PC Ekspert Forum - Radeon X1900XTX vs. GeForce 7900GTX

PC Ekspert Forum (https://forum.pcekspert.com/index.php)

- AMD Radeon (https://forum.pcekspert.com/forumdisplay.php?f=11)

- - Radeon X1900XTX vs. GeForce 7900GTX (https://forum.pcekspert.com/showthread.php?t=34289)

a ovo ti je nekaj u stilu ferrarija
dobar monitor
http://www.prad.de/guide/screen2751.html

Pinsla, jel taj LG bolji od Samsunga 970P? I što misliš o novim Benq-ovima?

Zanimljivo.
I cijene su vani bogme zanimljive-za razliku od naših:(
Baš sam sad gledal...

Citiraj:

Autor Sky

Pinsla, jel taj LG bolji od Samsunga 970P? I što misliš o novim Benq-ovima?

Koji Lg? 19-inčni mu nije ni do koljena ipak je to TN matrica
20-inčni LG bi pak mogao biti nešto bolji barem što se vidljivog kuta i brzine tiče
970p je najbolji 19-inčni monitor koji sam ja vidio uz možda Xeroxa XA19i ali one prve serije sa AUO matricom
poslije su nažalost u njega počeli gurati šugavi CMO TN
Kaj se tiče Benqa moram pogledat ovisno o modelu

Moj 17" monitor će u 36. tjednu ove godine napuniti jubilarnih 10 godina i ne dam ga dok ne crkne :D

I na kraju, prema toni testova, GeForce 7900GTX i Radeon X1900XTX su veoma blizu, samo mi nejde u glavu to što GF 7900GTX ima manje tranzistora nego GF 7800GTX -----> 278 vs. 302 miliona u GF 7800GTX-u

A vjerojatno je nVidia optimizirala dizajn da bi se smanjila potrosnja chipa i toplinska disipacija.. pa su negdje uspjeli maknut neke tranzistore,a da to ne utjece previse na brzinu chipa.

Ili je netko krivo racunao :D

mislim da je netko krivo racunao

mozda su zamijenili 3 sa 2, pa mozda ima 378 miliona tranzistora

Ocito nisam jedini koji je zakljucio da se nV orijentirala na efikasniji i "hladniji" dizajn:

Citiraj:

NVIDIA’s goals this round were to improve performance but more so, they set out to improve efficiency through a better manufacturing process, using less power, and reducing the number of transistors. I’d say they managed those goals well. We are very impressed with the effort that has gone into the G71 and G73 technologies in order to make them power-friendly GPUs.

ATI’s goals were a little different this past refresh. ATI knew they had to elevate performance so they added more ALU processors, increased transistors, which increased heat. NVIDIA already had 48 ALUs with their last-generation part and added very few features in this new GPU. The move to a smaller manufacturing process allowing for a more efficient pipeline design means NVIDIA has actually scaled back on the number of transistors that are present in this superior GPU. The reduction in transistors and the smaller die size mean this is more power-friendly and temperature-friendly GPU that can result in better yields for NVIDIA’s production as well.

From: [H]ardOCP

I inace su smanjivanje temp. disipacije i bolji "performance per watt" trend u zadnje vrijeme medju proizvodjacima chipova (Intel, AMD, nVidia... cekamo ATi :D )

izgleda da se nVidia malo trgnula sa efikasnoscu cipova