Vijesti i novosti o Intel procesorima i čipsetima

[Eladio]

ma cijene su "skupe", ali brijem da će to u biti dosta solidno ići..
AMD više nije toliko puno moćniji/isplativiji/sto god,
voda je zamućenija, a kad je voda zamućena ljudi kazu kupi intel ili nvidiju ..tako da nazalost ovo ce biti dovoljno da smiri loptu

[Manuel Calavera]

Demetrius na tog sam i mislio, krivo sam napisao, uglavnom lockana čista hexa. Najbolji deal od te ergele.

Navodni leak i7 8700K recenzije

https://videocardz.com/72915/first-r...700k-leaks-out

@Eladio

To je normalno, nije baš realno očekivati da će amd održati veću prodaju od jednog intela. To mislim na mainstream (većinom gamere), što se tiče hedt-a tu mislim da je x299 najebao, a i sa epycom će vjerojatno natuć ogromnu lovu za svoje standarde.

[Wolverine]

Ekšli evo kak ameri/kanađani razmišljaju. Firma di radim hoće upgrade par kompova i složio sam im konfe bazirane na R5 1400 / 1600 procevima.

Ovo im je vratio lik kod kojeg hoće uzet komponente.

I have prepared three different quotation as well as put some note in the word document. Although the AMD is cheaper option, but nothing came close with Intel’s stability and it will not work with Windows 7.

Kaj je ponudio, tak jasno platformu baziranu na Intel Core i5 6500 i još u ponudi veli kak je Intel quad core brži od AMD quad core procesora

Dio kak Windows 7 ne radi na Skylake platformi neću ni spominjat

[markecSMB]

Autor Wolverine

Ekšli evo kak ameri/kanađani razmišljaju. Firma di radim hoće upgrade par kompova i složio sam im konfe bazirane na R5 1400 / 1600 procevima.

Ovo im je vratio lik kod kojeg hoće uzet komponente.



Kaj je ponudio, tak jasno platformu baziranu na Intel Core i5 6500 i još u ponudi veli kak je Intel quad core brži od AMD quad core procesora

Dio kak Windows 7 ne radi na Skylake platformi neću ni spominjat

I taj tvoj doživljaj ima veze s temom?

[Sinac]

Autor markecSMB

I taj tvoj doživljaj ima veze s temom?

Istaknuo je kako postoje kupci koji će jahati na Intelu kroz pustinju, prašumu, vatru i vodu bez obzira što na tržištu postoji jednako dobro ako ne i bolje rješenje.

[Manuel Calavera]

Kaže mi kolega koji ima frenda koji radi u intelovoj tvornici u Irskoj (neki basic radnik sa wafferima) da su neki dan zvali radnike "na razgovor" i krenili otpuštati.

Zanimljiva je priča kako je dobio posao. Kaže taman se nije snašao i spremao se na odlazak iz Irske, a imao je još jedan razgovor za posao (to u intelu). Kad su ga pitali jel zna raditi sa šarafcigerom, uvrijedo se, ustao i ošao sa sa razgovora. I onda ga uskoro zvali da je dobio posao

[Brko]

Autor Sinac

Istaknuo je kako postoje kupci koji će jahati na Intelu kroz pustinju, prašumu, vatru i vodu bez obzira što na tržištu postoji jednako dobro ako ne i bolje rješenje.

Vredni soldati

@mob

[Amd_Shill]

Autor Wolverine

Ekšli evo kak ameri/kanađani razmišljaju. Firma di radim hoće upgrade par kompova i složio sam im konfe bazirane na R5 1400 / 1600 procevima.

Ovo im je vratio lik kod kojeg hoće uzet komponente.



Kaj je ponudio, tak jasno platformu baziranu na Intel Core i5 6500 i još u ponudi veli kak je Intel quad core brži od AMD quad core procesora

Dio kak Windows 7 ne radi na Skylake platformi neću ni spominjat

Trebace još vremena da se promjeni mišljenje neupućenih da je Intel bolje rješenje.
Trenutačno nije i nema naznaka da će se to promijeniti u bliskoj budućnosti.

[Wolverine]

Autor markecSMB

I taj tvoj doživljaj ima veze s temom?

Nadovezuje se na dio gdje smo pricali o tome kako ce i dalje ekipa cesce kupovat Intel cisto zbog misljenja kako je bolji. Tj ekipa koja eksli prati stvari cini izrazito mali postotak populacije.

[prileee]

Primjer s foruma: "nebi od amda nista"

[nub]

Autor Manuel Calavera

Intel Readies Core i3-7360X, A Dual Core Kaby Lake-X Processor For The X299 Platform – Features 4.0 GHz Clock Speed and 112W TDP

Najjači release godine. Evo jedan hajlajt iz texta:
The chip would cost around $220 US. That is much higher than the Core i3-7350K which retails around $170 US. Performance wise, the chip is stated to be just 1.25% faster than the Core i3-7350K so basically the same chip on a different platform.

[Gigi1]

Autor Wolverine

Oni nisu jebeno normalni s ciframa
https://www.anandtech.com/show/11869...top-processors

prva dva kometara ispod clanka

Eight generations of being a little bitch. What a legacy!

After over 10 years of being stuck at 4 cores in the mainstream, intel finally has 6 and they plan on having 8 next year.

I love how fangirls say this has nothing to do with amd being competitive, and is just intel's typical same old strive for innovation.

i9 rivjui su vani, na nexusu su ih delidali...

https://www.gamersnexus.net/hwreview...s-power-review

kao sto se ocekivalo TR jaci u perf/watt

Intel does manage to definitively claim the highest performing slots in our benchmarks, but also manages to claim the award for consuming the most power, using the worst stock thermal solution, and requiring more money to be spent on CLCs or high-end coolers. Where the company gains single to low double-digit percentage performance jaunts, it also gains triple-digit power consumption increases. Overclocking headroom is tremendous, making the Intel i9-7960X a serious enthusiast option and a lot of fun to work with, but it does require modifications to truly tap into performance. Yes, 4.6GHz overclocks can be achieved stock – but not easily, and often with loud cooling solutions. With liquid metal, we dropped those cooler requirements down to 280mm X62 units with reasonable noise levels. With LM, we were pushing 4.7GHz to 4.8GHz on 1.24-1.25VID, reaping remarkable performance leaps of ~25-30% over stock. That’s impressive.

But again, it’s at the cost of 500W down the EPS12V cables, upwards of 615W, in some tests. It’s also at the cost of $700 more than a Threadripper 1950X CPU. If you’re the type to genuinely overclock a CPU and leave it at the upper-end of its clocks and performance, the i9-7960X runs away from the TR 1950X. If you’re the type to use a CPU stock, well, depending on the test, the TR 1950X may be a better value for money. This even applies to the type who might not care about initial cost: We’re talking single-digit percentages in some cases, but for significantly more power consumed. Overclocking is a different story, as is Premiere. Our Premiere benchmark is a major shining light for the CPU (but also shows the 7980XE as producing diminishing returns), roughly halving the render time with CUDA from the 1950X results we have. But this is also heavily project-oriented, and our project is not representative of all performance in Premiere. Please keep that in mind.

It’s hard to outright recommend either of these two CPUs. There are places where they’re good, and the above data should help you determine whether that fits your needs. There are also places where they’re woefully power inefficient compared to nearby rival Threadripper, which also must factor into the decision.

[Manuel Calavera]