Citiraj:
Autor nub
Najjači release godine. Evo jedan hajlajt iz texta:
The chip would cost around $220 US. That is much higher than the Core i3-7350K which retails around $170 US. Performance wise, the chip is stated to be just 1.25% faster than the Core i3-7350K so basically the same chip on a different platform.
|
Šema je što je i taj i3-7350K jako loš value, te je dobio gotovo jednoglasne "don't buy this" recenzije. I onda ga spiče na x299 i dignu cijenu
No dobro, tko kupi to je mega debil i sam si je kriv. IMO mislim da će prodaja tog biti očajna, bolje da ga nisu ni izbacili, dobiju samo loš marketing.
Nego evo još recenzija 16 i 18 corea
https://www.techspot.com/review/1493...0xe-and-7960x/
https://www.pcper.com/reviews/Proces...9-and-18-cores
https://www.extremetech.com/computin...-7980xe-review
No zaključak smo praktično i sami napisali još prije:
Citiraj:
Wrap Up
The price to performance scatter plots summarize the situation quite well. The new Intel Core i9 CPUs are blistering fast in every test but ultimately weren't that much faster than the Threadripper 1950X. Considering the fastest Core i9s cost anywhere from 70 to 100% more, it's hard to justify what often is a 10% increase in performance.
Overclocked, these Skylake-X parts aren't worlds faster either -- about 15-20% over an overclocked 1950X yet they draw at least 20% more power. This puts Intel's new 16-core and 18-core CPUs in a bit of a jam if you ask me.
|
Citiraj:
ArsTechnica UK:
"80% more cash than a 1950X for less than 20% more performance? Tough sell"
"Conclusion: There's little justification for the price tag. Buy a Threadripper 1950X instead."
|
Citiraj:
Extremetech:
The problem for Intel’s triumphant narrative is, well, AMD. The Core i9-7980XE is unquestionably fast, but it’s not 2x faster, or even 50 percent faster than Threadripper in any test we ran. CPUs above $1,000 are going to be less elastic than the conventional desktop market, but cost always matters to some extent. Just because companies or individuals can afford to pay top dollar for a CPU doesn’t mean they don’t care about price at all. When Intel had the high-end market entirely to itself, the company could afford to set its own prices. With AMD’s Threadripper 1950X already in market, it’s harder to justify the cost.
Customers who want the absolute highest-end CPU and can afford to pay for it will prefer the Core i9-7980XE. But anyone who doesn’t fit into that market is going to be hard-pressed to opt for the Core i9-7900X when the Threadripper 1950X offers higher workstation performance at the same price. Intel has retaken the performance crown, but it hasn’t swept the workstation field — not by a long shot.
|