3.5" SATA HDD-ovi od 2.5 do 4 TB

[microsoft66]

Autor The Exiled

Moguće je, SMR je već par godina aktualan, ali ih dosad nitko nije prokužil dok nisu počeli i NAS diskove trpati s tim.

Jel znas jel u ovom disku smr?




Btw,dosao mi red 4tb pa ga isprobam kroz koji dan

[The Exiled]

Jedini 2TB 7.200rpm BarraCuda model za koji je Seagate priznal da ima SMR je ST2000DM008, dok je ovaj tvoj ST2000DM006, tak da bi trebal biti OK.

[microsoft66]

stigao mi wd red 4tb efrx i problemi



kad ga spojim na sata3 utor,prvo klikće pa zuji i nekako se došulja do windowsa i onda prestane zujat i kliktat ali ga windowsi nevide...kad opet opalim restart ponavlja se isto...PC je međuvremenu znatno usporen.

na tom sata 3 ulazu mi drugi disk od 2 tb radi bez problema..

sutra cu probati na drugom PC-u pa javim jesu li isti simptomi

[Blue Spirit]

WD Sets the Record Straight: Lists All Drives That Use Slower SMR Tech

https://www.tomshardware.com/news/wd...smr-techNOLOGY

Network-Attached Storage or NAS devices have become critical for homes and small businesses that need to find a larger and more reliable storage solution.
These often use high-capacity, high-speed hard drives in RAIDs (Redundant Array of Independent Disks) for data reliability and integrity.
Imagine the surprise, then, of some NAS users when their favorite brand’s NAS drive starts to behave poorly in such a RAID setup.

The culprit, it turns out, is the technology known as Shingled Magnetic Recording or SMR.
Unlike Conventional Magnetic Recording (CMR), SMR overlaps tracks a bit when writing data to a platter, creating a structure that resembles the shingles on a roof, hence the name.
The compact structure is great for increasing the capacity of a hard drive but it comes at the cost of performance.
You can only read and write on SMR drives sequentially because you can’t write to a track underneath another without potentially damaging the data on the upper track.

That makes SMR drives a poor choice for RAIDs where random access I/O is more the norm.
Unfortunately, a report from the Blocks and Files site reveals that Western Digital’s Red NAS drive is actually using SMR even if it doesn’t state it in any documentation.
WD isn’t the only culprit, though, as both Seagate as well as Toshiba also later admitted some of their drives marketed for NAS use employ a technique that is known to be bad for NAS use.

None of these three HDD makers find anything wrong with the little white lies. They basically claim that what they explicitly advertise and document is “consistent” with the drives’ performance. NAS users, however, might beg to differ.

https://www.slashgear.com/wd-seagate...yers-17617133/

[domy_os]

Znači takvih gluposti (zasad) nema u Gold seriji?

[microsoft66]

wd 4tb nemogu nikako "vidjeti" windowsi

spojio normlano sata utorom,odem na disk menagment i kad treba odabrati MBR ili GPT dobijem ovaj error dolje na obje opcije



u bios-u sata opcija stoji na AHCI, jer IDE uopce nece da boot a onda bios ni nevidi WD disk tako da AHCI opcija mora biti ukljucena

sistem je win10 pro 64bit

pokusao ga spojiti na isti port gdje inace spojim 2tb koji normalno radi i nece

spojio na drugi sata port sa drugim sata kablom i opet isto

ikakvi prijedlozi?

[Brko]

Desni klik na ovo gdje piše "Disk 0 Unknown Not Initialized" oa odabrati "Initialize" ??? Jesi probao to?

[microsoft66]

Da, i onda javlja tu gresku,sta god izabrao

[The Exiled]

Izgleda da je disk DOA, tj. potrefil te sfušani primjerak. Reklamiraj ga dok još možeš, uzmi novi i voljno. Nema smisla da se zajebavaš danima, a disk očito ne radi kak spada.

Autor domy_os

Znači takvih gluposti (zasad) nema u Gold seriji?

Autor The Exiled

Mislim da su Red Pro, Gold i Ultrastar još uvijek CMR (barem dok ih ne sjebu SMR-om), ali ovi WD biseri zapravo tjeraju ljude da kupe skuplje diskove, ako im SMR ne paše. U svakom slučaju ih ne *ebe ni 5%.

[microsoft66]

To mi je vec reklamirani disk pa kakve su mogucnosti da su 2 zaredom losa?

Ici cu danas do brata pa probat na njegovom pc-u