Citiraj:
Originally posted by Codiac-
JAAAAAAAAAAAKO sam razocaran jer testovi nelazu 
ati ati crni ati
|
ti "testovi" uopće nisu pravi testovi...
ovi su te "brojke" dobili od nekog ATI partnera....barem tako kažu...znači ni luk jeli, ni luk mirisali...
stoga, evo nekoliko citata za one kojima se ne da kliknut na link:
Citiraj:
|
Sorry guys, can't help you with pics or driver revs and all that, the testing was done in the lab of one of ATI's board partners in Taiwan, and they're not about to disclose who they are, as ATI will certainly want a 'word' with them. Nevertheless my hat's off to them and a big thanks is in order, as they were willing to help me when we came to them for a scoop a few weeks ago, and a scoop it sure was.
|
Citiraj:
|
Sander [tip sa HardwareAnalysisa] obviously did not produce the results himself, yet apparently the results come from a board partner in Taiwan. Although the "review" misses out a lot of info it positions the R520 products at the 7800 GT and GTX level. Both give and take a little. I really don't know if we can trust the results published by Sander as you need to test a product in-house and not rely on 3rd party based beta engineerging products.
|
Citiraj:
ATI's (Chris Hook) first reaction to this article was: " Fiction. I don't believe these numbers were ever run on a 520 ".
A second response just came in:
"This is a complete hoax - done with an OC'd X850, we think. Call our partners yourself and ask if they have R520XTs in house. The numbers aren't even close."
|