OCCT stability test

[Tetedeiench]

Just a small post to keep you guys updated

OCCT PT is right now at 1.1.0.b09 , and will soon be released as... 1.0.3. I've delayed 1.1.0, and want to release an intermediate version, because the changes needed for 1.1.0 would take too long.

This version brings many new features :
*New, more effective Error detection algorithm
*Multi-CPU temperature support
*Custom temperature and voltages support
*Modified graphic design
*Maximum CPU Temperature
*Hyperthreading as Dual-core Option ( i.e. treat a P4 HT as if it was a Dual-Core Pentium 4 ==> launch 2 threads )

It corrects some bugs, including the "Allendale" => "Conroe" one

I've sent a mail to domy_os with the new translation to do (language files to update can be found in the latest beta zipfile, in the locale subdir). About 15 new strings

Just feel free to tell me if you found any bugs

http://www.ocbase.com/OpenBeta/OCCTPT1.1.0.b09.zip

[Mr.Ex.President]

Downloading: boxers :

[Tetedeiench]

Let me know how things are going for you

[Vuco]

Samo da napišem što je Tetedeiench napisao na XS-u :

Autor Tetedeiench at XS forums

And keep in mind that we are dealing with a random thing : sometimes an error will be generated, sometimes not. OCCT just stresses your CPU to make an error likely to happen... but the time it is detected and produced may vary. But you can be sure of one thing : you should always trust the program detecting an error. OCCT, SP2004, Prime95 can be trusted Others too, probably. That's up to your own judgement !

i

Autor Tetedeiench at XS forums

OCCT is a bit more demanding and stresses the CPU a bit more, from testing results, as the other CPU stability program with error checking.

I'll never be on par with TAT on C2duos

Priznaje da nikada neće moći biti u rangu Intelova TAT-a ali da je u rangu ostalih programa za testiranje stabilnosti, ako ne i bolji

@ Tetedeiench

The 30 minute (auto)test isn`t best at generating errors because of instability, can you improve it somehow? Or is it just simpy made for getting those nice graphs under load ?

EDIT:
Can you make a plug-in for Core Temp, as it is the best programme for temperature measuring of K8 and C2D?

Nice job on Everest plug-in

[domy_os]

Tetedeiench, you've got a mail...

Za ostale: promijenio sam "prava brzina" u "originalni takt" i još neke sitnice...

[Mr.Ex.President]

Autor Vuco

Nice job on Everest plug-in

Meni ne radi... napiše:


Ako odaberen ''Yes'' smrzne se

[Vuco]

Ja ga nisam probao
Samo sa vidio da je tamo...

Ali bilo je riječi o tome što ne? Čini mi se kao da sam vidio taj error već negdje?

[Tetedeiench]

Autor Vuco

Samo da napišem što je Tetedeiench napisao na XS-u :

i


Priznaje da nikada neće moći biti u rangu Intelova TAT-a ali da je u rangu ostalih programa za testiranje stabilnosti, ako ne i bolji

@ Tetedeiench

The 30 minute (auto)test isn`t best at generating errors because of instability, can you improve it somehow? Or is it just simpy made for getting those nice graphs under load ?

EDIT:
Can you make a plug-in for Core Temp, as it is the best programme for temperature measuring of K8 and C2D?

Nice job on Everest plug-in

Hey vuco Thanks for your message on xtreme

The Auto test will be revamped soon (in 1.1.0). It'll include 1 hour of CPU&RAM, as well as 2 or 3 passes of the new memory checking algorithm.

As for Core temp, i'll look into it, but there isn't any Shared memory or any way to get the readings out of the program... i can't promise you anything. i'll check !

1.1.0 should bring :[*]New memory checking algorithm ( memtest-like, probably less effective though )[*]Revamped graphs ( especially the scales, probably unified )[*]New auto-test (at least one hour + memory checking algorithm)

and more on the way...

I'll try to look into Vista compatibility... as soon as i get my hands on a copy of Vista I'm waiting for one at my work.

[Vuco]

No problem
Do what you can...

[Mr.Ex.President]

Autor Vuco

Ja ga nisam probao
Samo sa vidio da je tamo...

Ali bilo je riječi o tome što ne? Čini mi se kao da sam vidio taj error već negdje?

Ma nije mi ni bitno... al
mbm 5 mi je nije baš točan
Speedfan neman
Everest ne radi



Al nema veze, u pozadini otvorin ITE Smart Guardiana

[Vuco]

Stari, evo sada probao, stavio čistu instalaciju Everesta (Ultimate V3.50 nešto), pisalo mi je ono da je disejblano, pita dal oću enable-at, roknem OK i sve dela.

[Mr.Ex.President]

Autor Vuco

Stari, evo sada probao, stavio čistu instalaciju Everesta (Ultimate V3.50 nešto), pisalo mi je ono da je disejblano, pita dal oću enable-at, roknem OK i sve dela.

