[Old.machine]

Autor Mario92

Kupio ih kad su bile na akciji, danas stigle.

Super sluške, taman nekaj kaj sam tražil. Fala lepa Stara mašino!

Autor Zeryx

Jel se isplati uzeti taj? negdje citam da je to neka drugacija serija, da nije to to. bla bla bla.
pa sam ostao zbunjen i nisam ga jucer kupio.

To misliš na Samsung Evo Plus 1TB ili na SanDisk extreme?

Ako je Samsung u pitanju, mijenjali su neke stvari ali rezultat nije loš kao nedavni slučajevi kod Cruciala ili WD blacka.

Opširnije:

https://www.reddit.com/r/hardware/co...omponents_for/

It seems that the new version of the SSD is faster in workloads up to 115 GB - the size of its revised SLC cache, meant to absorb burst of write activity at faster speeds than the remainder NAND working in TLC mode. The original SLC cache provision stood at 42 GB, which is what the original version shipped with, and whose behavior is confirmed in testing - the original release of the Samsung 970 Evo Plus exhausts its SLC cache (with the appropriate performance drop from overflowing into TLC) at around 40 GB. This performance change is a welcome one, even if it too should be updated on the drives' official specifications. The drive does however deliver lower performance once its SLC cache is exhausted - the original version kept chugging along with data writing speeds of around 1,500 MB/s after the first 40 GB were written, while the new revision drops that performance to 800 MB/s after 115 GB of writes. So users can be faced with either improved performance, or worsened performance, in this same product compared to the original. Check the results in the gallery below, where the original revision is on the left side (BIOS 2B2QEXM7), and the new revision is on the right (3B2QEXM7).

https://www.reddit.com/r/pcmasterrac...evisions_does/

Unless you are often copying files or folders larger than 115GB, the hardware revisions Samsung made are likely better for you from a day-to-day performance perspective, assuming of course that you can keep the revised drive cool enough.

Najprimjetniji će biti skok u temperaturi ali nisam iz video na linku uspio zaključiti pri kojim uvjetima/testovima (možda pri tom velikom 115GB prebacivanju podataka?).