[Manuel Calavera]

Autor MadBoY

Fury Nano ce biti tu negdje s R9 390X vjerojatno, samo ~100 W manja potrosnja.

Također i skuplja po procjenama

Iskreno ne kužim kako će toliko smanjti potrošnju i zadržati toliko perfomansi furya, malo too good to be true

Now AMD has already launched their Fiji XT based Radeon R9 Fury X and Fiji Pro based Radeon R9 Fury. Those cards are rated with a 275W TDP while the Radeon R9 Nano, also a Fiji based card is 175W. The reason it is so efficient has to do with two things and those include a significantly cut down Fiji GPU along with lower clock speeds. Even with those in place, the card is still faster than the 290 and 390 series that are based on Hawaii GPU. In fact, AMD confirmed to us that the Radeon R9 Nano is about 85-90% of Radeon R9 Fury X (in terms of performance). We still don’t know as to how much extent is the card disabled since the card has a launch slated for later in summer, this year, but I can guess that the card may be priced around the $449-$499 US range. But it was revealed by several sites that the Nano will come with the full Fiji core so we believe AMD is using some magic spice to make this card operate at 175W.
There’s reason to believe so, the AMD Radeon R9 390X which features the Hawaii XT (Grenada XT) core is said to be slower than the Radeon R9 Nano. The Radeon R9 390X is priced at $429 US at the moment so it will be a bad decision to release the card at a lower price than 390X. The $449 Us and $499 US spots actually sound a lot better since it offers better performance than R9 390X and even comes close to the Radeon R9 Fury X, then it will be an interesting offering in the consumer market. Do note that this is just speculation and the card may even end up priced lower than my guesses here.

Par slika

http://wccftech.com/amd-radeon-r9-na...etailers-soon/