WTF šta je sa tim gamingom kod rocket lakea?
Citiraj:
A Comment on Gaming: Core Latency
Users looking at our gaming results will undoubtedly be disappointed. The improvements Intel has made to its processor seem to do very little in our gaming tests, and in a lot of cases, we see performance regressions rather than improvements. If Intel is promoting +19% IPC, then why is gaming so adversely affected?
The answer from our side of the fence is that Rocket Lake has some regressions in core-to-core performance and its memory latency profile.
As noted by Andrei in our cache hierarchy testing, the biggest change is that the L3 latency is now ~51 cycles, rather than ~43 cycles. This is probably where a lot of the core-to-core latency performance drop comes in, as we are now seeing latencies of 28-30 nanoseconds on most cores, rather than 18-24 as observed on Comet Lake. The much slower L3 in raw cycles is contrary to what we saw on the Sunny Cove version of this core, and with no obvious answer as to why this might be the case, but it does lend itself a lot as to the gaming performance. Intel may at a later date disclose the exact reasons for this structural change.
|
Sad ispada da launch rocket lakea nema apsolutno nikakvog smisla
Bolje im je da alder lake valja, jer onda stvarno ne znam što će biti...
Stavke koje bi Alder MORAO ispuniti, jer bi u protivnom bio fail:
- pomesti sve intelove prethodne flagship desktope u singlecore i multicore, znači i9 10900K i i9 11900K. I to ne za 5%, nego baš nešto opipljivo. Pushing u multiju od R9 5950X bi se mogao istrpiti budući da nisu tipične jezgre
- biti bolji u gamingu od intelovih prethodnika i zen3
- da ne troši i da se ne grije ekstremno
- ne smije imati neku prekstremnu cijenu (znam da će biti skup ako bude valjao).