|
-->
Citiraj:
Autor Fug33
i ostali tipovi igara su postali itekako zahtjevni
npr witcher, neverwinter nights 2, world in conflict, hellgate london, test drive unlimited, etc
dosta zahtjevne igre na 1680x1050 sa full detaljima (hellgate je prakticki negriv na toj rezi sa full detaljima, NWN2 uredno igram ispod 30FPSa, oblivion na full detaljima ide ispod 40FPSa)
to sa testom koji si pronasao ne mora znaciti bas nista
zavisi od testnih uvjeta, tko je uopce pravio test, koji procovi su bili u pitanju, itd
ne znam koliko ces se uspjeti naigrati tih igara na X2 4200+ na 1680x1050 High postavkama
|
HI!
Ma znam da su zahtjevne. Al mislim na framerate. Kaj nije pravilo da je za RPG dovoljno između 30 i 40fps, a za FPS ili slično više od 50fps?
Sto se tiče proca,
AnandTech:
...
In Bioshock, the difference in performance at 2.66GHz and 3.33GHz is negligible, but once we drop the clock speed to 2.0GHz you start to see performance drop off. What this tells us is that even at mid-2GHz clock speeds, even a 3-way 8800 Ultra setup is GPU bound in Bioshock. And even at 2.0GHz, the 3-way setup is far from fully CPU bound as performance is still better than the two card system with a 3.33GHz CPU.
Similarly, Oblivion isn't CPU bound at all. Even at 2.0GHz, we don't see a significant drop in performance.
Crysis does actually benefit from faster CPUs at our 1920 x 1200 high quality settings. Surprisingly enough, there's even a difference between our 3.33GHz and 2.66GHz setups. We suspect that the difference would disappear at higher resolutions/quality settings, but the ability to maintain a smooth frame rate would also disappear. It looks like the hardware to run Crysis smoothly at all conditions has yet to be released.
We feel kind of silly even entertaining this question, but yes, if you want to build a system with three 8800 Ultras, you don't need to spend $1000 on a CPU. You can get by with a 2.66GHz chip just fine.
Pozdrav 
|