View Single Post
Staro 09.08.2006., 01:05   #10
BrunoZG
Junior Member
 
BrunoZG's Avatar
 
Datum registracije: May 2003
Lokacija: Zagreb
Postovi: 3,205
Citiraj:
Autor G0RKI
Dizanju Windowsa! LOL

BTW nista od navedenog ne bi zemija!
je gorki bit će da je to

jonyb.. Samo za tebe copy paste sa review-a cdrinfa u vezi čitanja.malo sam ti podebljao bitno.

"As already mentioned, the drive has a great error correction mechanism, reading over all inserted artfificially defective media, at max speed. CD error correction could've been better, as the 4571 reported average results in comparison to other market drives. Especially the 726 test media reported totaly difference results from what one would expect of a latest release drive.

Burning quality was a major issue for the review drive as while it did quite well with write once media and reported average results with the Re-Writable media, it did not achieve good results with the DL media. Overall the drive's writing performance is much dependent from the media inserted, indicating a somewhat limited media list. A firmware upgrade regarding the DL media issues would be most welcomed.

What of the "features" that most drives offer, one would wonder... In this field, the 4571A is not strong enough. The 90/99mins Audio discs cannot be read by the drive and cannot perform overburn with either CD or DVD media. Bitsetting feature is present though for all three +R media formats. An extra feature for the users who enjoy media customization is the LabelFlash feature which enables the user to label his burned media using the drive itself than some printable labels.
__________________




AMD 3800+x2@2500, 1,375V
MB-ASROCK DUAL SATA(bios 2.2) 2+ENERMAX485W
2x512 Supertalent CL2
HDD-Hitachi 160GB, WD 800JB
ELSA 7600GT
Leadtek-2000XP expert
DVDROM-LITEON-167T ,DVDRW BENQ 1650,DVDRW NEC ND2500A@2510_fw205C
Monitor: Samsung 997MB (19')
Terratec Sky 5.1,EPSON-C42









Zadnje izmijenjeno od: BrunoZG. 09.08.2006. u 01:28.
BrunoZG je offline   Reply With Quote