[23-D]

Autor leonardo

Ovdje imaš nešto detaljniju usporedbu. Ove godine se LG malo zaigrao sa brojkama tako da su sve serije dobile mali skok u oznakama. Taj SK8100 nije lošiji televizor od SM8200.

I ovdje je 8100 malo u prednosti

Nažalost, svuda je rasprodan, nisam niti primijetio kada sam gledao :/

BTW, da li je LG Nanocell u živo stvarno bolji od klasičnih LED TVa osim na papiru? Baš mi jedan član quoteao conclusion jednog reviewa za SM9000

Conclusion

In terms of picture quality, SM90 disappoints. The way it processes video in 8-bit SDR - all non-HDR video - is subpar and especially low-bitrate content from streaming services or channels suffer as a result, with green tint and heavy posterization in shadow details. These issues are not present with HDR content but the TV's limitations in zone dimming (48 zones only), contrast, and black levels, affect HDR picture quality, leading to visible halos (blooming) and limited dynamic range. These limitations also affect SDR picture quality but are more prominent in HDR.

The main advantage of the IPS panel type that LG is using in its LCD TVs is viewing angles but this year Samsung has, through sub-pixel rendering, managed to significantly widen viewing angles on the VA LCD panel type, catering to buyers who seek an alternative to OLED and worries of burn-in. This leaves LG with LCD TVs that are far from matching other top LCD TVs and its own OLED TVs. SM90 delivers mediocre HDR and SDR (channels, DVD, Blu-ray) picture quality and without any obvious advantages over the latest generation of VA LCD panels, LG's LCD TVs are being squeezed. Right now - and luckily for LG perhaps - only Samsung can offer this LCD alternative but unless LG dedicates more development ressources to its LCD TVs, it is hard to see them having a bright future. SM90 is not a TV that we can recommend.