[tomek@vz]

Stemming from reports of several fake crypto apps appearing in Canonical's Snap Store that aimed to steal user funds, temporary restrictions have been put in place while Canonical investigates the security matter.

This isn't the first time the Snap store had something malicious in it (it already had malware a few years ago). While on Flathub, published apps are reviewed by the Flathub community, on Snap Store they're reviewed solely by Canonical. Since Flathub never had such incidents but Snap store did, what's the conclusion of all of this? That Canonical is incompetent / untrustworthy in reviewing apps and that only reinforces the argument of "Snap haters", that the proprietary backend of Snaps is a big flaw.

Kao što govorim od početka - Snap koncept je banana a Canonical se dnevno udaljuje od OSS koncepta. I ovo je rezultat.