|
14.12.2010., 13:08 | #1 |
Premium
Datum registracije: Feb 2005
Lokacija: Zagreb
Postovi: 2,138
|
BSOD svako malo
Dakle pojavljuje mi se BSOD cca svakih 2 sata(nekad i svakih 10 min, a nekad ga nema po 4-5 sati), problem se poceo javljati pred 5 dana i neovisan je o razini opterecenja racunala. Radi se o konfi iz siga(gigabyte p55a ud3r, i7 860, gskill 2x2gb ddr3 ram, raid0 od dva wd blue 1TB hhd-a, 460gtx i dvd prža pioneer) koju sa vratio na defaultne postavke u BIOS-u kako oc nebi utjecao na stalna rušenja no napredka nije bilo. Prvo sam mislio da je problem bio do nvidinih drivera(260.99) koje sam instalirao pred 5/6 dana, no vracanjem na stare problem je ostao. Otvaranjem crash dump-a u windbg vidjeh da jedina dva razlozloga rušenja su: 1.razlog: ntkrnlmp.exe BugCheck 7F, {8, 80050031, 6f8, fffff8000309dec8} Probably caused by : ntkrnlmp.exe ( nt!KiDoubleFaultAbort+b2 ) Followup: MachineOwner --------- 2: kd> !analyze -v ******************************************************************************* * * * Bugcheck Analysis * * * ******************************************************************************* UNEXPECTED_KERNEL_MODE_TRAP (7f) This means a trap occurred in kernel mode, and it's a trap of a kind that the kernel isn't allowed to have/catch (bound trap) or that is always instant death (double fault). The first number in the bugcheck params is the number of the trap (8 = double fault, etc) Consult an Intel x86 family manual to learn more about what these traps are. Here is a *portion* of those codes: If kv shows a taskGate use .tss on the part before the colon, then kv. Else if kv shows a trapframe use .trap on that value Else .trap on the appropriate frame will show where the trap was taken (on x86, this will be the ebp that goes with the procedure KiTrap) Endif kb will then show the corrected stack. Arguments: Arg1: 0000000000000008, EXCEPTION_DOUBLE_FAULT Arg2: 0000000080050031 Arg3: 00000000000006f8 Arg4: fffff8000309dec8 Debugging Details: ------------------ BUGCHECK_STR: 0x7f_8 CUSTOMER_CRASH_COUNT: 1 DEFAULT_BUCKET_ID: VISTA_DRIVER_FAULT PROCESS_NAME: System CURRENT_IRQL: 2 LAST_CONTROL_TRANSFER: from fffff800030d4ca9 to fffff800030d5740 STACK_TEXT: fffff880`03169de8 fffff800`030d4ca9 : 00000000`0000007f 00000000`00000008 00000000`80050031 00000000`000006f8 : nt!KeBugCheckEx fffff880`03169df0 fffff800`030d3172 : 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 : nt!KiBugCheckDispatch+0x69 fffff880`03169f30 fffff800`0309dec8 : 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 : nt!KiDoubleFaultAbort+0xb2 fffff880`071b1f90 00000000`00000000 : 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 : nt!SeAccessCheckFromState+0x60 STACK_COMMAND: kb FOLLOWUP_IP: nt!KiDoubleFaultAbort+b2 fffff800`030d3172 90 nop SYMBOL_STACK_INDEX: 2 SYMBOL_NAME: nt!KiDoubleFaultAbort+b2 FOLLOWUP_NAME: MachineOwner MODULE_NAME: nt IMAGE_NAME: ntkrnlmp.exe DEBUG_FLR_IMAGE_TIMESTAMP: 4c1c44a9 FAILURE_BUCKET_ID: X64_0x7f_8_nt!KiDoubleFaultAbort+b2 BUCKET_ID: X64_0x7f_8_nt!KiDoubleFaultAbort+b2 Followup: MachineOwner 2.razlog: NETIO.SYS BugCheck 7F, {8, 80050031, 6f8, fffff8000304fd28} Probably caused by : NETIO.SYS ( NETIO!CompareSecurityContexts+6a ) Followup: MachineOwner --------- 2: kd> !analyze -v ******************************************************************************* * * * Bugcheck Analysis * * * ******************************************************************************* UNEXPECTED_KERNEL_MODE_TRAP (7f) This means a trap occurred in kernel mode, and it's a trap of a kind that the kernel isn't allowed to have/catch (bound trap) or that is always instant death (double fault). The first number in the bugcheck params is the number of the trap (8 = double fault, etc) Consult an Intel x86 family manual to learn more about what these traps are. Here is a *portion* of those codes: