|
17.07.2021., 14:32 | #11251 |
Premium
Datum registracije: May 2004
Lokacija: OS
Postovi: 216
|
baš htjedoh postaviti isto pitanje, mene su učili da sa splitterom jedino mogu biti lošiji parametri? da nabavim splitter? |
17.07.2021., 14:38 | #11252 | |||
Premium
Datum registracije: Oct 2010
Lokacija: Kaštel Lukšić
Postovi: 1,404
|
wan0
Jul 17 05:53:46 pppd[8621]: No response to PAP authenticate-requests
Jul 17 05:53:46 pppd[8621]: Connection terminated.
Jul 17 05:53:56 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from 88:a2:5e:1c:f8:bb on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag
Jul 17 05:53:56 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from 88:a2:5e:1c:ff:d2 on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag
Jul 17 05:53:56 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from 88:a2:5e:1c:f8:92 on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag
Jul 17 05:53:56 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from fa:16:3e:23:36:c2 on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag
Jul 17 05:53:56 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from 00:90:1a:a2:bb:df on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag
Jul 17 05:53:56 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from 00:90:1a:a3:1b:aa on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag
Jul 17 05:53:56 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from 00:90:1a:a2:bc:fa on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag
Jul 17 05:53:56 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from 00:90:1a:a4:e3:1f on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag
Jul 17 05:53:56 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from 88:a2:5e:1c:ff:a9 on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag
Jul 17 05:53:56 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from fa:16:3e:9e:99:c3 on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag
Jul 17 05:53:56 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from fa:16:3e:0c:39:83 on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag
Jul 17 05:53:56 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from fa:16:3e:46:56:2d on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag
Jul 17 05:53:56 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from 00:90:1a:a4:e3:73 on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag
Jul 17 05:53:56 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from 88:a2:5e:1c:f8:69 on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag
Jul 17 05:53:56 pppd[8621]: Connected to 88:a2:5e:1c:f8:bb via interface wan0
Jul 17 05:53:56 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADS packet from 88:a2:5e:1c:f8:bb on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag
Jul 17 05:53:56 pppd[8621]: Connect: ppp0 <--> wan0
Jul 17 05:53:56 pppd[8621]: PAP authentication succeeded
Jul 17 05:53:56 pppd[8621]: peer from calling number 88:A2:5E:1C:F8:BB authorized
Jul 17 05:53:56 pppd[8621]: local IP address XXXXXXXX
Jul 17 05:53:56 pppd[8621]: remote IP address 172.29.252.117
Jul 17 05:53:57 wan: finish adding multi routes
Jul 17 05:53:57 miniupnpd[10643]: shutting down MiniUPnPd
Jul 17 05:53:57 miniupnpd: it is advised to use network interface name instead of 192.168.1.1/255.255.255.0
Jul 17 05:53:57 start_ddns: update WWW.NO-IP.COM default@no-ip.com, wan_unit 0
Jul 17 05:53:57 inadyn[8332]: In-a-dyn version 2.7 -- Dynamic DNS update client.
Jul 17 05:53:57 miniupnpd[8324]: HTTP listening on port 58999
Jul 17 05:53:57 miniupnpd[8324]: Listening for NAT-PMP/PCP traffic on port 5351
Jul 17 05:53:57 kernel: [790261.752697] Archer TCP Pure ACK Enabled
Jul 17 05:53:57 inadyn[8332]: Update forced for alias XXXXXXXX, new IP# XXXXXXXX
Jul 17 05:53:58 inadyn[8332]: Remove old cache file /var/cache/inadyn for XXXXXXXX
Jul 17 05:53:58 inadyn[8332]: Updating cache for XXXXXXXX
Jul 17 05:53:58 ddns: ddns update ok
Jul 17 05:54:01 WAN Connection: WAN was restored.
-->
Citiraj:
Citiraj:
Citiraj:
EDIT#1 Izgleda da TCom ima nekih problema sa DSLAMima(jednom tjedno u mene) u zadnje vrijeme prođe zahtjev za auth. i onda mu DSLAM neodgovara pa pola minuta kasnije sve prođe uredno. Code:
Jul 17 05:53:06 pppd[8621]: Connection terminated. Jul 17 05:53:06 pppd[8621]: Modem hangup Jul 17 05:53:06 WAN Connection: Failed to authenticate ourselves to peer. Jul 17 05:53:16 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from fa:16:3e:e9:c4:6a on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag Jul 17 05:53:16 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from 88:a2:5e:1c:f8:bb on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag Jul 17 05:53:16 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from 88:a2:5e:1c:f8:92 on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag Jul 17 05:53:16 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from 88:a2:5e:1c:ff:d2 on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag Jul 17 05:53:16 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from 00:90:1a:a2:ba:36 on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag Jul 17 05:53:16 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from 00:90:1a:a2:ba:40 on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag Jul 17 05:53:16 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from fa:16:3e:af:73:83 on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag Jul 17 05:53:16 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from 00:90:1a:a4:e3:1f on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag Jul 17 05:53:16 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from fa:16:3e:46:56:2d on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag Jul 17 05:53:16 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from 00:90:1a:a2:bc:fa on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag Jul 17 05:53:16 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from 00:90:1a:a3:1b:aa on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag Jul 17 05:53:16 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from 88:a2:5e:1c:ff:a9 on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag Jul 17 05:53:16 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from 00:90:1a:a2:bb:df on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag Jul 17 05:53:16 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from fa:16:3e:25:0c:f5 on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag Jul 17 05:53:16 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from fa:16:3e:23:36:c2 on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag Jul 17 05:53:16 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from 00:90:1a:a4:e3:73 on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag Jul 17 05:53:16 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from fa:16:3e:0c:39:83 on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag Jul 17 05:53:16 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from fa:16:3e:9e:99:c3 on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag Jul 17 05:53:16 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from 3c:61:04:d3:18:7b on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag Jul 17 05:53:16 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from 3c:61:04:d3:1f:40 on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag Jul 17 05:53:16 pppd[8621]: Connected to fa:16:3e:e9:c4:6a via interface wan0 Jul 17 05:53:16 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADS packet from fa:16:3e:e9:c4:6a on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag Jul 17 05:53:16 pppd[8621]: Connect: ppp0 <--> wan0 Jul 17 05:53:46 pppd[8621]: No response to PAP authenticate-requests Jul 17 05:53:46 pppd[8621]: Connection terminated. Jul 17 05:53:56 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from 88:a2:5e:1c:f8:bb on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag Jul 17 05:53:56 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from 88:a2:5e:1c:ff:d2 on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag Jul 17 05:53:56 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from 88:a2:5e:1c:f8:92 on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag Jul 17 05:53:56 