Nvidia Quadro/RTX series

[Bubba]

Samo kratak info, prije izvjesnog vremena ubacio sam dva fantasticna nVidia produkta, low-end Quadroice bazirane na Pascalu, P400 (najslabija) verzija, puta dva. Cijenom su mi bile i vise nego pogodne, ne trose skoro nista, i ne cuju se kada ne treba. 3x mini DP, gutaju i DP, i DVI (pa samim time i HDMI), i VGA.

Samo malo podataka, fotki i slicno.

hashcat (v3.40) starting in benchmark mode...

* Device #1: Not a native Intel OpenCL runtime, expect massive speed loss
             You can use --force to override this but do not post error reports if you do so
* Device #2: WARNING! Kernel exec timeout is not disabled, it might cause you errors of code CL_OUT_OF_RESOURCES
             See the wiki on how to disable it: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=timeout_patch
* Device #3: WARNING! Kernel exec timeout is not disabled, it might cause you errors of code CL_OUT_OF_RESOURCES
             See the wiki on how to disable it: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=timeout_patch
nvmlDeviceGetPowerManagementLimit(): Not Supported

nvmlDeviceGetPowerManagementLimit(): Not Supported

OpenCL Platform #1: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
================================================
* Device #1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1231 v3 @ 3.40GHz, skipped

OpenCL Platform #2: NVIDIA Corporation
======================================
* Device #2: Quadro P400, 512/2048 MB allocatable, 2MCU
* Device #3: Quadro P400, 512/2048 MB allocatable, 2MCU

Hashtype: MD4

Speed.Dev.#2.....:  2477.6 MH/s (54.07ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:  2537.5 MH/s (52.73ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:  5015.2 MH/s

Hashtype: MD5

Speed.Dev.#2.....:  1448.5 MH/s (92.54ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:  1484.5 MH/s (90.22ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:  2933.0 MH/s

Hashtype: Half MD5

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   958.8 MH/s (69.91ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   979.8 MH/s (68.32ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:  1938.6 MH/s

Hashtype: SHA1

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   531.1 MH/s (63.08ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   545.0 MH/s (61.40ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:  1076.1 MH/s

Hashtype: SHA256

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   206.2 MH/s (80.94ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   211.6 MH/s (78.76ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   417.8 MH/s

Hashtype: SHA384

Speed.Dev.#2.....: 69899.6 kH/s (59.85ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....: 71274.8 kH/s (58.65ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   141.2 MH/s

Hashtype: SHA512

Speed.Dev.#2.....: 70650.4 kH/s (59.15ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....: 73033.5 kH/s (57.21ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   143.7 MH/s

Hashtype: SHA-3(Keccak)

Speed.Dev.#2.....: 57256.0 kH/s (73.06ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....: 58897.1 kH/s (70.92ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   116.2 MH/s

Hashtype: SipHash

Speed.Dev.#2.....:  1896.7 MH/s (70.62ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:  1951.1 MH/s (68.53ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:  3847.9 MH/s

Hashtype: Skip32

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   396.0 MH/s (42.16ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   421.0 MH/s (39.66ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   816.9 MH/s

Hashtype: RipeMD160

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   315.9 MH/s (52.82ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   320.7 MH/s (51.32ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   636.5 MH/s

Hashtype: Whirlpool

Speed.Dev.#2.....: 16698.8 kH/s (125.49ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....: 17245.2 kH/s (121.42ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....: 33944.0 kH/s

Hashtype: GOST R 34.11-94

Speed.Dev.#2.....: 15845.2 kH/s (132.27ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....: 16316.1 kH/s (128.31ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....: 32161.3 kH/s

Hashtype: GOST R 34.11-2012 (Streebog) 256-bit

Speed.Dev.#2.....:  3311.2 kH/s (312.83ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:  3416.5 kH/s (303.09ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:  6727.6 kH/s

Hashtype: GOST R 34.11-2012 (Streebog) 512-bit

Speed.Dev.#2.....:  3314.6 kH/s (312.51ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:  3419.2 kH/s (302.86ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:  6733.7 kH/s

Hashtype: DES (PT = $salt, key = $pass)

Speed.Dev.#2.....:  1322.2 MH/s (50.44ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:  1362.6 MH/s (48.95ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:  2684.8 MH/s

Hashtype: 3DES (PT = $salt, key = $pass)

Speed.Dev.#2.....: 38603.4 kH/s (54.24ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....: 39880.5 kH/s (52.38ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....: 78483.9 kH/s

Hashtype: phpass, MD5(Wordpress), MD5(phpBB3), MD5(Joomla)

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   454.7 kH/s (70.54ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   475.2 kH/s (67.92ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   929.9 kH/s

Hashtype: scrypt

Speed.Dev.#2.....:    57169 H/s (17.23ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:    58609 H/s (16.67ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   115.8 kH/s

Hashtype: PBKDF2-HMAC-MD5

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   503.0 kH/s (63.43ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   518.9 kH/s (61.71ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:  1021.9 kH/s

Hashtype: PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA1

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   222.5 kH/s (60.58ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   228.4 kH/s (58.87ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   450.9 kH/s

