27.06.2018., 08:39
|
#4597
|
McG
Datum registracije: Feb 2014
Lokacija: Varaždin
Postovi: 8,196
|
AMD tackles coming "Chiplet" revolution with new chip network scheme
Citiraj:
With Moore's Law being pronounced as within its death throes, historic monolithic die designs are becoming increasingly expensive to manufacture. It's no secret that both AMD and nVidia have been exploring an MCM (Multi-Chip-Module) approach towards diverting from monolithic die designs over to a much more manageable, "chiplet" design. This "chiplet" approach is easy to understand - smaller, leaner chips can be produced with higher yields than large, monolithic ones, which are more prone to silicon defects. This increased yield allows AMD to reduce manufacturing costs and increase production efficiency by using a single mask for a quad-core module, for instance. However, as the number of modules in a given chip increase, so does complexity of signal processing and routing - two modules communicating with each other is relatively easy to achieve, but six or eight modules? The challenge becomes increasingly greater when joining different types of chips - from memory to processing dies and I/O controllers - in a single silicon slice. This is where interposers appear - and where AMD is taking strides towards achieving an active interposer design. For now, AMD says these active interposers ought to be reserved for high-performance designs - not surprising, given the added R&D cost over passive interposer or sans-interposer design. The dream to mix and match and reuse different IPs at will via a "simple" substrate, however, is very much alive.
AMD researchers proved that for 32-core processors - with possibilities of scaling with estimated monolithic die complexity versus the chiplet approach - could be achieved with much better yield and lower manufacturing cost in the chiplet + passive/active interposer design versus a monolithic 16nm die.
|
Izvor: TechPowerUp, Guru3D, IEEE Spectrum + PDF ( 1 - 2)
Zadnje izmijenjeno od: The Exiled. 15.07.2018. u 15:16.
|
|
|