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from fa:16:3e:23:36:c2 on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag Jul 17 05:53:56 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from 00:90:1a:a2:bb:df on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag Jul 17 05:53:56 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from 00:90:1a:a3:1b:aa on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag Jul 17 05:53:56 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from 00:90:1a:a2:bc:fa on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag Jul 17 05:53:56 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from 00:90:1a:a4:e3:1f on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag Jul 17 05:53:56 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from 88:a2:5e:1c:ff:a9 on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag Jul 17 05:53:56 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from fa:16:3e:9e:99:c3 on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag Jul 17 05:53:56 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from fa:16:3e:0c:39:83 on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag Jul 17 05:53:56 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from fa:16:3e:46:56:2d on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag Jul 17 05:53:56 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from 00:90:1a:a4:e3:73 on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag Jul 17 05:53:56 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADO packet from 88:a2:5e:1c:f8:69 on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag Jul 17 05:53:56 pppd[8621]: Connected to 88:a2:5e:1c:f8:bb via interface wan0 Jul 17 05:53:56 pppoe-relay[8617]: PADS packet from 88:a2:5e:1c:f8:bb on interface wan0 does not have Relay-Session-Id tag Jul 17 05:53:56 pppd[8621]: Connect: ppp0 <--> wan0 Jul 17 05:53:56 pppd[8621]: PAP authentication succeeded Jul 17 05:53:56 pppd[8621]: peer from calling number 88:A2:5E:1C:F8:BB authorized Jul 17 05:53:56 pppd[8621]: local IP address XXXXXXXX Jul 17 05:53:56 pppd[8621]: remote IP address 172.29.252.117 Jul 17 05:53:57 wan: finish adding multi routes Jul 17 05:53:57 miniupnpd[10643]: shutting down MiniUPnPd Jul 17 05:53:57 miniupnpd: it is advised to use network interface name instead of 192.168.1.1/255.255.255.0 Jul 17 05:53:57 start_ddns: update WWW.NO-IP.COM default@no-ip.com, wan_unit 0 Jul 17 05:53:57 inadyn[8332]: In-a-dyn version 2.7 -- Dynamic DNS update client. Jul 17 05:53:57 miniupnpd[8324]: HTTP listening on port 58999 Jul 17 05:53:57 miniupnpd[8324]: Listening for NAT-PMP/PCP traffic on port 5351 Jul 17 05:53:57 kernel: [790261.752697] Archer TCP Pure ACK Enabled Jul 17 05:53:57 inadyn[8332]: Update forced for alias XXXXXXXX, new IP# XXXXXXXX Jul 17 05:53:58 inadyn[8332]: Remove old cache file /var/cache/inadyn for XXXXXXXX Jul 17 05:53:58 inadyn[8332]: Updating cache for XXXXXXXX Jul 17 05:53:58 ddns: ddns update ok Jul 17 05:54:01 WAN Connection: WAN was restored. Zadnje izmijenjeno od: Karlo666. 17.07.2021. u 14:57. |
|||
|
|
Oglas
|
|
17.07.2021., 14:54 | #11253 |
Premium
Datum registracije: May 2004
Lokacija: OS
Postovi: 216
|
hmm kablovi su novi, što sam dobio uz onog kako ti kažes "speedšrota " uzeo sam preko njuškala za 50kn ovaj zte tak' da imam sada oba, jedino što mi pada na pamet su one dvije bakrene žice u utičnici sto imam da ih malo "ošmirglam" i ponovo zategnem ili možda da kupim novu utičnicu... ugl budem danas malo čačkao pa javim |
17.07.2021., 15:03 | #11254 | |
Premium
Datum registracije: Oct 2010
Lokacija: Kaštel Lukšić
Postovi: 1,404
|
Citiraj:
