Pa i sam je u izjavi nakon utrke Ham to potvrdio... nije zelio dopustit da ga Max pusti taman prije DRS detekcije, jos k tome bi Ham imao losiji ulazak u zadnji zavoj jer dolazi iznutra i onda ga Max uzme s DRS-om na startno-ciljnoj ravnini.
Zbog toga su igrali igrice tko ce i kada preteci/biti iza za vrijeme DRS detekcije, ali je Ham napravio amatersku pogresku, zabio se u Maxa i onda se na radio pravio grbav da nije znao sta ovaj radio ispred njega i da se zato zakucao u njega
Izgleda da sam djelomicno fulao jer su Maxu zakeljili jos dodatnih 10sec kazne i da se Ham zabio u njega primarno zbog njegovog naglog kocenja, iako ga je mogao obici nekoliko puta do tada, ali nije htio zbog DRS-detection zone.
Objasnjenje sudaca:
Citiraj:
At turn 21 the driver of car 33 [Verstappen] was given the instruction to give back a position to car 44 [Hamilton] and was told by the team to do so “strategically”. Car 33 slowed significantly at turn 26. However, it was obvious that neither driver wanted to take the lead prior to DRS detection line three.
The driver of car 33 stated that he was wondering why car 44 had not overtaken and the driver of car 44 stated that, not having been aware at that stage that car 33 was giving the position back, was unaware of the reason car 33 was slowing. In deciding to penalise the driver of car 33, the key point for the Stewards was that the driver of car 33 then braked suddenly (69 bar) and significantly, resulting in 2.4g deceleration.
Whilst accepting that the driver of car 44 could have overtaken car 33 when that car first slowed, we understand why he (and the driver of car 33) did not wish to be the first to cross the DRS.
However, the sudden braking by the driver of car 33 was determined by the Stewards to be erratic and hence the predominant cause of the collision and hence the standard penalty of 10 seconds for this type of incident, is imposed.
|