PC Ekspert Forum - View Single Post - Vijesti i novosti o Intel procesorima i čipsetima

The Exiled · 06.09.2019., 21:11

Citiraj:

Real World Performance@IFA …without compromise

Citiraj:

Today at IFA we held an event for attending members of the media and analyst community on a topic that’s very near and dear to our heart — Real World Performance. We’ve been holding these events for a few months now beginning at Computex and then at E3, and we’ve learned a lot along the way. Desktop has and will continue to be a core focus for Intel, and we’re excited to release the 9900KS next month and share some updated perspective on performance-per-dollar for our X-series. We are proud of the technologies and products we build, and despite some competitor solutions that the community is questioning, the Core i9–9900K and Core i9–9900KS are TRUE 5.0 GHz processors. Intel has dramatic changes coming next month for the X-series and HEDT (high-end desktop market) line as well. The new family of products code-named Cascade Lake-X will offer up to 2x the performance per dollar of the previous generation. Though it is too early to talk about the specifics of how we are accomplishing this, you will see soon enough our commitment to the X-series and W-series families across Intel. Today marks yet another step in Intel’s journey to showcase the benefits and need for the industry to think about Real World Performance when evaluating hardware and platforms across a spectrum of options.

Citiraj:

Demo Productivity: Microsoft Office 365 saving PowerPoint file to PDF. Based on performance comparing Dell XPS 13 Configuration: Processor Intel® Core™ i3-1005G1, 2C/4T

Adobe 4K playback: Adobe Premiere Pro, v13.1, Video 4K HDR 10-bit playback. Based on performance comparing Dell XPS 13 2-in-1 Configuration: Processor: Intel® Core™ i7-1065G7, 4C/8T

Adobe Premiere Pro: v13.1, Export of 4K UHD HEVC (H.265) video. Based on performance comparing ASUS ZenBook Configuration: Processor: Intel® Core™ i5-10210U, 4C/8T

Halo The Master Chief Collection-beta: Halo The Master Chief Collection -beta, "Reach" gameplay. Based on performance comparing Razer Blade Stealth 13 Configuration: Processor: Intel® Core™ i7-1065G7, 4C/8T

Topaz Labs Gigapixel AI: Gigapixel AI v4.4.0; Image upscaling app using AI software; Lenovo Yoga S940, Processor: Intel® Core™ i7-1065G7, 4C/8T

Citiraj:

I continue to believe that using Cinebench or any other rendering application to measure performance on platforms where ray-traced rendering applications are not typically run is a disservice to the reader and consumer. I consider this especially true when the weighting and value of those results is exaggerated. Going forward I think it is fair to stop using the phrase “real world” on the slides when having this discussion about Cinebench. The ray tracing workload that it measures is indeed used in a real application and is not a synthetic test. My intent is not to discredit the Cinebench benchmark, but rather to encourage accurate usage of it for evaluation of processors. Finally, I wanted to apologize to Roman Hartung (Der8auer) as well as the authors quoted from Guru3D and PC Perspective for not personally giving them a heads up on our plan to use their data in our presentation.

Izvor: Ryan Shrout Chief Performance Strategist@Intel + 2019-IFA-Intel-RWPE.pdf

Citiraj:

Intel contradicts itself over claiming Cinema 4D is not an important workload

Citiraj:

At the 9900K launch last fall, the message was all about gaming. It’s hard to forget the Principled Technologies debacle that happened around that time, but if you do forget, here’s a reminder. It’s odd, then, that gaming was the focus at that time, but today, it seems to be about Microsoft Excel, and other mundane tests run through BAPCo SYSmark (which the company seemingly laid low on at this event). Intel reached out to offer its thoughts and corrections. The company says that it has nothing against Maxon’s Cinema 4D or its standalone Cinebench benchmark. It does believe, though, that too many people are relying on it for an overall view of processor performance. At Intel’s IFA briefing, Intel’s focus on C4D/CB performance revolved entirely around notebooks, not desktops. Our overall take hasn’t changed. After AMD released higher core-count CPUs, Intel began to reduce the importance of Cinebench, despite having touted its own scores many times before. That to us feels like too much of a coincidence. We think Intel should focus on its own strengths instead of downplaying the importance of a real-world, realistic benchmark

Izvor: Techgage