If kv shows a taskGate use .tss on the part before the colon, then kv. Else if kv shows a trapframe use .trap on that value Else .trap on the appropriate frame will show where the trap was taken (on x86, this will be the ebp that goes with the procedure KiTrap) Endif kb will then show the corrected stack. Arguments: Arg1: 0000000000000008, EXCEPTION_DOUBLE_FAULT Arg2: 0000000080050031 Arg3: 00000000000006f8 Arg4: fffff8000304fd28 Debugging Details: ------------------ BUGCHECK_STR: 0x7f_8 CUSTOMER_CRASH_COUNT: 1 DEFAULT_BUCKET_ID: VISTA_DRIVER_FAULT PROCESS_NAME: System CURRENT_IRQL: 2 LAST_CONTROL_TRANSFER: from fffff80003086ca9 to fffff80003087740 STACK_TEXT: fffff880`03169de8 fffff800`03086ca9 : 00000000`0000007f 00000000`00000008 00000000`80050031 00000000`000006f8 : nt!KeBugCheckEx fffff880`03169df0 fffff800`03085172 : 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 : nt!KiBugCheckDispatch+0x69 fffff880`03169f30 fffff800`0304fd28 : 0000057c`00000000 0000057c`00000000 0000057c`00000000 0000057c`00000000 : nt!KiDoubleFaultAbort+0xb2 fffff880`03186000 fffff800`0304ff07 : fffffa80`060167c8 00000000`00000001 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 : nt!SepTokenFromAccessInformation+0x20 fffff880`03186030 fffff880`01844c5a : 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 : nt!SeAccessCheckFromState+0x9f fffff880`03186720 fffff880`0184294f : 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 : NETIO!CompareSecurityContexts+0x6a fffff880`03186790 fffff880`018449b5 : 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 : NETIO!MatchValues+0xef fffff880`031867e0 fffff880`01844845 : fffffa80`0750d150 fffffa80`08ab8540 fffff880`03186a08 fffff880`03187140 : NETIO!FilterMatch+0x95 fffff880`03186830 fffff880`01845ccb : 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 fffff880`03187140 fffff880`031869f0 : NETIO!IndexListClassify+0x69 fffff880`031868b0 fffff880`01a40417 : fffff880`03186d88 fffff880`03186d88 fffff880`03187ac0 fffffa80`03de3030 : NETIO!KfdClassify+0xa4e fffff880`03186c20 fffff880`01a3983e : fffff880`01b48690 00000000`00000000 fffffa80`073d3010 00000000`00000000 : tcpip!WfpAleClassify+0x57 fffff880`03186c60 00000000`00000000 : 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 : tcpip!WfpAlepAuthorizeSend+0x94e STACK_COMMAND: kb FOLLOWUP_IP: NETIO!CompareSecurityContexts+6a fffff880`01844c5a 448b442470 mov r8d,dword ptr [rsp+70h] SYMBOL_STACK_INDEX: 5 SYMBOL_NAME: NETIO!CompareSecurityContexts+6a FOLLOWUP_NAME: MachineOwner MODULE_NAME: NETIO IMAGE_NAME: NETIO.SYS DEBUG_FLR_IMAGE_TIMESTAMP: 4bbe946f FAILURE_BUCKET_ID: X64_0x7f_8_NETIO!CompareSecurityContexts+6a BUCKET_ID: X64_0x7f_8_NETIO!CompareSecurityContexts+6a Followup: MachineOwner Dakle NETIO.SYS i ntkrnlmp.exe Što sam probao napraviti do sada, a problem je ostao: -ponovno stavljanje drivera za chipset, graficku, zvucnu, LAN kontroler, raid -vrcenje memstest-a(preko 200% bez errora), occt cpu stress kada bih imao srece da se komp ne srusi(90+minuta) i hdd error scan testa na hdtune programu bez grešaka -stavljanjne zadnjeg BIOS-a na maticnu(F13) -sve postavke vracene na defaultne vrijednosti u BIOS-u -lupanje glavom o zid, dobacivanje svakavih psovki, razumljivih i nerazumljivih ostatku ljudskog roda Još da napomenem da koristim raid 0 polje od 2 hdd-a, jedana particija (manja) je sistmska, dok je druga za sve ostalo. Inace maticna mi je do sada „popapla“ tj. na njoj je crkla X-fi PCI zvucna kartica i 8800GTS graficka, dali same od sebe ili zbog ploce neznam, ono što znam da imam verziju 1.0, a vidio sam na gigabytovoj stranici da postoji i ver. 2.0 Windowsi 7 su na kompu i stari su cca 2-3 mjeseca, dakle relativno friški. Što bi još mogo probat osim reinstalacije windowsa? Raid nebi htio razbijat jer neželim podatke izgubiti....hvala
__________________
|
14.12.2010., 13:42 | #2 |
...samo te gledam...
