3.5" SATA HDD-ovi veći od 500 GB

[domy_os]

U ovoj temi iznosite svoja pitanja u vezi kupnje te iskustva i preporuke o tvrdim diskovima za stolna računala veličine 3.5" i kapaciteta većeg od 500 GB na SATA sučelju.

Svakako pogledajte i ove teme:

Western Digital Caviar WD6400AAKS
http://forum.pcekspert.com/showthread.php?t=106108

WD Caviar Black (ALS serija)
http://forum.pcekspert.com/showthread.php?t=111992

Samsung F1 750 GB ili WD 750 GB
http://forum.pcekspert.com/showthread.php?t=104520

Seagate Maxtor DiamondMax 22 750 GB (STM3750330AS)
http://forum.pcekspert.com/showthread.php?t=106266

Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1 TB (ST31000340AS)
http://forum.pcekspert.com/showpost....2&postcount=98

[^SuperUnknown^]

Hitachi 7K1000 1TB review:
http://forum.pcekspert.com/showthread.php?t=89595

[Vuco]

U testu su sljedeće serije diskova:

Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000
Hitachi Deskstar A7K1000
Samsung SpinPoint F1
Seagate ES.2
Seagate 7200.11
WD Caviar GP

Link na X-bit Labs

Conclusion:

Autor X-bit Labs

The two drives from Hitachi can be discussed as one because they have very similar results in every test. The Hitachi team did well in the server patterns but failed in the multithreaded tests. According to Futuremark, the Hitachi drives are ideal as hard disks for a workstation. They have been superb in every version of PCMark (thanks to their high Average Positioning Speed). In FC-Test the Hitachi team is only inferior to the Samsung SpinPoint F1, which means a lot. These HDDs are also good in our homemade test of defragmentation speed (thanks to the high APS again) but the overall impression is somewhat spoiled by the power consumption tests. 16 watts is quite a lot.

The Samsung SpinPoint F1 features high recording density, low power consumption and superb performance in the desktop-oriented tests. It has very good results in PCMark and excellent results in FC-Test and in the defragmentation test. On the other hand, it was hopeless in the server patterns. Hopefully, the server version of this drive, the SpinPoint F1 RAID, is going to be faster in the server-oriented applications. A peculiar feature of this drive is that it prefers controllers with high bandwidth. If you buy it, you should provide a fast SATA controller to reveal this drive’s potential (SATA-300 controllers integrated into mainboards will do).

The Seagate drives seem to have server roots. It looks like the developer wrote server-oriented firmware into both of them. As a result, the Barracuda 7200.11 and Barracuda ES.2 have no problems in multithreaded tests and even win at multithreaded reading. They also feel good in the Database pattern and in the File-Server and Web-Server patterns. They failed in the PCMark tests, though. The Barracudas were not brilliant in FC-Test, either, although were quite fast at reading large files. They were also slow in our defragmentation test. So, I am waiting for Seagate’s programmers to write new firmware.

Western Digital’s Caviar GP is the most ambiguous product in this review. On one hand, the manufacturer’s claim of low power consumption of this product is true. On the other hand, we can see the tradeoff just too clearly. The reduction of the spindle rotation speed to 5400rpm made it virtually impossible for this HDD to compete with the alternative products in terms of performance. Well, the Caviar GP should be given credit for challenging the other drives in some tests. It was fast in the multithreaded tests and competed with the Seagate drives in PCMark. It was quite good in FC-Test, too. In fact, this HDD can be quite a fine hard disk for a home PC because it is quiet and consumes little power. Still, I wish Western Digital added a 7200rpm model into the Caviar GP series. On my part, I promise to benchmark its performance without bias as soon as it arrives.

[DeadMan+]

jako mi se svidja metodologija X-bit Labs-a u ovom testu
a sto se tice samih HDD-a, cini se da svaki model ima nesto, sad samo ovisi sto kome treba, WD je jako dobar po potrosnji, Samsung je odlican za desktope, Seagate za server...

[yedwy]

Ja sam uzeo danas Samsunga F1 od 1TB pa ćemo vidjeti kako će se ponašat...

[Iceman11]

aj postaj impresije pliz, ja ga isto planiram kupit za tjedan, dva...

[yedwy]

A kaj reći nema problema za sad, jedan dan u životu diska znači - ništa...

