PC Ekspert Forum - View Single Post - Intel "Alder/Raptor Lake" LGA-1700 Info Thread

The Exiled · 17.01.2023., 20:36

Zasebne testove možeš naći na npr. ovom kanalu, koji lijepo pokriva isključivo takve situacije, dok Hardware Unboxed i sl. pokriva(ju) većinu, pa se zato kod njih 13900KS uspoređuje s ostatkom ponude.

EDIT:
CPU & GPU Scaling Benchmark, Core i3-13100 vs. Ryzen 5 5600: Sub $150 Battle

Citiraj:

Intel Core i5-13400F CPU review: mainstream magic

Citiraj:

Having the fastest processor around is great for polishing a company’s halo and using the trickle-down effect to catalyse sales. Yet the bread and butter revenue is generated in the mainstream segment where more amenable pricing lays foundation for many more upgrades and new builds. Intel is acutely aware of this fact, reinforced by the ongoing cost-of-living crisis, so chips like the Core i5-13400F come at an opportune time. Priced at around $200, or £200, and offering inexpensive chipset and memory support, the non-IGP processor makes a strong case as the bedrock of a quality PC build that doesn’t cost the earth. Albeit based on the older Alder Lake architecture, yet offering more performance than a recent range-topping champion, Core i9-11900K, Intel has come a long way in a short space of time.

Izvor: Club386

Citiraj:

Core i9 13900K DDR5 7200 MHz (+memory scaling) review

Citiraj:

Our initial comparison of DDR4 and DDR5 memory with Alder Lake revealed that a high-performing DDR4 kit running at 3600 MHz can effectively compete with DDR5 4800/5200 CL40. The same holds true for Raptor Lake Gen 13 Core Intel CPUs. Both combinations are considered the "sweet spot" in terms of price and performance. While it's true that higher frequency DDR5 memory may offer slightly better performance, the difference is minimal and not really worth the additional cost. The sweet spot for frequency and latency is at 3600 MHz with DDR4 and 4800 MHz with DDR5, as this offers the best balance of cost and performance. Overall, if you're looking for the best value for your money, a DDR4 kit running at 3600 MHz is the way to go. But ... when going DDR5 there is a more perceptible difference between 4800 MHz and 7200 MHz, roughly 3~4% in best-case scenarios, but the price difference will be significant. This also brought up the question of how important DDR5 memory is over DDR4 and memory frequency over latency; this is why we included DDR4 results. For gaming, the hit is bigger but still acceptable as long as you stick to, say, 3600 MHz with okay timings and latency.

Izvor: Guru3D