premalo 3d mark bodova??
 

Evo imam Gigabyte radeon 9700 pro i drivere verzija 6.3!!

u 3d marku dobijem bijednih 10450 bodova
a normala za tu grafu je oko 14000 i to s kompom slabijem od mojeg((iz siga))

neam pojma u čemu je problem!!

Sruši windowse, instaliraj najnovije drivere za maticnu, graficku...instaliraj 3dmark i skini najnoviji patch i javi reze

o kojem se 3dmarku radi? pretopstavljam 01...

uglavnom on puno ovisi o procesoru,a tvoj sempron nije baš u cvijetu mladosti pa se nemoj ni cudit... probaj reinstalirati win

moguče jer sam 3 put stavljao nove grafe i ***************o po driverima.....a frend mi reko da stavim omega drivere neke starije...

Što se onda čudiš...ruši windowse i nemoj slušati frenda....instaliraj najnovije catalyste ili xtreme-g warcats drivere

evo stavio nove windoze i drivere...ali isto :::((((((((((((((

u čem je problem???

Nemam trenutno 3d mark 2001 pa ti nemogu reći koliko moja postigne (izgleda da imamo identične kartice, moja je malo clockana)... Ajd probaj sa 3d mark 2005 pa vidi! Moja napravi oko 2500, konfa iz siga.

Alo ljudi 10k, da ima celeron na 2GHZ imao bi više!
Stavi u opcijama AA i AF na Off i stavi sliku na high performance.

u 3d mark 2005 imam 2339bodova

jel to ok??

to je ok za tvoju grafu, čini mi se da se tvoja konfa i 3dmark01 bas i ne vole, no ako je skor u 05 takav, onda je sve ok

da jer sam došo do zaključka da moram stavit novo napajanje jer ovo dtk 300watt nije dovoljno!!

sutra kad stavim opet izmjerim!

a kaj bi ti?

Ja sam sa 6800le, gigom rama i 2.8c dobivao oko 14 000. Nece ti nista vise rasti taj skor. Jednostavno 2k1 je ovisan o procu. ne samo o grafi. Nemas se kaj brinut.

gle ja sam sa svojom 9800pro dobivao cca 16k bodova..tka da...mislim da je ovo sa 9700premalo...a imao sam mobilca 2500+ dignutog na 2,4..malo sam ga provozao kroz testova :) i rame iz siga :)

ma dajte pa ja sam imao 6600GT i nisam mogao preko 12k, skroz mi se vrtilo 200fps i tako konstantno

Malo je bodova, to je sigurno. Ja sam imao oko 14000 u 2001 SE, 5000 u 03 i 2500 u 05. Kad sam kloknuo Bartona s 2500+ na 3200+, bilo je 16000-17000 u 01, kod ostalih neznatno povećanje.

..ja sa radenom 9700pro i athlonom 2200+ (1800mhz-a) oko 14500

sa sam sa 9600xt imao oko 15000
samo zato jer je preski radio na 3.9 ghz
2001 je govno ovisno o procu
iz istog razloga mi se ne svida 2006
uzmi 2005 i testiraj

iz toga mozemo zakljuciti da grafa daje premalo markova i da crash nema pojma :D :D :D

@1van ..starije drivere stavi ...ovo s novima slobodno ako zelis da ti negdje fali slika..

kuzi ove scorove...downclockao sam proc na 1 ghz :) u nekim slucajevima

http://img59.imageshack.us/img59/8048/1lo5.jpg

http://img370.imageshack.us/img370/542/2sz8.jpg

http://img45.imageshack.us/img45/7382/3wm1.jpg

hehee...moj a64 2800+ clockan i r9700 clockanom postize preko 20000 3dmarka 2001 :)

Ma bravo - ideš uspoređivati neclockanog bartona i clockanog a64...

inače da zaključim topic ovo je bio problem!


We've had this graphics card in our possession for a while now and really wanted to test it on our new dedicated graphics card test rig, a VIA KT400 based mainboard with DDR400 which is AGP8x compatible. Oh boy, we've had problems people ... it took us literally 3 weeks to figure out why this combination had so much issues and was doing random crashes, games lock up after a few seconds, benchmarks where a complete disaster as well ... crashes again, HD corruption, you name it we got it. We've tried driver revisions, chipset revisions and yet failed to get this board stable. Then we took it to other test systems, KT333 .. worked fine, all Pentium 4 platforms worked fine .. then we took 2 different Radeon 9700 Pro's from another brand into our new test-rig .. the KT400 and hey .. not one Radeon 9700 Pro was willing to work properly on it. After contacting Gigabyte, Hercules, Albatron and ATI themselves we stumbled into something I had actually written about myself a while ago in our news section. The VIA KT400 may have problems with early revision of the Radeon 9700 Pro .. and that it did. Next to me are 3 difference Radeon 9700 pro graphics cards, total value about 1500 Euro .. they are all based on revision 1.0 and 1.1 and yes ... they all do not work on our new kick'ass KT400 based test platform.
I got assurance that the newer revisions of the Radeon 9700 pro work on KT400, in fact I have a revision 3 Radeon 9700 pro inbound. But ehm, remember this little tail when you are about to buy a new system and are considering a Radeon 9700 pro okay ? Before buying look at the board/PCB, there's a number on it stating the revision. Make sure it's at least revision 3.0 !

moja konfa, ggrafa na defaultu šije preko 17k markova 01 i 2400 mrakova 05...

ma de ajde budite sretni,ja dobijem jedva 2100 bodova u 05

to je onak, previse za 9600 ??

ZA 9600 JE TO PUNO....:)

Davno sam izvrtio taj čmarak 2001 SE, mislim da je bilo oko 18 somova na ovoj konfi.

Ako ima gigu i po rama kao što mu piše u sigu onda je možda i realan rezultat...

Otkad to memorija ima toliki utjecaj na konačni score?

lol...a kaj da je imo 3-4gige onda bi imo 30000score lol:clap::clap: