[morph]

Autor SniperWolf

Hm, da..
sad mi je malo jasnije, al sto nije overkill ako je cd 320kbps 'recimo' jer nisam dobio odgovor, da se codira u FLACu koji je 1000kbps?

Audio CD (govorim o originalnom Audio Cd-u ili o onom snimljenom iz lossless formata, ne o Audio Cd-u snimljenom iz mp3 - u tom slucaju flac nema smisla) sigurno nije 320 kbps, tako da nema overkilla. I FLAC-om se (kao sto je vec receno) muzika ne komprimira na određenu kvalitetu (odredivu bitrateom) nego se zadrzava postojeca kvaliteta.

Sa http://flac.sourceforge.net/faq.html

What is the lowest bitrate (or highest compression) achievable with FLAC?

With FLAC you do not specify a bitrate like with some lossy codecs.It's more like specifying a quality with Vorbis or MPC, except with FLAC the quality is always "lossless" and the resulting bitrate is roughly proportional to the amount of information in the original signal...

Sa http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FLAC#Comparisons

FLAC is for efficient packing of audio data, unlike general lossless algorithms such as ZIP and gzip. While ZIP may compress a CD-quality audio file by 10–20%, FLAC achieves compression rates of 30–50% for most music, with significantly greater compression for voice recordings.