Datum registracije: Mar 2007
Lokacija: Zagreb
Postovi: 2,746
|
Pročitaj malo o ovome, nisu toga pošteđene ni matične ploče ostalih proizvođača. Mene je mučio taj problem ali samo prilikom prvog boota, sa ulaskom u BIOS i rebootom radilo je sve kako treba. Dakle, ostavi PC ugašen 2-3 sata, upali ga i odmah pokreni Memtest. Ja se nisam mogao načuditi tome, imam problema, uđem u BIOS i promijenim nešto glupo nevezano za RAM, recimo uključim/isključim serijski port i sve radi super. Idući dan kod paljenja opet BSOD. Uglavnom, nagnjavio se 2 mjeseca prije nego što sam uspio rješiti. Napominjem da je Memtest javljao greške samo kod prvog uključivanja PC-a, dakle nakon 2-3 sata mirovanja, nakon toga vrtio Memtest 4-5 sati i sve OK... |
|
|
Oglas
|
|
14.12.2010., 14:30 | #3 |
Freelancer
Datum registracije: Jan 2007
Lokacija: Bilje (Osijek)
Postovi: 4,945
|
I za slucaj da memtest nista ne pronadje probaj sa "gold memory" koji postoji na Hirens boot CDu do verzije 9.5. Meni je taj nasao erorore na Supertalet RAMu unutar 5 minuta a memtest je vrtio cijeli dan bez gresaka . Srecom garancija je prosla bez beda sa fotkama erorra iz GM-a.
__________________
RS1 - MB: WS X299 Asus Sage, CPU: i7 9800X, RAM:128GB, GPUs: 3*RTX 3090 24GB RS2 - MB:Asus X99-E WS, CPU: i7 6850K, RAM:128GB, GPUs: 2*RTX 4090 24GB |
14.12.2010., 22:23 | #4 |
Premium
Datum registracije: Feb 2005
Lokacija: Zagreb
Postovi: 2,138
|
Evo probao sam gold memory-ne nelazi greške, ali niti nije bio cold boot-isto kao s memtestom. Sutra ujutro cu probat memtest i gold memory s cold boot-om pa cemo vidjet kaj bu bilo. @Sinac citao sam malo postove s linka kojeg si mi dao, koliko sam skužio vecina ljudi tamo ima probleme kod cold boota i masu njih nemoze uopce uc u windowse iz prve, to nije slucaj kod mene, meni normalno svaki put uđe u win a tek onda se srusi nakon odredjenog vremena rada. No probat cu i cold boot memtest i gold memory, sutra update... hvala na prijedlozima
__________________
|
16.12.2010., 10:48 | #5 |
Premium
Datum registracije: Feb 2005
Lokacija: Zagreb
Postovi: 2,138
|
evo update-a sa cold boot-om niti memtest niti gold memory nisu pronašli greške. zadnjih dan i pol/dva(cca 40-ak sati) nije mi se dogodio niti jedan BSOD, a nisam ništa mijenjao, dakle sve je ostalo isto kao i kada su se BSOD-i događali ovo postaje frustrirajuce jer neznam na cemu se nalazim i kaj se događa, nekako imam osjecaj da ce me opet pogoditi BSOD-i za mjesec/dva. nabavio sam dve gige(2x1GB) druge ddr3 memorije od frenda no kako nije bilo bsod-a neznam uopce dal da ih probavam... Mozda još koji prijedlog/savjet?
__________________
|
25.12.2010., 13:14 | #8 |
Premium
Datum registracije: Jan 2008
Lokacija: Zagreb
Postovi: 55
|
driver problem
To je najvjerojatnije problem do drivera. CAUSE This problem occurs if one or more of the processors in the computer: •Require a microcode update that is not applied by the computer's basic input/output system (BIOS). •Are damaged or defective. •Are operating outside their specified ranges for temperature, power, or other conditions. Probaj staviti nešto stariju inačicu biosa, a mogao bi i obavijestiti proizvođača matične o tim greškama. Probaj reinstalaciju (znam da je long way arround), sa driverima koji su ti ranije radili bez problema. I nemoj instalirati nove drivere samo zato da bi bili zadnji izdani.. novo može biti i nedovoljno istestirano. Najbolje instaliraj drivere za ploču sa njezinog CD-a, kao i za grafičku. Provjeri uvijek pri update-u drivera što je točno izmijenjeno u njima i ako uopće - koliko dobiješ na performansama i znači li ti recimo 1% toliko. |
|
|
Oglas
|
Oglasni prostor
|
|
|