PC Ekspert Forum - View Single Post - Vijesti i novosti o Intel procesorima i čipsetima

The Exiled · 07.12.2024., 21:29

I to kaj veliš, mada IMHO sigurno mu ništa pretjerano nije falilo u AMD-u, ali ti PR i marketing likovi su isti u svakoj firmi, idu dalje za neku glupu sitnicu, a onda u toj istoj firmi koja je u ovom slučaju direktna konkurencija priča ušprancirane hvalospjeve bez gubitka daha, prodavači magle bez imalo srama i lako im je od firme do firme bez brige i pameti. Evo i bivšeg direktora u novom naletu pameti, jer sada više tzv. yield (omjer ispravnih i neispravnih čipova) nije pokazatelj napretka i uspješnosti fabrike općenito, mada je točno to u pitanju, ali eto - direktor Pat je uspjel i taj dio zajebati, pa nije to više bitno. Isto kak nekad nisu bili bitni proizvodni procesi, pa je išlo preimenovanje, jer su kasnili sa svime i odmah proizvodni proces postaje nebitan.

Citiraj:

Ousted Intel CEO steps in to defend the firm’s 18A process, says yield rate % isn’t the right metric to measure semiconductor progress

Citiraj:

Intel's "now ousted" CEO Pat Gelsinger has arrived on the scene, defending Intel Foundry's 18A "yield rate" claims by saying that the team is "doing incredible work." Recently, Intel's 18A process, which was supposed to be a breakthrough for the division, was said to feature yield rates of less than 10%, with the media calling this "abysmal." However, Gelsinger has stepped up to defend 18A, claiming that yield rate rumors are false. Gelsinger replied to a post by a prominent analyst, Patrick Moorhead, where it was initially claimed that Intel's 18A wasn't tested on a PDK 1.0 but rather an older design kit, which is why the yield rate figures are reported so low.

Interestingly, former and "ousted" Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger decided to jump into the conversation by verifying Moorhead's claims, saying that he is proud of the "18A team" and their incredible progress, hinting that the on-ground reality is different from what is being said in the mainstream media. In another reply to the prominent analyst Dan Nystedt, Gelsinger claims that factoring a process based on yield rate isn't right since a "large die will have a lower yield, smaller die - high yield percentage." Gelsinger was a huge advocate for Intel Foundry, claiming to make the division the "world's largest" by 2030, only to find himself forced out of the company the previous week.

Izvor: Pat Gelsinger

Huh, ovaj više ni sam ne vjeruje u to kaj i dalje totalno nepotrebno izjavljuje, jer je skoro četiri godine pričal ista sranja, pa se desilo to kaj se desilo.

Njemu je valjda najbolje mjerilo napretka firme i garantirani pokazatelj uspješnosti, količina potrošenog nofca na otkup vlastitih dionica, jer bome u tome itekak prednjače.