Hashtype: PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA256

Speed.Dev.#2.....:    81696 H/s (45.39ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:    84643 H/s (83.97ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   166.3 kH/s

Hashtype: PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA512

Speed.Dev.#2.....:    30476 H/s (62.56ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:    31386 H/s (60.69ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:    61861 H/s

Hashtype: Skype

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   851.0 MH/s (78.77ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   874.4 MH/s (76.56ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:  1725.3 MH/s

Hashtype: WPA/WPA2

Speed.Dev.#2.....:    27359 H/s (74.44ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:    28183 H/s (72.29ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:    55542 H/s

Hashtype: IKE-PSK MD5

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   114.4 MH/s (73.16ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   119.7 MH/s (69.99ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   234.0 MH/s

Hashtype: IKE-PSK SHA1

Speed.Dev.#2.....: 52769.0 kH/s (78.94ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....: 54724.6 kH/s (76.38ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   107.5 MH/s

Hashtype: NetNTLMv1-VANILLA / NetNTLMv1+ESS

Speed.Dev.#2.....:  1433.4 MH/s (93.54ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:  1476.4 MH/s (90.77ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:  2909.7 MH/s

Hashtype: NetNTLMv2

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   107.6 MH/s (77.82ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   110.7 MH/s (75.56ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   218.4 MH/s

Hashtype: IPMI2 RAKP HMAC-SHA1

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   114.3 MH/s (73.29ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   117.1 MH/s (71.48ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   231.4 MH/s

Hashtype: Kerberos 5 AS-REQ Pre-Auth etype 23

Speed.Dev.#2.....: 19158.7 kH/s (54.47ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....: 20104.2 kH/s (104.11ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....: 39262.8 kH/s

Hashtype: Kerberos 5 TGS-REP etype 23

Speed.Dev.#2.....: 19133.2 kH/s (54.55ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....: 20077.4 kH/s (104.26ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....: 39210.5 kH/s

Hashtype: DNSSEC (NSEC3)

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   223.0 MH/s (74.84ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   230.4 MH/s (72.31ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   453.5 MH/s

Hashtype: PostgreSQL Challenge-Response Authentication (MD5)

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   389.0 MH/s (86.08ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   401.2 MH/s (83.43ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   790.2 MH/s

Hashtype: MySQL Challenge-Response Authentication (SHA1)

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   155.0 MH/s (53.97ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   160.1 MH/s (52.12ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   315.2 MH/s

Hashtype: SIP digest authentication (MD5)

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   130.1 MH/s (64.38ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   134.0 MH/s (62.40ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   264.1 MH/s

Hashtype: SMF > v1.1

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   453.1 MH/s (73.95ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   465.4 MH/s (71.88ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   918.5 MH/s

Hashtype: vBulletin < v3.8.5

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   456.2 MH/s (73.46ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   469.5 MH/s (71.26ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   925.7 MH/s

Hashtype: vBulletin > v3.8.5

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   316.3 MH/s (52.74ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   325.3 MH/s (51.20ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   641.6 MH/s

Hashtype: IPB2+, MyBB1.2+

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   327.7 MH/s (50.90ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   336.2 MH/s (49.50ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   663.9 MH/s

Hashtype: WBB3, Woltlab Burning Board 3

Speed.Dev.#2.....: 89235.4 kH/s (93.83ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....: 91825.6 kH/s (91.09ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   181.1 MH/s

Hashtype: OpenCart

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   140.3 MH/s (59.70ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   144.1 MH/s (58.03ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   284.4 MH/s

Hashtype: Joomla < 2.5.18

Speed.Dev.#2.....:  1446.5 MH/s (92.68ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:  1489.0 MH/s (89.97ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:  2935.5 MH/s

Hashtype: PHPS

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   456.7 MH/s (73.37ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   470.0 MH/s (71.21ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   926.7 MH/s

Hashtype: Drupal7

Speed.Dev.#2.....:     3739 H/s (67.66ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:     3856 H/s (65.61ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:     7594 H/s

Hashtype: osCommerce, xt:Commerce

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   849.4 MH/s (78.84ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   873.5 MH/s (76.62ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:  1722.9 MH/s

Hashtype: PrestaShop

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   565.2 MH/s (59.29ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   580.4 MH/s (57.65ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:  1145.5 MH/s

Hashtype: Django (SHA-1)

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   452.9 MH/s (73.95ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   465.7 MH/s (71.85ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   918.6 MH/s

Hashtype: Django (PBKDF2-SHA256)

Speed.Dev.#2.....:     4100 H/s (50.60ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:     4237 H/s (49.05ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:     8337 H/s

Hashtype: Mediawiki B type

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   421.9 MH/s (79.44ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   434.3 MH/s (77.13ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   856.2 MH/s

Hashtype: Redmine Project Management Web App

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   183.1 MH/s (91.14ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   188.6 MH/s (88.38ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   371.8 MH/s

Hashtype: PunBB

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   183.1 MH/s (91.16ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   188.6 MH/s (88.43ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   371.7 MH/s

Hashtype: PostgreSQL

Speed.Dev.#2.....:  1447.3 MH/s (92.62ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:  1487.0 MH/s (89.98ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:  2934.3 MH/s