Velik je, zato sam ga i uzeo iako sam prvo mislio WDC 640 uzet predomislio sam se, bolje uzeti nešto da ziher imam mjesta a cjena po mb je još uvjek dobra...

[Iceman11]

malo OT...

dal mislis/mislite da mi se isplati uzet jos dva manja diska(speedy1, speedy2, ili WD320) za neko sistemsko raid polje il ce mi ovaj 1 ko sistemski radit sve super brzo...

[mislav_os]

Pa inace je RAID 0 za sistem onako,hajmo rec,preporucljiv ...Ali ne znam dal ces vidjeti toliku razliku i ak uzmes neki veci(brzi) HDD

[yedwy]

Autor Iceman11

malo OT...

dal mislis/mislite da mi se isplati uzet jos dva manja diska(speedy1, speedy2, ili WD320) za neko sistemsko raid polje il ce mi ovaj 1 ko sistemski radit sve super brzo...

Ja mislim da se ne isplati trpati nikakav RAID u desktop mašinu (osim ako se baš želiš igrati RAIDom naravno, a onda ionako isplativost ne igra niakvu ulogu) zato jer su windowsi napravljeni tako (a posebno vista) da svoje izvršavanje i rad baziraju na ramu i što veća količina istoga im je na raspolaganju to su oni sretniji...

Za windowse je bolje uzeti 4gb rama i jedan disk nego 1gb i RAID primjerice, mislim vidjet će neko možda i poboljšanje (tipa da se neka igra neće dizati 15s nego 10s ili sl) ali generalno da će nekome pretjerano to u životu značit - neće (osim ako ne radi sa videom/slikama/animacijama koje prave veliki pritisak na dskovni sustav i zatao mu treba ali to više nije klastični desktop stroj) posebno ako se ispravno rasporedi zadatke diskovima i pridržava se reda...

[Iceman11]

ma konfa koju vec imam doma mi je u sig-u(btw, 4GB rama...), fali mi jos samo graficka i hard koje kupujem ovaj tjedan...
uletio mi je deal sa gazdom firme di radim, pa mogu sve uzet sa rabatom i bez pdv-a na rate, tak da su mi apetiti malo porasli

a neznam kolko mi je pametno uzet samo 1TB hard, a nemat jos 1 za backup. Razmisljem o 2 manja harda za raid 0 polje(ili cak 10 polje sa 2 manja harda i F1 jednom particijom iste velicine, a ostatak za backup)...

u principu jos samo moram odlucit dal uzet speedy1, speedy2, ili WD320?

[domy_os]

Razmišljam o ovom WD-u Green Caviar 1 TB, ali vidim da ima dvije verzije - ta što je u testu (10EACS) i RE2 (1000FYPS), vjerojatno više optimizirana za RAID, što god to značilo. Taj disk mi se čini kao jako dobar izbor za storage u serveru. Vrti se na 5400 rpm, ali nije puno sporiji od konkurencije koju u nekim testovima čak i gazi. Troši manje energije i vjerojatno je dosta tiši, a RE2 verzija ima i 5 godina garancije.

Žao mi je što u test nisu ubacili i WD Caviar Black (1001FALS), vjerojatno bi po performansama bio u rangu Samsunga 1 TB, možda čak i bolji, a također ima 5 godina garancije.

Nadam se da će mi uskoro uletiti jedan od ovih modela iako mi se Caviar Black najviše sviđa...

[yedwy]

Ja se ne sekiram oko toga, ako se baš kojom nesrećom i desi da mi ovaj storage disk crkne, onda je crko i kaj sad mislim ruku na srce nemam ništa tolko nenadoknadivo na njemu i sve se opet može skupit na ovaj ili onaj način...
Mislim bila bi to frustracija ali i gore stvari se u životu dešavaju, a i inače s obziom na kvalitetu DVDa u zadnje vrijeme nije da su i oni nekaj posebno siguran izbor...
Btw RAID nije backup i čim su dva diska u istom kompu automatski to s backupom veze nema jer već banalna stvar kao kvar napajanja može ubit oba...

Na ovom mjestu napominjem - od kad kupujem nove diskove (to je negdje 2000g) niti jedan mi nije crkao (u biti čak niti zadnja dva polovna koja sam prije njih imao nisu) pa valjda neće sad počet kvragu...

[CatKiller]

RAID5 i 3 5400rpm WD-a mi se cine savrsenim za storage. Hladno, pouzdano, tiho.