Mommistake]

Cought Stealing - Tip samo mačku pazi...

Nekakav akcijski s crnim humorom, meni baš nije pretjerano sjeo.
Na momente mi je bacio na rane filmove Richia i Vinnie Jonesa, ali ni blizu tako kvalitetno.

Sve u svemu, gledljivo, ali ne više od 5/10 za mene.

[Mirkopoter]

Autor pogi

The Astronaut

Počeo gledati, pa ubrzao, pa prekinuo.... ili je užas ili nisam bio raspoložen za gledanje

Pa s obzirom na ocjenu 4.7/10, mislim da je užas.

[pogi]

Autor Mirkopoter

Pa s obzirom na ocjenu 4.7/10, mislim da je užas.

Navuko me SF žanr, ali da, nisam puno gubio vremena na njega u konačnici

[cic]

Autor Tajl3r

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt17676734/

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1493274/

Ok oba neki prosjek malo nategnutih 7/10

Poslano sa mog SM-S918B koristeći Tapatalk

Ufff Americanu sam ugasio nakon pol filma, ni Sydney me nije uspjela zadržat do kraja

[Mar]

Vidim da se ovdje nije spominjalo ali sinoć sam baš pogledao KPop Demon Hunters
https://m.imdb.com/title/tt14205554/

Moram priznati da je film skroz dobar sa nekoliko odličnih glazbenih brojeva.

[Mar]

Još jedna preporuka, ne znam kako do sad nisam stiga pogledati:
Breakfast Club

[Mar]

Još jedna preporuka, ne znam kako do sad nisam stiga pogledati:
The Breakfast Club

[mkey]

Nisi stigao do sada pa si ga pogledao dvaput


Ja pogledao taj toliko spominjani Caught stealing, film je OK za pogledati. Oko 7 je kao neka smislena ocjena.

[John Creasy]

Primitive War (2025)

jurassic park na steroidima, ok film

[Mommistake]

Naked Gun novi - dugo nisam veće sranje gledao. Na preskokce, nasmijao sam se svega jednom. 3/10 max.

[Mario92]

Kolko je blizu starim filmovima sa Nielsenom? Originalni filmovi su mi vrh

[Mommistake]

Autor Mario92

Kolko je blizu starim filmovima sa Nielsenom? Originalni filmovi su mi vrh

A jako je teško reći ustvari koliko je vrh. Bio je onda vrh, danas taj humor, nisam siguran je li mi više odgovara.
Uzevši to u obzir, stari je 3x bolji od ovog.

[Ivo_Strojnica]

Autor Mario92

Kolko je blizu starim filmovima sa Nielsenom? Originalni filmovi su mi vrh

Jako je blizu, isti je djir.
AKo si volija stare, volit ćeš i novi

[Mladenxy]

The Long Walk

Ljimunad. 5/10

[mkey]

Eto, meni nije teško: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt10374610/

[pogi]

Autor mkey

Eto, meni nije teško: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt10374610/

[Mladenxy]

Drugi puta ću zacrniti bez da otvara link

[Mario92]

Autor Ivo_Strojnica

Jako je blizu, isti je djir.
AKo si volija stare, volit ćeš i novi

Onda ga stavljam na popis!

[kopija]

Ovo je čist solidno za pogledat.

[Mommistake]

Ja sam naletio na TV-u na: The Others.

Dobar.

[Promo]

^Moj najdrazi horror film. Ima jedan na slicnu temu ali ono.. ako kazem koji je reference radi The Others, znat ces kako zavrsi. Pa ga nadji sam

[pogi]

Autor kopija

Ovo je čist solidno za pogledat.