Hashtype: MSSQL(2000)

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   546.9 MH/s (61.24ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   562.4 MH/s (59.50ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:  1109.3 MH/s

Hashtype: MSSQL(2005)

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   546.5 MH/s (61.31ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   562.5 MH/s (59.49ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:  1109.0 MH/s

Hashtype: MSSQL(2012)

Speed.Dev.#2.....: 67866.2 kH/s (61.64ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....: 69676.9 kH/s (59.98ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   137.5 MH/s

Hashtype: MySQL323

Speed.Dev.#2.....:  3165.3 MH/s (84.71ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:  3262.1 MH/s (82.08ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:  6427.4 MH/s

Hashtype: MySQL4.1/MySQL5

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   248.0 MH/s (67.27ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   254.8 MH/s (65.43ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   502.8 MH/s

Hashtype: Oracle H: Type (Oracle 7+)

Speed.Dev.#2.....: 67205.6 kH/s (62.06ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....: 68921.7 kH/s (60.41ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   136.1 MH/s

Hashtype: Oracle S: Type (Oracle 11+)

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   529.6 MH/s (63.26ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   546.2 MH/s (61.26ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:  1075.8 MH/s

Hashtype: Oracle T: Type (Oracle 12+)

Speed.Dev.#2.....:     7506 H/s (67.94ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:     7707 H/s (66.18ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:    15212 H/s

Hashtype: Sybase ASE

Speed.Dev.#2.....: 19181.3 kH/s (53.92ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....: 19626.6 kH/s (52.67ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....: 38807.9 kH/s

Hashtype: EPiServer 6.x < v4

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   457.9 MH/s (73.19ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   465.8 MH/s (71.86ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   923.8 MH/s

Hashtype: EPiServer 6.x > v4

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   185.9 MH/s (89.79ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   189.3 MH/s (88.13ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   375.2 MH/s

Hashtype: md5apr1, MD5(APR), Apache MD5

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   684.8 kH/s (94.01ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   697.8 kH/s (92.17ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:  1382.7 kH/s

Hashtype: ColdFusion 10+

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   121.1 MH/s (69.21ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   122.6 MH/s (68.29ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   243.6 MH/s

Hashtype: hMailServer

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   185.9 MH/s (89.79ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   189.3 MH/s (88.11ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   375.2 MH/s

Hashtype: SHA-1(Base64), nsldap, Netscape LDAP SHA

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   535.7 MH/s (62.48ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   546.3 MH/s (61.24ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:  1082.1 MH/s

Hashtype: SSHA-1(Base64), nsldaps, Netscape LDAP SSHA

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   535.6 MH/s (62.49ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   545.6 MH/s (61.22ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:  1081.2 MH/s

Hashtype: SSHA-256(Base64), LDAP {SSHA256}

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   208.0 MH/s (80.21ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   212.0 MH/s (78.58ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   420.0 MH/s

Hashtype: SSHA-512(Base64), LDAP {SSHA512}

Speed.Dev.#2.....: 71706.9 kH/s (58.33ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....: 73173.3 kH/s (57.08ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   144.9 MH/s

Hashtype: LM

Speed.Dev.#2.....:  1331.4 MH/s (50.10ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:  1358.9 MH/s (48.99ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:  2690.3 MH/s

Hashtype: NTLM

Speed.Dev.#2.....:  2492.5 MH/s (53.74ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:  2540.2 MH/s (52.67ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:  5032.6 MH/s

Hashtype: Domain Cached Credentials (DCC), MS Cache

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   724.5 MH/s (92.52ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   737.1 MH/s (90.77ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:  1461.6 MH/s

Hashtype: Domain Cached Credentials 2 (DCC2), MS Cache 2

Speed.Dev.#2.....:    22367 H/s (71.31ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:    22907 H/s (69.84ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:    45274 H/s

Hashtype: MS-AzureSync PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA256

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   783.8 kH/s (69.42ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   803.7 kH/s (67.87ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:  1587.6 kH/s

Hashtype: descrypt, DES(Unix), Traditional DES

Speed.Dev.#2.....: 65275.8 kH/s (63.99ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....: 66420.0 kH/s (62.63ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   131.7 MH/s

Hashtype: BSDiCrypt, Extended DES

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   102.4 kH/s (105.83ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   104.4 kH/s (103.91ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   206.8 kH/s

Hashtype: md5crypt, MD5(Unix), FreeBSD MD5, Cisco-IOS MD5

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   685.9 kH/s (93.95ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   697.9 kH/s (92.23ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:  1383.7 kH/s

Hashtype: bcrypt, Blowfish(OpenBSD)

Speed.Dev.#2.....:     1030 H/s (30.14ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:     1053 H/s (29.46ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:     2083 H/s

Hashtype: sha256crypt, SHA256(Unix)

Speed.Dev.#2.....:    25854 H/s (62.61ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:    26386 H/s (61.36ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:    52239 H/s

Hashtype: sha512crypt, SHA512(Unix)

Speed.Dev.#2.....:    11094 H/s (74.29ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:    11329 H/s (72.76ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:    22423 H/s

Hashtype: OSX v10.4, v10.5, v10.6

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   456.5 MH/s (73.42ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   466.3 MH/s (71.80ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   922.8 MH/s

