[kopija]

Autor geronimo_2

nema razlike ako koristis m.2 sata protokol il kak se vec naziva.
ak uzmes nvme odna imas puno vece brzine koje opet AFAIK obicnom gejmeru i useru nisu potrebne i nis ne znace.
ja bi osobno preporucio svima obicni SSD, ako nije do ustede SATA konektora i prostora u kucistu.
nek me znalci isprave ak sam u krivu.

Evo dobar komentar na temu SSD vs NVMe u radu s velikim fajlovima.

When I'm working with video files on my older laptop which only has 850 EVO SSD, I actually wish I had NVME for those files. For operations not cpu bound, like stitching video without transcoding, editing or converting containers, it can saturate full bandwidth ~540 MB/s+ and I simply take a break if I'm working with many files or very large files.

The problem comes with files a few GB. It's too short to actually take a break or switch to something else, yet long enough that I'm just waiting in front of the screen for like 8-10 secs. With nvme I can cut it down to 1-2s for each file or operation.