Satya Nadella announced Microsoft needs an "engineering quality czar" and appointed Charlie Bell, who used to lead security, into the new role. The company also hired Google Cloud's president for customer experience to take over security.
Nadella's post doesn't say why Microsoft suddenly needs someone focused on engineering quality. Could be the Azure outages. Could be the Windows patches that break the OS instead of fixing it. Could be the out-of-band patch spree. Could be that only 3.3% of Microsoft 365 users are willing to pay for Copilot.
...Or maybe it's because Microsoft uses AI to write 30% of its own code now.
My Take
Microsoft laid off their dedicated QA teams back in 2014 under Nadella. They've been relying on the Windows Insider program as free testing ever since. Now they're hiring a "quality czar" to fix problems that exist because they cut the people who used to catch them.
They bragged about 30% of their code being AI-written. GitClear found code churn doubled after AI tools were introduced. Microsoft's own researchers found developers miss 40% more bugs reviewing AI-generated code. Stock is down 23% since earnings. They're pulling engineers off new features to stabilize Windows 11. And now they need a czar to address quality issues. I'm not saying AI caused all of this. But when you cut QA, replace human code with AI code, and then scramble to hire someone to fix quality, it's worth asking whether the efficiency gains were ever real or just deferred costs showing up later.
Sent from my SM-S931B using Tapatalk