AMD "Threadripper/Epyc" Info thread

[Manuel Calavera]

MSI confirms Creator TRX40 motherboard for Ryzen Threadripper 3000

[BusMaster]

https://wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-threa...cpu-confirmed/

[BusMaster]

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X, 3970X, 3960X CPUs Announcement Planned For November 5th

https://wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-threa...x-launch-leak/

[Manuel Calavera]

AMD server win squeezes ARM

[Manuel Calavera]

AMD 2nd Gen EPYC Rome Processors Feature A Gargantuan 39.54 Billion Transistors, IO Die Pictured in Detail


AMD EPYC’s Chinese Counterpart, Hygon C86, Takes The No.1 Spot In Cryptography SiSoft Ranker Benchmark

[BusMaster]

AORUS Teases Their Flagship TRX40 XTREME Motherboard For AMD 3rd Gen Ryzen Threadripper CPUs – 16 Power Phases

https://wccftech.com/aorus-trx40-xtr...er-cpu-teaser/

[The Exiled]

• HPC Leadership Where it Matters — Real-World Performance

56 core Xeon Platinum 9282 ranges from 8% to 84% better performance (31% higher geomean) than AMD’s 64 core Rome-based system (7742) on leading real-world HPC workloads across manufacturing, life sciences, financial services and earth sciences.

• Core Scaling and Gaming Performance — How Many Cores Do You Need?

For gaming, 8-cores is the optimal spot for performance scaling in modern PC gaming, and at 8-cores we get the best frequency scaling out of our Coffee Lake products and 14nm process technology today. And clock speed is what feeds the hungry primary threads of game engines today! The first thing I see with this set is that going from 8-cores to 12-cores results in less than 10% scaling in all games, and in that 12-game set, 9 of them improve by 5% or less. What about that 12-core to 16-core jump? Only one game in our results today sees an improvement (Ashes of the Singularity once again) while the other 11 games not only do not scale up in performance, THREE of them actually regress slightly, offering lower performance than a 12-core configuration.

• Intel Performance Strategy Team Publishing Intentionally Misleading Benchmarks

Today something happened that many may not have seen. Intel published a set of benchmarks showing its advantage of a dual Intel Xeon Platinum 9282 system versus the AMD EPYC 7742. Vendors present benchmarks to show that their products are good from time-to-time. There is one difference in this case: we checked Intel’s work and found that they presented a number to intentionally mislead would-be buyers as to the company’s relative performance versus AMD. By Intel using the post-2nd generation Intel Xeon Scalable version of GROMACS but the pre-AMD EPYC 7002 series which had been out for over a month, Intel’s numbers are highly skewed for the Platinum 9282 which only has a 20% lead. One can only conclude that Intel’s “Performance at Intel” blog is not a reputable attempt to present factual information. It is simply a way for Intel to publish misinformation to the market in the hope that people do not do the diligence to see what is backing the claims. Once one does the diligence, things fall apart quickly.

• Running on Intel? If you want security, disable hyper-threading, says Linux kernel maintainer

Linux kernel dev Greg Kroah-Hartman reckons Intel Simultaneous Multithreading (SMT) - also known as hyper-threading - should be disabled for security due to MDS (Microarchitectural Data Sampling) bugs. OpenBSD was right, he said. "A year ago they said disable hyper-threading, there's going to be lots of problems here. They chose security over performance at an earlier stage than anyone else. Disable hyper-threading. That's the only way you can solve some of these issues. We are slowing down your workloads. Sorry."

Ryan Shrout i društvo se iz petnih žila trude najbolje što mogu, pa nije čudno da je ovaj materijal ugledal svjetlo dana taman prije sutrašnjeg predstavljanja novih Threadripper 3000 modela.

[BusMaster]

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32 Core & 64 Thread CPU Listed Online For Around $1200 US

https://wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-threa...listed-online/

[Momir]

AMD Threadripper gets a new box

Meni malo gadna kutija, ako ce biti takva, ali koda je bitna kutija

[The Exiled]

Sve je bitno, sad kad Ryan Shrout napravi kritički osvrt na potencijalno pakiranje i usporedi to s Intelovim - AMD nakon toga nema kaj tražiti u tom tržišnom segmentu.

[Psycho]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BxqPAPkGe70

TR3960X 1400$
TR3970X 2000$

koliko ce maticna kostati nitko nije spomenuo, mozda 500?

[The Exiled]

Da i cijene novih ploča budu popularne, tak je bilo i s X399 modelima, a ove bi trebale biti i malo skuplje.

[Amd_Shill]

A koja smijesna cifra za te CPU.
Intel bi to naplatio tri puta vise od crvene bande.

[BusMaster]

Autor Psycho

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BxqPAPkGe70

TR3960X 1400$
TR3970X 2000$
koliko ce maticna kostati nitko nije spomenuo, mozda 500?

_______________________________________________________________

https://www.tomshardware.com/news/gi...0-motherboards

https://www.tomshardware.com/news/as...-3000-unveiled

https://www.guru3d.com/news-story/as...i-extreme.html

https://www.guru3d.com/news-story/ms...herboards.html

U najavi kažu oko 500-600$ za entry-level TRX40 ploče, Flagshipovi kao ovi gore u linkovima i do 1000$. Sve mobo dolaze sa hrpom PCIex 4.0 lanea, znači ništa jeftino, a i VRM-ovi su redom svi zvjerski... i oprema ploča isto.

[Lewis]

Hmm i dalje nevidim ponatu toliko PCI-E laneova i onda samo 4 (ili 5 u najboljem slucaju) PCI-E slotova na flagship maticnoj od 1000$.