Hashtype: OSX v10.7

Speed.Dev.#2.....: 63220.5 kH/s (66.20ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....: 64304.7 kH/s (64.92ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   127.5 MH/s

Hashtype: OSX v10.8+

Speed.Dev.#2.....:      873 H/s (67.77ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:      898 H/s (66.31ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:     1771 H/s

Hashtype: AIX {smd5}

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   685.1 kH/s (93.94ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   697.6 kH/s (92.12ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:  1382.7 kH/s

Hashtype: AIX {ssha1}

Speed.Dev.#2.....:  3177.0 kH/s (72.84ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:  3239.7 kH/s (71.40ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:  6416.7 kH/s

Hashtype: AIX {ssha256}

Speed.Dev.#2.....:  1143.5 kH/s (53.71ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:  1168.1 kH/s (52.58ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:  2311.6 kH/s

Hashtype: AIX {ssha512}

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   460.3 kH/s (67.42ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   469.1 kH/s (65.92ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   929.4 kH/s

Hashtype: Cisco-PIX MD5

Speed.Dev.#2.....:  1070.5 MH/s (62.58ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:  1091.9 MH/s (61.35ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:  2162.4 MH/s

Hashtype: Cisco-ASA MD5

Speed.Dev.#2.....:  1091.0 MH/s (61.43ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:  1111.0 MH/s (60.25ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:  2202.0 MH/s

Hashtype: Cisco-IOS SHA256

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   208.2 MH/s (80.17ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   212.2 MH/s (78.57ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   420.4 MH/s

Hashtype: Cisco $8$

Speed.Dev.#2.....:     4156 H/s (50.04ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:     4218 H/s (49.06ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:     8374 H/s

Hashtype: Cisco $9$

Speed.Dev.#2.....:      886 H/s (576.93ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:      905 H/s (565.10ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:     1791 H/s

Hashtype: Juniper Netscreen/SSG (ScreenOS)

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   842.4 MH/s (79.56ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   859.7 MH/s (77.86ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:  1702.1 MH/s

Hashtype: Juniper IVE

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   684.8 kH/s (93.98ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   698.0 kH/s (92.07ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:  1382.8 kH/s

Hashtype: Android PIN

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   370.4 kH/s (87.33ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   378.0 kH/s (85.47ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   748.5 kH/s

Hashtype: Citrix NetScaler

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   495.5 MH/s (67.61ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   505.5 MH/s (66.28ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:  1001.0 MH/s

Hashtype: RACF

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   179.6 MH/s (93.32ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   184.5 MH/s (90.73ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   364.1 MH/s

Hashtype: GRUB 2

Speed.Dev.#2.....:     3058 H/s (67.66ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:     3132 H/s (66.32ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:     6191 H/s

Hashtype: Radmin2

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   534.4 MH/s (62.71ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   546.4 MH/s (61.22ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:  1080.8 MH/s

Hashtype: SAP CODVN B (BCODE)

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   175.7 MH/s (94.96ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   178.8 MH/s (93.23ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   354.5 MH/s

Hashtype: SAP CODVN F/G (PASSCODE)

Speed.Dev.#2.....: 76288.3 kH/s (109.84ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....: 77884.3 kH/s (107.55ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   154.2 MH/s

Hashtype: SAP CODVN H (PWDSALTEDHASH) iSSHA-1

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   415.4 kH/s (77.83ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   423.5 kH/s (76.26ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   838.9 kH/s

Hashtype: Lotus Notes/Domino 5

Speed.Dev.#2.....: 14385.8 kH/s (143.79ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....: 14503.5 kH/s (144.50ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....: 28889.4 kH/s

Hashtype: Lotus Notes/Domino 6

Speed.Dev.#2.....:  4764.0 kH/s (109.91ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:  4861.6 kH/s (107.62ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:  9625.6 kH/s

Hashtype: Lotus Notes/Domino 8

Speed.Dev.#2.....:    45594 H/s (71.07ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:    46485 H/s (69.70ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:    92080 H/s

Hashtype: PeopleSoft

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   552.0 MH/s (60.69ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   562.5 MH/s (59.47ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:  1114.5 MH/s

Hashtype: PeopleSoft PS_TOKEN

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   217.4 MH/s (76.78ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   221.4 MH/s (75.29ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   438.8 MH/s

Hashtype: 7-Zip

Speed.Dev.#2.....:      625 H/s (49.15ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:      653 H/s (95.37ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:     1278 H/s

Hashtype: WinZip

Speed.Dev.#2.....:    75944 H/s (49.01ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:    77390 H/s (48.06ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   153.3 kH/s

Hashtype: RAR3-hp

Speed.Dev.#2.....:     2487 H/s (51.21ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:     2578 H/s (49.33ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:     5065 H/s

Hashtype: RAR5

Speed.Dev.#2.....:     2512 H/s (50.04ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:     2570 H/s (48.98ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:     5082 H/s

Hashtype: AxCrypt

Speed.Dev.#2.....:     7716 H/s (215.85ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:     7903 H/s (211.04ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:    15620 H/s

Hashtype: AxCrypt in memory SHA1

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   514.1 MH/s (65.13ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   524.9 MH/s (63.80ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:  1039.0 MH/s

