[T}{OR]

Autor warlock25

Ajmo vi koji imate 144/240 Hz monitor da li se stvarno osjeti razlika u gamingu ili je to vise placebo efekt?
Koja je razlika da netko kaze iz prve ruke jer po youtubeu nemres vidit nista

Na 60Hz sam vidio razliku kod gledanja YT recimo (60fps snimke). Ne znam u čem je fora ali sve izgleda nekako fluidnije u odnosu naspram 60Hz monitora.

Što se tiče igara, razlika se osjeti negdje oko 80-90 na gore FPS/Hz. Tada igra postane nevjerojatno glatka i dobiješ onaj efekt kao da ne gledaš ekran već "kroz prozor". Ne bih se vraćao natrag nikada nakon što sam ovo iskusio.

Druga stvar, a to sam pročitao negdje na nekoj od recenzija: 144Hz i jako niski odaziv (input lag < 10ms) isto ima razlike kod MP pucačina. Tamo je u jednoj recenziji lik napisao da u kombinaciji sa G-syncom si defakto u prednosti nad drugima. Veli da pogađaš stvari koje inače ne bi sa 60Hz monitorom niskog odaziva. Ja malo što sam testirao (a ne igram godinama MP FPS pa suckam stravično) našao sam se da uletavam u duele 1 na 1 gdje kasno palim i ipak uspijem sredit lika i preživjet duel. To se prije nije događalo.

Tako da - 144Hz i FreeSync ili G-Sync kombo the way.


EDIT: Recenzija XB271HU kojeg imam.

Gaming Performance
The overall gaming experience of the Acer Predator XB271HU is sublime. This is mainly due to the fact that it is a high refresh rate panel supported by NVIDIA's G-Sync technology, which essentially adapts the screen's refresh rate to the current framerate to ensure a perfectly smooth, tear-free picture. The effective G-Sync range is 35-165 Hz (or 35-165 FPS, if you want to look at it that way), which means you'll be able to fully utilize it even if you decide to overclock the panel.

The smoothness of the gameplay and my mouse's accuracy when gaming at a high framerate are simply staggering. By getting this monitor, especially if you were previously using a standard 60 Hz model, you will effectively improve your in-game skills. Within a matter of hours, I started hitting headshots I previously wouldn't even dare to try. I also felt like I replaced my mouse with an infinitely better one even though that is not really possible as my mouse is equipped with one of the best optical sensors currently available, the PixArt PMW3366.

Input Lag
I tested input lag by connecting the Predator XB271HU and my trusty CRT monitor to the same graphics card, putting them in clone mode, and running a precise timer, with V-Sync turned off. I then took photos of both screens at very high shutter speeds to capture the difference in the times displayed on the timer. While this certainly isn't the ideal method of determining the exact input lag value, it does give us an idea of the category the monitor falls into.

The general consensus is that, in terms of input lag, there are three categories monitors can fall into. If it's lower than 16 ms (that equals a frame of lag at 60 Hz), the monitor can be declared as gaming-grade for even the most demanding gamers. If it falls between 16-32 ms (between 1-2 frames of lag at 60 Hz), the monitor is suitable for almost everyone but the most hardcore gamers, especially if they're playing first-person shooters. Finally, if a monitor's input lag is higher than 32 ms (over 2 frames of lag at 60 Hz), even casual gamers should be able to notice it. Will they be bothered by it? Not necessarily, but I can't recommend a screen like that for serious gaming.

The Acer Predator XB271HU confidently falls into the first category. Its measured input lag was sitting well below 10 ms with Overdrive set to Normal. It did increase a bit when Overdrive was set to Extreme, but that's to be expected since the electronics have a more complex task to complete. That's eSports-grade performance right there and yet another confirmation of the fact that the Predator XB271HU is a great choice for the audience it primarily aims for.