Citiraj:
Autor SRV
Ima i 8800GT nesto a la UVD, kod nevidije se to samo drugacije zove. DX10.1 ti 100% nece nista znacit. Je li sad laksa odluka?  |
procitaj recenziju 3870 na
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/200...deon_hd_3870/1
ima posebna sekcija koja objasnjava UVD i dx10.1
stvarno dobro stivo
sto se tice UVDa i geforcea:
"H.264 is currently by far the most resource-intensive video codec, such that even a dual-core CPU can't cope with the high bit rates H.264 content often runs at (up to 40Mbps). However, what Nvidia didn’t do was include bitstream processing and entropy decode acceleration for movies using the VC-1 codec. In other words, practically every HD DVD movie available (aside from a select few) at the time of writing isn’t completely GPU accelerated on any of Nvidia's GPUs, regardless of whether the second generation video processor is present or not."
dx10.1
"In DirectX 10.0, there were 16 128-bit vector inputs and 128-bit vector outputs per shader; DirectX 10.1 doubles this to 32 both into and out of the vertex shader. This will go a long way to help improving performance in some of the more complex shader instructions that are likely to be used in future games."
ugl, ne pisem ovo zato sto sam ati fanboy (zaboli me za marku graficke, glavno da je dobar omjer cijene i snage)
ali stvarno te dvije stvari su me navele da kupim HD3870 umjesto 8800GT
je, gt8800 je jaci u igrama, ali za koliko? tih 5-10 frejmova mi nista ne znaci kad uzmes u obzir da je 3870 jeftiniji za 500kn i dolazi sa vise featura