Hashtype: TrueCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-RipeMD160 + XTS 512 bit

Speed.Dev.#2.....:    18724 H/s (51.93ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:    19111 H/s (50.90ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:    37834 H/s

Hashtype: TrueCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA512 + XTS 512 bit

Speed.Dev.#2.....:    28810 H/s (61.42ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:    29390 H/s (60.22ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:    58199 H/s

Hashtype: TrueCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-Whirlpool + XTS 512 bit

Speed.Dev.#2.....:     2382 H/s (211.55ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:     2441 H/s (206.38ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:     4823 H/s

Hashtype: TrueCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-RipeMD160 + XTS 512 bit + boot-mode

Speed.Dev.#2.....:    35678 H/s (48.85ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:    36387 H/s (47.91ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:    72064 H/s

Hashtype: VeraCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-RipeMD160 + XTS 512 bit

Speed.Dev.#2.....:       31 H/s (53.17ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:       31 H/s (52.12ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:       62 H/s

Hashtype: VeraCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA512 + XTS 512 bit

Speed.Dev.#2.....:       31 H/s (67.16ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:       62 H/s (65.82ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:       93 H/s

Hashtype: VeraCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-Whirlpool + XTS 512 bit

Speed.Dev.#2.....:        0 H/s (213.33ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:        0 H/s (208.71ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:        0 H/s

Hashtype: VeraCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-RipeMD160 + XTS 512 bit + boot-mode

Speed.Dev.#2.....:       93 H/s (53.19ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:       93 H/s (52.15ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:      186 H/s

Hashtype: VeraCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA256 + XTS 512 bit

Speed.Dev.#2.....:       62 H/s (53.25ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:       62 H/s (52.14ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:      124 H/s

Hashtype: VeraCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA256 + XTS 512 bit + boot-mode

Speed.Dev.#2.....:      186 H/s (53.24ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:      186 H/s (52.09ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:      372 H/s

Hashtype: Android FDE <= 4.3

Speed.Dev.#2.....:    56209 H/s (71.96ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:    57411 H/s (70.51ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   113.6 kH/s

Hashtype: Android FDE (Samsung DEK)

Speed.Dev.#2.....:    20298 H/s (49.02ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:    20761 H/s (47.94ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:    41060 H/s

Hashtype: eCryptfs

Speed.Dev.#2.....:      928 H/s (66.52ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:      962 H/s (65.21ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:     1890 H/s

Hashtype: MS Office <= 2003 MD5 + RC4, oldoffice$0, oldoffice$1

Speed.Dev.#2.....: 15138.0 kH/s (69.09ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....: 15438.3 kH/s (67.63ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....: 30576.4 kH/s

Hashtype: MS Office <= 2003 MD5 + RC4, collision-mode #1

Speed.Dev.#2.....: 21390.5 kH/s (97.77ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....: 22107.0 kH/s (94.63ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....: 43497.5 kH/s

Hashtype: MS Office <= 2003 SHA1 + RC4, oldoffice$3, oldoffice$4

Speed.Dev.#2.....: 20085.4 kH/s (104.20ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....: 20547.2 kH/s (101.77ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....: 40632.5 kH/s

Hashtype: MS Office <= 2003 SHA1 + RC4, collision-mode #1

Speed.Dev.#2.....: 22165.4 kH/s (94.51ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....: 22632.7 kH/s (92.42ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....: 44798.2 kH/s

Hashtype: Office 2007

Speed.Dev.#2.....:     8994 H/s (74.23ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:     9153 H/s (72.81ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:    18147 H/s

Hashtype: Office 2010

Speed.Dev.#2.....:     4483 H/s (74.27ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:     4553 H/s (72.80ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:     9035 H/s

Hashtype: Office 2013

Speed.Dev.#2.....:      622 H/s (66.16ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:      625 H/s (64.81ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:     1247 H/s

Hashtype: PDF 1.1 - 1.3 (Acrobat 2 - 4)

Speed.Dev.#2.....: 22742.7 kH/s (91.99ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....: 23266.0 kH/s (89.89ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....: 46008.7 kH/s

Hashtype: PDF 1.1 - 1.3 (Acrobat 2 - 4) + collider-mode #1

Speed.Dev.#2.....: 24669.3 kH/s (84.89ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....: 25201.8 kH/s (82.99ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....: 49871.1 kH/s

Hashtype: PDF 1.4 - 1.6 (Acrobat 5 - 8)

Speed.Dev.#2.....:  1111.7 kH/s (57.00ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:  1134.8 kH/s (55.71ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:  2246.4 kH/s

Hashtype: PDF 1.7 Level 3 (Acrobat 9)

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   207.7 MH/s (80.32ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   212.1 MH/s (78.57ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   419.8 MH/s

Hashtype: PDF 1.7 Level 8 (Acrobat 10 - 11)

Speed.Dev.#2.....:     2390 H/s (356.64ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:     2480 H/s (343.69ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:     4870 H/s

Hashtype: Password Safe v2

Speed.Dev.#2.....:    20188 H/s (24.34ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:    19148 H/s (25.96ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:    39336 H/s