Znači Everest sere... ok, promjenim ga

U mene je bija Ultimate v3.01

[Tetedeiench]

I don't quite understand what you guys are saying, but only Everest Ultimate 3.50 and above is supported

[Mr.Ex.President]

Autor Tetedeiench

I don't quite understand what you guys are saying, but only Everest Ultimate 3.50 and above is supported

I didn´t know that. it`s OK now.:burn:

[Vuco]

Autor Tetedeiench

I don't quite understand what you guys are saying, but only Everest Ultimate 3.50 and above is supported

His computer was freezing when he pushed the OK button for enableing shared memory for Everest. He had an unsupported version, that`s what we have talked about.

Now we know

[Tetedeiench]

Unfortunatly, i haven't found any way of detecting Everest's version before trying to enable Shared memory in it :/

I'm looking for a way to minimize Everest's window as well Seems the SendMessage with WM_MINIMIZE doesn't work

[beroland]

Čini mi se da OCCT ne rasponaje ispravo C2D jezgre novijih serija.
Moj je E6400 Conroe, a OCCT kaže da je Allendale.

[Razer]

Allendale je zapravo Conroe sa 2mb cachea...zato ga cpu-z tako prepoznaje (starije verzije su ga prije prepoznavale kao allendale)...znači occt zapravo i najtočnije prepoznaje c2d

[Quake2]

Autor Razer

Allendale je zapravo Conroe sa 2mb cachea...zato

Netočno.E6300 je isto conroe,a allendale će biti još skresana verzija.Koliko sam ja skužio.To sam negdje pročitao,gdje ne sječam se više

[Tetedeiench]

This bug was fixed in the latest beta (1.1.0). In 1.0.2, every Conroe will be reported as Allendale...

[Tetedeiench]

http://www.ocbase.com/OpenBeta/OCCTPT1.1.0.b11.zip

Beta 11, almost there for 1.0.3 stable

Including the new translations (thanks domy_os ), Vista compatibility, new everest beta compatibility, a few bugfixes in CPU detection... among new stuff.

Soon 1.0.3

[Swarm dude]

Cool! Finally, Croatian translation, not quite that english bothers me, but it is always nice to see a program in your native language (thanx to domy for that)
Time to update my prehistoric version of OCCT with this new one.
I bet there will be no major problems in detecting my poor little old Northwood


Hmmm but there is sth. that confuses me. At the Custom test Options it has a "hook"(I don't actually know how to say this in english, in Croatian it is called kvačica. Help guys ) at the Hyperthreading as Dual Core option, meaning that it is enabled. But my CPU doesn't support HT :confused:
Its not quite of an error, but it looks kind of strange when you don't have a HT processor

[Vuco]

Meni je to zasivljeno (ali je isto kvačica). Tako da, ne obazirem se na to. To je valjda po defoltu uključeno za procesore sa HT-om.

[Swarm dude]

Yap zasivljeno je, ne smeta mi uopće nego eto, to mi je prvo palo u oko dok sam kopao po opšnsima programa

[Tetedeiench]

Autor Swarm dude

Cool! Finally, Croatian translation, not quite that english bothers me, but it is always nice to see a program in your native language (thanx to domy for that)
Time to update my prehistoric version of OCCT with this new one.
I bet there will be no major problems in detecting my poor little old Northwood


Hmmm but there is sth. that confuses me. At the Custom test Options it has a "hook"(I don't actually know how to say this in english, in Croatian it is called kvačica. Help guys ) at the Hyperthreading as Dual Core option, meaning that it is enabled. But my CPU doesn't support HT :confused:
Its not quite of an error, but it looks kind of strange when you don't have a HT processor

On a non HT processor, enabling/disabling this option doesn't do a single thing

It is enabled by default on HT CPUs because it gives better results... i could uncheck it if the CPU isn't HT-capable... i'll look into that

[Swarm dude]

Don't bother about that, I was looking around the options and that just cought my eye
As I said, it's not an error or sth. like that

[Tetedeiench]

Autor Swarm dude

Don't bother about that, I was looking around the options and that just cought my eye
As I said, it's not an error or sth. like that

Too late... It's done

I'll release b12 tonight. Made some more changes to the GUI...

It's a work in progress, not yet finalized :

[Swarm dude]

Wow, that was really fast
I'm impressed

[Tetedeiench]

Autor Swarm dude

Wow, that was really fast
I'm impressed

I have that reputation of being aware of my user's request

I actually read someone, in France, asking for the "VCore, 3.3V,..." again in the GUI.

I ended up revamping the GUI, even if i thought b11 was a RC... it is definitly not now

Look at that screen shot :


Now they're asking me to remove, in the Monitoring part, the blank space on the left where "CPU", etc, is, and extend every cell to full extent of the width...

That's going to be a few hours... but mind you, i'll photoshop it first

[McG]

Autor Swarm dude

At the Custom test Options it has a "hook"(I don't actually know how to say this in english, in Croatian it is called kvačica. Help guys )

It's called...check box, i.e. check tick/mark
I'm a bit late with the answer and seeing this thread, but better late than never.
Regarding the thread and the effort put into OCCT all I can say is: goood :
Keep up with the good work, both Tetedeiench and PcE members that are helping him.