Zanimljivo

[kopija]

Anthony Capaccio October 25, 2025
Pentagon Frets Over ‘A House of Dynamite’ Nuclear
Doomsday Film
bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-10-25/-house-of-dynamite-nuclear-missile-defense-fail-has-pentagon-worried
The Missile Defense Agency has expressed concerns over the depiction of US
missile defense as ineffective in the movie A House of Dynamite.
An internal memorandum from the agency argues that the movie's doomsday
scenario is inaccurate and underestimates US capabilities, citing real-world testing
results as evidence.
The agency disputes a line in the movie stating that current missile defenses have a
50% chance of knocking down a missile, claiming that today's interceptors have a
100% accuracy rate in testing for more than a decade.
The plot of A House of Dynamite, the new thriller from Academy Award winner Kathryn
Bigelow, hinges on — spoiler alert — US missile defenses failing to knock down a
nuclear-tipped intercontinental ballistic missile headed for Chicago.
The Pentagon agency responsible for the more than $50 billion system of ground-based
interceptors in Alaska and California designed to avoid just such a scenario isn’t happy
about it. The movie, starring Idris Elba and Rebecca Ferguson, had a limited theater
release and is now streaming on Netflix.
A Missile Defense Agency internal memorandum argues that the doomsday scenario
depicted in the movie is inaccurate. The Oct. 16 memo, a copy of which was obtained by
Bloomberg News, is meant to make sure agency leadership “has situational awareness
and is not ‘surprised’ by the topic, which may come up in conversations or meetings.”
The object of the Missile Defense Agency’s angst is depiction of US missile defense as
ineffective, especially in light of the fact that President Donald Trump wants to spend tens
of billions of dollars on missile defense, including with his bid for a “Golden Dome”
defensive umbrella.
The document, labeled “Only For Internal MDA and Department of War use and is not
public releasable,” is dated a day after almost every member of the Pentagon press
corps, including Bloomberg News, vacated the building rather than agree to rules that
could restrict news gathering of documents such as the MDA assessment.
It was prepared to “address false assumptions, provide correct facts and a better
understanding” of the US’s currently deployed system, it said. While the film “highlights
that deterrence can fail, which reinforces the need for an active homeland missile defense
system,” its fictional portrayal also underestimates US capabilities, according to the
memo.
1/3
“The fictional interceptors in the movie miss their target and we understand this is
intended to be a compelling part of the drama intended for the entertainment of the
audience,” but results from real-world testing “tell a vastly different story,” the Pentagon
says in the memo.
As guidance for questions about the system’s cost, the memo avoids a dollar amount,
saying “the cost is high but not nearly as high as the cost of allowing a nuclear missile to
strike our nation.”
A Government Accountability Office report in 2020 said the Pentagon had spent about
$53 billion on the ground-based system and planned to spend about $10 billion through
this year to continue developing, producing and sustaining it. The system is managed by
Boeing Co. and operated by personnel under the US Northern Command.
Accuracy Rate
One focus of the memo is a line in the movie in which the defense secretary, played by
Jared Harris, laments that current missile defenses have a 50% chance of knocking down
a missile despite their $50 billion price tag.
The MDA says that’s based on earlier prototypes and today’s interceptors “have displayed
a 100% accuracy rate in testing for more than a decade.”
Experts dispute that. Laura Grego, a long-time missile defense critic with the Union of
Concerned Scientists who has seen the film, said the scenario it depicts is the least
threatening possible — a single missile on a known trajectory. Military tests have been
similarly limited, she said.
“A robust defense should anticipate facing multiple incoming ICBMs and credible decoys,
and direct attacks on missile defense elements, but none of those were part of the story in
this film,” Grego said. “The fictional threat is arguably about as easy as they come.”
The Pentagon said in a statement to Bloomberg News that it wasn’t consulted for the film,
which “does not reflect the views or priorities of this administration.” The system “remains
a critical component of our national defense strategy, ensuring the safety and security of
the American people and our allies.”
A Netflix spokesperson didn’t respond to a request for comment.
A representative for Bigelow pointed to her remarks on CBS’s Sunday Morning arguing
that she didn’t seek cooperation from the Pentagon.
“I felt that we needed to be more independent,” she told CBS. “But that being said, we
had multiple tech advisers who have worked in the Pentagon. They were with me every
day we shot.”’
2/3
The Trump administration hasn’t disclosed substantive details of its still ill-defined Golden
Dome land, sea and space-based defensive shield. Space Force General Michael
Guetlein, the four-star general leading the effort, last month completed a blueprint for the
program. The Pentagon declined to provide details about its scope or cost.
3/3

[Mladenxy]

A House of Dynamite

Dobar, nisam čak ni gledao u mobitel tijekom gledanja film