Hashtype: Password Safe v3

Speed.Dev.#2.....:    81584 H/s (49.86ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:    83242 H/s (48.85ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   164.8 kH/s

Hashtype: Lastpass

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   157.5 kH/s (51.02ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   159.4 kH/s (50.38ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   316.9 kH/s

Hashtype: 1Password, agilekeychain

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   223.8 kH/s (71.42ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   229.8 kH/s (69.70ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   453.6 kH/s

Hashtype: 1Password, cloudkeychain

Speed.Dev.#2.....:      742 H/s (67.54ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:      777 H/s (66.16ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:     1519 H/s

Hashtype: Bitcoin/Litecoin wallet.dat

Speed.Dev.#2.....:      309 H/s (66.54ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:      311 H/s (65.21ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:      620 H/s

Hashtype: Blockchain, My Wallet

Speed.Dev.#2.....:  5500.4 kH/s (23.63ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:  5639.9 kH/s (23.20ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....: 11140.3 kH/s

Hashtype: Keepass 1 (AES/Twofish) and Keepass 2 (AES)

Speed.Dev.#2.....:     9148 H/s (152.05ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:     9353 H/s (148.80ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:    18500 H/s

Hashtype: ArubaOS

Speed.Dev.#2.....:   457.6 MH/s (73.23ms)
Speed.Dev.#3.....:   465.9 MH/s (71.77ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   923.5 MH/s

Started: Fri Mar 24 15:59:50 2017
Stopped: Fri Mar 24 16:15:15 2017

[bertone]

To je uvod u review ili ... ?

[Visage]

Jucer pitam u generalnoj temi za mini DP adaptere na DVI/VGA koje trebam NVS i Quadro, jer nisam mogao naci kutiju, pa malocas sam sebi odgovaram u istoj.

Te me iznenadi da ime Quadro proizvoda nestade iz oznacavanje Pro Nvidia kartica. Sve isto samo bezlicne oznake.

Detaljnije : Nvidia Quadro is Gone - No More Quadro - Quadro is Retired!

Znam, nije ispod cekica, ali nisam uopce znao do danas, te je bas bezveze potez.

NVIDIA confirmed to drop Quadro designation The main reason is that currently NVIDIA graphics are starting to be used in more and more segments. The number of graphics cards of the company for computing tasks have increased in quantity very noticeably.

Dobri komentari : More On NVIDIA Quadro Brand Retirement: Embracing the Graphics and Compute Overlap



...

[C128]

Tko kaže da nema više Quadro?
https://quadro.com.hr/web/en/brand/3-quadro
Ima svega od TV-a do Toaster-a.

Možda je NVidia izgubila pravo na navedeni brand, kao i Toblerone na Matherhorn.

[Sinac]

Autor Visage

/CUT
Dobri komentari : More On NVIDIA Quadro Brand Retirement: Embracing the Graphics and Compute Overlap

Dakle, među tim komentarima spomenuto je da su svojedobno na tržištu bile Nvidijine grafičke kartice kojima si mogao prelemiti jedan otpornik s pozicije 1-2 na poziciju 2-3 i imao si Quardo umjesto "klasične" grafičke kartice. Tako da s jedne strane ispada da su radili isti proizvod za dvije različite namjene koja je ovisila o jednom otporniku i softverskoj podršci kroz drajvere. Današnje "klasične" grafičke kartice su ionako dovoljno snažne za bilo kakvu CAD/CAM/3D upotrebu i zato i postoje Nvidia Studio drajveri. U potpunosti shvaćam Nvidijinu nevoljkost da održava Quadro na životu kad im je to nepotreban trošak, što s marketinške strane, što sa strane proizvodnje ako moraju jedan otpotnik lemiti da drugoj poziciji pa onda to još pakirati u drugačiju kutiju s natpisom Quadro. Da postoji neka veća hardverska razlika u cijeloj priči, onda bih to bilo na njihovu štetu.

[Nikky]

Zaboravljaš:
- naravno da je lakše za proizvodnju kada je razlika samo pozicija otpornika i eventualno drugi bios
- po defaultu su profi Quadro kartice x puta skuplje

[Sinac]

Jesu skuplje, ali koja korist kad im je pala prodaja. Ne gledaš samo trošak proizvodnje u cijeloj priči, gledaš konačnu zaradu.

EDIT= Da nadopunim: Što Nvidia radi s neprodanim Quadro karticama? Snizi cijenu ako je u pitanju starija generacija? Transportira natrag u tvornicu da ih preprave u klasične gamerske kartice i prepakiraju u drugu ambalažu? Koliki je gubitak novca u svemu tome?

[rendula]

Ni meni nije ni najmanje cudno da su ih maknuli. Jos jedan razlog je sto je lakse zamagljivati brojeve na investor callovima, bez da netko analizira podjele izmedju mininga, gaminga, AI-ja i slicnog.