Ako su ti novi kabeli onda sam provjeri utičnicu pa kao imaš volje nabavi alat pa sve DIY. Nevolim kako meštri rade jer sve nabrzaka spoje samo da mogu napustit pogotovo šta se tiče utičnica u dosta slučajeva CAT6 spajaju u CAT5 jer eto kao njima je ok. To ti je samo jedan od primjera a di je tek kad tehničar iz TComa dođe pa samo svine dvi parice i malo izolira pa spoj je 0 bodova al eto radi jel ma moš si mislit. I sve ti je to radi gazde jer oni ti imaju tablet na kojemu imaju određeno koliko minimalno korisnika taj dan moraju obići pa su stalno u trci. Znam jednog lokalnog TComaša koji živi 300injak metara od mene i sam mi je to potvrdio. Za razliku od drugi ISP tehničara TComovi ti čak znaju VLAN IDove i prioritye.Kako i zašto nebi znao ali znali su točno. A di su tek sranja sa regletama koje nabijaju nogama jer neponesu ključ za otvorit pa kad malo bolja kiša padne sve pokisne. Ovako ti je kralj iz TComa meni spojia ovo je doslovno za otkaz. https://i.imgur.com/jLamHNE.jpg I dok nisam sam nastupio margine i ostale pizardije poput random DC i CRC errora su se događale https://i.imgur.com/dqc88ql.jpg U mom slučaju Plave+Narančaste su se pokazale za najbolji link na ISP kabelu i otada skoro pa da i nema CRCova. Zadnje izmijenjeno od: Karlo666. 17.07.2021. u 15:15. |
|
17.07.2021., 15:15 | #11255 | |
Premium
Datum registracije: May 2004
Lokacija: OS
Postovi: 216
|
Citiraj:
|
|
17.07.2021., 16:38 | #11256 | |
Premium
Datum registracije: Jan 2007
Lokacija: Zagreb
Postovi: 755
|
Citiraj:
koliko vidim razlika na drugoj slici je jedino ta da si napravio novu kucnu instalaciju. |
|
17.07.2021., 17:05 | #11257 | |
Premium
Datum registracije: Oct 2010
Lokacija: Kaštel Lukšić
Postovi: 1,404
|
Citiraj:
Meni nije uredu da mi netko svine dvi žice i kaže zbogom a kad nastane problem nikoga nije briga. I to ti je problem u 70% korisnika jer niti sami neznaju šta imaju pa se jadaju ISPu i Hakomu a pojma nemaju. |
|
17.07.2021., 17:10 | #11258 |
Premium
Datum registracije: Jan 2007
Lokacija: Zagreb
Postovi: 755
|
svine parice? moram priznat da ne znam o cemu pricas, evo gledam sliku i ne kuzim.. |
17.07.2021., 17:38 | #11259 | |
Premium
Datum registracije: Oct 2010
Lokacija: Kaštel Lukšić
Postovi: 1,404
|
Citiraj:
Inače ako ti je ovakav način rada spajanja korisnika ok onda neznan što da ti kažem. I da ovi kabeli su izgubili 5% max ratea nakon par mjeseci jer su stajali ovako pa čak i na podu i gaženi i bacani ko zadnje bakreno smeće koje se čeka da ga se reciklira za novce. https://i.imgur.com/4LUeawm.jpg Ali ovo nije prvi puta da je ovako vidio sam i gorih slučajeva gdje je korisnik pripremio PTT kutiju a ovaj raskopao a kabeli vise vani jer naravno gazda reko spoji i piči dalje. Zato ja nedam tehničaru da mi kopa,kad god on dođe njegovo je da sjedne za stol da odmori i popije piće pa stisne na tabletu "Enable". |
|
17.07.2021., 22:31 | #11260 |
Premium
Datum registracije: Jan 2007
Lokacija: Zagreb
Postovi: 755
|
o cem ti pricas? pa koja je razlika u spoju lokalne i dolazne parice u slici 1 i slici 2? zbog tog spoja sigirno nisi imao greske nego vjerojatno zbog lose lokalne instalacije pa si je zatoni mijenjao. |
|
|
Oglas
|
|
17.07.2021., 22:38 | #11261 | |
Premium
Datum registracije: Oct 2010
Lokacija: Kaštel Lukšić
Postovi: 1,404
|
Citiraj:
Moj problem je bio u kućnoj instalaciji. Kao što sam i prethodnim postovoima rekao u 80%+ slučajeva uvijek je do korisnikove instalacije. Neke reglete u mom području doživjele su vatromet,petarde,udarce autima/kamionima,udarce čekićima i ostale pizdarije od nemarnih ljudi/bauštelaca a ovi tech. iz TCom niti se netrude prijaviti takvo što jer boli neka stvar iako sam im par puta sam prijavio pa će ispast da ću tribat ko onaj aktivist iz Imotskog. Jedan iz mog mista je bio ljut na A1 i uzeo je doslovno čekič i porazbijao cjelu regletu jer eto njemu nije valjalo. Ja nemogu virovat da je tebi uredu da tech. iz TComa udre nogom u poklopac od reglete i ostavi poklopac nasrid ceste i zaboli ga neka stvar i to nisam jednom doživio već preko 100 puta.Likovi nisu u stanju uzest dvije vide i pričvrstit da poklopac drži doslovno 1 min posla. A ostalim pizdarijama neželim niti pričat šta su ovi likovi iz Strabaga uradili sa regletama,telefonskim poklopcima,itd... Likovi doslovno su jednu ulicu totalno krivo spojili.Telefon od drugog korisnika zvoni drugome.Pa di je tek kad su spojili krivo korisnika pa nije imao ama baš ništa. Nabijaju na regletu kabele običnom kacavidom. Dali ti trebaju i slike toga da se sam uvjeriš da nije neka zabluda/teorija zavjere ili šta? Dali isto tako znaš da isti ti tech. iz TComa nemaju volje izvadit iz torbe nabacivač pa zagule paricu pa nadostave? Dali ti treba preko 100 GoogleMaps pinova gdje su smočene/oštećene/rastvorene/ reglete? Treba li ti još šta da te uvjerim ili ćeš biti uporan? Zadnje izmijenjeno od: Karlo666. 17.07.2021. u 22:56. |
|