View Single Post
Staro 09.08.2006., 01:45   #11
jonyb
Registered User
Moj komp
 
jonyb's Avatar
 
Datum registracije: Apr 2004
Lokacija: zg
Postovi: 887
Citiraj:
Autor BrunoZG
je gorki bit će da je to

jonyb.. Samo za tebe copy paste sa review-a cdrinfa u vezi čitanja.malo sam ti podebljao bitno.

"As already mentioned, the drive has a great error correction mechanism, reading over all inserted artfificially defective media, at max speed. CD error correction could've been better, as the 4571 reported average results in comparison to other market drives. Especially the 726 test media reported totaly difference results from what one would expect of a latest release drive.

Burning quality was a major issue for the review drive as while it did quite well with write once media and reported average results with the Re-Writable media, it did not achieve good results with the DL media. Overall the drive's writing performance is much dependent from the media inserted, indicating a somewhat limited media list. A firmware upgrade regarding the DL media issues would be most welcomed.

What of the "features" that most drives offer, one would wonder... In this field, the 4571A is not strong enough. The 90/99mins Audio discs cannot be read by the drive and cannot perform overburn with either CD or DVD media. Bitsetting feature is present though for all three +R media formats. An extra feature for the users who enjoy media customization is the LabelFlash feature which enables the user to label his burned media using the drive itself than some printable labels.
bez brige pročital sam ja več to.... tak isto piše za moj 3540A da odlično čita medije, a u praksi je stvar drugačija kad ga npr. povučeš paralelu sa pioneerom.

nažalost još nisam imal prilike isprobati 4571A, pa da ga usporedim sa pionirčekom 111D... tak da nisam kompetentan suditi o ovom modelu. ali sumnjam da ima nekog velikog odmaka u odnosu na prijašnje modele.
jonyb je offline   Reply With Quote