[Problem]

Pa nije da su nestale. Sta nisu samo rebrandirane?

https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/design-...ktop-graphics/

[Visage]

Autor Sinac

U potpunosti shvaćam Nvidijinu nevoljkost da održava Quadro na životu kad im je to nepotreban trošak

Zivot je brz, paznja nam je razbacana na sto strana, a onda se desi i pored postavljenih citata, da ne procitamo sto pise

Nije Quadro umirovljena kao linija proizvoda, vec je samo naziv Quadro maknut kao (do sada) prepoznatljivi naziv. Identicne kartice su samo izgubile ima Quadro u oznacavanju. No, ako se pogleda u ponude po webu, pa cak i (pojedinih) nasih trgovcaca i dalje se koriste naziv Quadro kao kategorija. Navika je razumljiva. U drugi dio o pretvorbi necu, jer cemo otici u tri nove teme.

Velim, datumski me mimoisla promjena pa sam pozelio komentirat.

Nvidia Architecture Generation

...

[Sinac]

Autor Visage

/CUT

Zivot je brz, paznja nam je razbacana na sto strana, a onda se desi i pored postavljenih citata, da ne procitamo sto pise

Autor Sinac

Dakle, među tim komentarima spomenuto je da su svojedobno na tržištu bile Nvidijine grafičke kartice kojima si mogao prelemiti jedan otpornik s pozicije 1-2 na poziciju 2-3 i imao si Quardo umjesto "klasične" grafičke kartice. Tako da s jedne strane ispada da su radili isti proizvod za dvije različite namjene koja je ovisila o jednom otporniku i softverskoj podršci kroz drajvere. Današnje "klasične" grafičke kartice su ionako dovoljno snažne za bilo kakvu CAD/CAM/3D upotrebu i zato i postoje Nvidia Studio drajveri. U potpunosti shvaćam Nvidijinu nevoljkost da održava Quadro na životu kad im je to nepotreban trošak, što s marketinške strane, što sa strane proizvodnje ako moraju jedan otpotnik lemiti da drugoj poziciji pa onda to još pakirati u drugačiju kutiju s natpisom Quadro. Da postoji neka veća hardverska razlika u cijeloj priči, onda bih to bilo na njihovu štetu.

Kolega Visage, jesam li išta drugo napisao u svom postu? Nvidia je maknula Quadro kao brand jer više nije imao smisla, nije se Nvidia mogla natjecati sama sa sobom u tom CAD/CAM/3D dijelu kad je ionako RTX serija već i po prodaji zamijenila Quadro još dok je bio prisutan na tržištu pri pojavi prve RTX serije grafičkih kartica, ne samo poslovnih nego i gamerskih. U detaljnu razliku u hardveru između gamerskih i poslovnih kartica neću ulaziti jer svi ionako gledaju samo omjer cijena/performanse. Onome kome treba specijalizirana grafička kartica za jednu ili dvije poslovne aplikacije koje koristi platit će ih i pet puta više ako ima veće performanse, odnosno brže obavi posao i neće gledati ima li Quadro, gamersku RTX karticu ili poslovnu RTX karticu. Hoće li biti grafička s 12 Gb memorije ili 48 Gb memorije, znači li to ikome išta? Mislim da ne jer ionako u konačnici gledaš performanse. U istom cjenovnom rangu koji ti je dostupan uzet ćeš onu grafičku karticu koja ima bolje performanse za tvoje potrebe, zar ne?

[Visage]

Kolega Sinac,

ma na ide posebno tebi, ostali su se nadovezali, pa sam tebe prvog citirao.

Velim, vjerovao netko u Quadro selekciju, testiranje, drivere... ali te karte ostaju u identicnom procesu validacije i cijene, samo su makli ime. Takve odluke su (meni blesave) no vidjene cesto u industriji danas, ali dobro...

[mkey]

Meni nije jasno: koje je to prednosti donosio quadro za CAM pred klasičnim/ekvivalntnim grafičkim karticama?

[Sinac]

Autor Visage

Kolega Sinac,

ma na ide posebno tebi, ostali su se nadovezali, pa sam tebe prvog citirao.

Velim, vjerovao netko u Quadro selekciju, testiranje, drivere... ali te karte ostaju u identicnom procesu validacije i cijene, samo su makli ime. Takve odluke su (meni blesave) no vidjene cesto u industriji danas, ali dobro...

Aha, sorry, krivo sam shvatio da je to kritika meni.

Autor mkey

Meni nije jasno: koje je to prednosti donosio quadro za CAM pred klasičnim/ekvivalntnim grafičkim karticama?

Quadro kartice imaju optimizirane drajvere za CAD/CAM/3D pa čak i 2D aplikacije koji omogućuju višestruko brži rad u pojedinim dijelovima (ne svim) izvođenja programa nego klasične grafičke kartice. To se pogotovo odnosi na pomicanje slike (pan) i skrolanje, zumiranje, rotaciju itd. gdje je bitna brzina ponovnog iscrtavanja ekrana jer Quadro kartice znaju to izvesti višestruko brže nego njihov generacijski pandan među klasičnim grafičkim karticama. Obrati pažnju da nisam isticao razliku u hardveru, to je siva zona za koju ćeš naći različite informacije jer službene nisu dostupne i Nvidija ih skriva ko zmija noge.

