[Wolverine]

Autor Drug Brko

Fuck

Tako su nešto i ovi naveli.

First and foremost is the fact that voltages implementation is a bit different this time around with both the CPU and its associated SoC requiring voltage boosts to attain stability. Cooling is also a challenge since at 1.4V (the maximum I'd push through Ryzen) the processor puts out an epic amount of heat. And I mean a lot heat since even a Corsair H110i GTX I have on hand struggled to keep up with the burgeoning heat load.

So what does this all mean for overclocking? I'm not quite sure yet since I'm still dialing things in. Right now it looks like overclocking will settle somewhere between 3.85GHz and 4GHz.

Autor Manuel Calavera

Efikasnost je odlična. Naravno ne za one koji su mislili reklamirani TDP = potrošnja
Uspjeli su ostati par watta iza broadwell-e i sa porastom clocka (naravno ništa bitno, simbolično), ali nisu lagali na prezentaciji, a najjači forte im je idle potrošnja (skoro duplo manje od broadwell-e, čak i manje od skylake/kaby). Ja sam očekivao da će to prebacivati broadwell-e uz povećanje clockova i u nezavisnom testiranju

Ovdje je pak malo drugačije izmjereno

Autor silver_tip

Ajd ispravite me ako lose zakljucujem...

http://www.pcekspert.com/clanak/amd-...ecenzija/?pg=3

Handbrake test:

R7 1800X 8/16 @4.0GHz - 25.1 Fps
R5 1400X 4/8 @3.9GHz - 12 Fps-a ??

R5 1600X 6/12 @3.7GHz - 16/17 Fps-a ???

Ne bi baš rekao da je ono na 1800X dobiveno pri 4,0 GHz. Tj sumnjam da je Krešo lockao takt na 4,0 GHz za cijeli test. 1800X kad su sve jezgre opterećene radi na oko 3,6-3,7 GHz barem prema ovome.