Citiraj:
Autor Sn4k3
S20 Plus Snapdragon vs Exynos
Ne znam koliko je test realan al nebi me cudilo da je sammy odlucio produljit ionako los battery life na exynosu naustrb performansi.
Napominjem, nacin testiranja se sastoji od Speed Testa G u loop modu, sto znaci da je stand-by totalno zanemaren, di se zapravo vidi
koliko exynos ima izrazen drain u usporedbi sa snapdragonom. Realno malo koji korisnik dobije SoT od npr. 5h tako da prcka po mobitelu
neprestanih 5h uz stand by od 0min 
|
Pa nije ni čudo kada exynos izthrottla I radi na 50% brzine. Nebi to nazvao boljom baterijom pod loadom.
Tu bi trebalo napraviti w per fps ili vice versa I onda vidjeti koji je efikasniji u loadu. Tako to rade ozbiljni sajtovi(notebookcheck I Anand tech)
A anandtech kaže(samo dan ranije);
Galaxy S20 (Snapdragon 865) N7P 54.09 3.91 13.75 fps/W
Galaxy S20 (Exynos 990) 7LPP 49.41 4.87 10.14 fps/W
Citiraj:
|
Finally, in T-Rex, things are again quite horrible for the Exynos chip. Sustained performance is a little over half the peak performance figures as the chip suffers from major thermal throttling. Looking at the power draw, we’re reaching an awful 5.63W which is notably worse than the Exynos 9820.
|
Citiraj:
|
Overall, the conclusion on battery life isn’t quite as black & white as we thought it would be. The key point is to stay away from the seemingly broken Performance mode on the Exynos chipset and you’ll have roughly similar battery life results between the two SoC variants of the S20. Naturally, that’s only being achieved by the fact that the Exynos does showcase worse performance, saving energy by using the more efficient lower performance states more.
|