[Problem]

Za autocad imas brdo pluginova koji iz pointclud-a rade as-built solid modele. Ja sam prije dobivao takve modele i high end gtx kartice (tipa 1080ti) kakvu sam ja koristio su se gusile u takvim .dwg-ovima, makar su imali svega par mb. S druge strane, ta ista kartica je bila sposobna vrtiti point cloud od stotina milijuna tocaka.

[Visage]

Autor Sinac

Aha, sorry, krivo sam shvatio da je to kritika meni..

Baci oko na tekst, pa onda kontroverzu komentara ispod, koju uvijek izaziva tema. Slicne rasprava je prije izazivala Radeon / FirePro tematika. Evo, bas gledam, nisam ni znao da se FirePro isto preimenovala, te je sad Radeon Pro.



...

[Sinac]

Autor Visage

Baci oko na tekst, pa onda kontroverzu komentara ispod, koju uvijek izaziva tema. Slicne rasprava je prije izazivala Radeon / FirePro tematika. Evo, bas gledam, nisam ni znao da se FirePro isto preimenovala, te je sad Radeon Pro.

...

Slažem se sa svim navedenim, uz opasku da to vrijedi samo za novije verzije Quadro/RTX grafičkih kartica jer se tu počela pojavljivati arhitektura koja već zalazi u područje koje nije čisti CAD/CAM/3D, ono s neuralnim mrežama već ulazi u područje AI-a. I znam da je tu Nvidija počela s Tesla karticama koje su opet bile posebno namijenjene čistim kalkulacijama, koja god da im je bila znanstvena svrha. S novom generacijom grafičkih procesora nema čistog razgraničenja područja primjene, zato su i ugasili Teslu i Quadro preimenovali u Nvidia Data Center GPUs i RTX. I neću se čuditi ako za godinu-dvije ostane samo jedan novi brand profesionalnih grafičkih kartica koji pokriva oba segmenta koje su pokrivale i Tesla i Quadro grafičke kartice.
I opet ponavljam, uz sve dijagrame mi ne znamo koja je zapravo realna razlika između klasične i profi kartice zasnovane na istom grafičkom procesoru.
Ako pogledamo napredak grafičkih kartica, sjetimo se da je prije RTX serije bio san imati gamersku grafičku karticu koja ray tracing izvodi on-fly u igrama.

[mkey]

Ako stvarno pričamo samo o razlici u optimizaciji drivera onda se to dosta dobro uklapa u moje iskustvo s ponašanjem nvidije te moje mišljenje o istom.

[MadBoY]

Jedina hardverska razlika je bila u tome što su Quadro kartice ponekad imale više VRAM-a, sve ostalo je isto GeForce modelima. Quadro su dolazile s "certificiranim" driverima za neke programe koji su to znali iskoristiti i zato su bile brže.

[d0X]

Autor MadBoY

Jedina hardverska razlika je bila u tome što su Quadro kartice ponekad imale više VRAM-a, sve ostalo je isto GeForce modelima. Quadro su dolazile s "certificiranim" driverima za neke programe koji su to znali iskoristiti i zato su bile brže.

Sjećam se da sam soft-modao staru Nvidia 6800 u Quadro 4000 i dobivao bolje performanse u OpenGL igrama.

[^SuperUnknown^]

ECC memorija na Quadricama je isto nezanemariva razlika

[rendula]

Aha, znaci samo se ime mijenja, ali i dalje ce biti drukcije i imenom i izvedbom od geforcea. Onda, ono, koga briga

[JuiceBox]

Pa da, sve ostaje isto, nije vise quadro nego je RTX Axxx , tipa RTX A6000

Full lineup: https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/design-...ktop-graphics/

[coconut]

Bilo bi zanimljivo kada bi netko napravio usporedbu gamerske grafe i RX pandana, kako u igrama tako i u profi programima pa da vidimo imaju li one uopće smisla i da li performanse opravdavaju znatno višu cijenu.

[Sinac]

Autor coconut

Bilo bi zanimljivo kada bi netko napravio usporedbu gamerske grafe i RX pandana, kako u igrama tako i u profi programima pa da vidimo imaju li one uopće smisla i da li performanse opravdavaju znatno višu cijenu.

https://www.cgdirector.com/pro-vs-consumer-gpus/

Za profi aplikacije - definitivno da. Za mješovitu upotrebu - definitivno ne.

[JuiceBox]

Autor Sinac

https://www.cgdirector.com/pro-vs-consumer-gpus/

Za profi aplikacije - definitivno da. Za mješovitu upotrebu - definitivno ne.

U ovom clanku je vidiljivo apsolutno nista osim HW usporebe i mogucih scenarija. Kolega je pitao direkta usporedba u primjeni, ne rekla kazala (osim multiple monitor setupa).

[Problem]

ima materijala na yt-u:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEagFvmjW4w

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDwNZXVGR3w

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtN9dX0oWzY

Zaključak: ovisno o aplikaciji koja se koristi, Za allroundere definitivno nije.