Citiraj:
Autor Dottore
Ok, ima domet 350km na papiru. Mene interesira koliki stvarni domet u realnosti sa punjenjem mobitela, klima/grijanje? Prokuhati/smrzavati do željnih 350km je mit.
Prednji dio je ogavan i dovoljno stvori oštečenja od puta kamenčića i soli.
Sent from my Nexus 6P
|
Bjřrn Nyland, along with two other EV enthusiasts, performed a energy consumption test for Tesla Model S P85D, 70D and BMW i3 in winter conditions at around 0°C (32°F).
It wasn’t too terribly scientific (and the test will be repeated in the future) as both Model S were loaded with stuff, while the i3 was empty. Moreover, the BMW i3 was charging and heating the battery for about one half-hour along the route, while the Teslas’ batteries cooled a little bit in the parking lot.
Average speed after over 100 km (60 miles) was around 64 km/h (40 mph), which was good for the less aerodynamic i3.
Without surprise, the BMW i3 returned the lowest energy consumption at just 161 Wh/km! The Teslas were at around 200 Wh/km, but we believe that in a more optimal test, the Teslas could be below 180 Wh/km. But still, the BMW’s low weight makes the i3 unbeatable in tests such as this.
________________________
Eto, tesla 3 je manji i laksi auto od tesle s, pa racunaj da ce potrositi manje watta po kilometru zimi sa 64 km/h prosjekom brzine i natovaren teretom.
Evo još neki navodi s weba na autoputu u Njemačkoj za brzine od 160-200 km/h, liku je ispalo 410-430 watta po kilometru.
Toplo vrijeme, dobri uvjeti na cesti.
Ali koliki postotak ljudi vozi do 200 km/h...
http://www.teslamotors.wiki/wiki/Q:_..._at_100_mph%3F
Meni to sve za sada dobro izgleda za one koji bi auto koristili po gradu, otvorenoj cesti, a za autoput do 120 km/h evo jedan osvrt:
https://steemit.com/tesla/@coreyou/t...ange-in-summer
U grafu se vidi potrošnja za ostale brzine.
Uglavnom, dobri uvjeti na cesti, ljeto i cruise control na 120 km/h i tesla s potroši 200 watta po kilometru.
Čisto dobro za početak.