Mozda ste u pravu da se ne treba brinuti, ali vidio sam po review-ima da se ljudi zabrinjavaju oko toga. Npr. anandtech kaze "The 650i SPP chipset is passively cooled with a mid-rise heatsink unit that did not interfere with any installed peripherals but did run hot without additional airflow over it during overclocking."
Neoseeker: "Honestly, I was a bit disappointed in the overclocking potential of this board. But I can't fault Asus - I think the problem lies with how hot the 650i+570 chipset runs. Unfortunately, talk on the web is that the Asus 680i and 650i boards run hotter than the same boards from other manufacturers. I can't verify this but I'm sure going to check out the boards from a few other brands for comparison!
Don't get me wrong though, I did manage to get to a stable 465MHz - but I had to jump through proverbial hoops to get there, including having two 12cm 63CFM fans blow on the passive chipset heat pipes - why? - because I was worried if I did not, I'd slag the motherboard!"
Ovo kako je taj tip s neoseekera hladio nb je jasno neprihvatljivo za svakodnevnu upotrebu, jer ne namjeravam drzati maticnu cijelo vrijeme otvorenu, na stolu.
Dakle ima toga jos i po drugim reviewima, ali svi pricaju o tome a nitko ne nudi
neka konkretnija i prihvatljiva rjesenja. A s druge strane - ne cuje se bas da je netko skurio plocu zbog tog pregrijavanja - pa je sad ipak nejasno - treba li brinuti (i traziti rjesenja) ili ne?