Citiraj:
Autor emilblomsky
Vidim po ovome da se fx još jako dobro drži u igrama.Pogotovo kad znam koliko sam ga platio.
Slabiji ryzeni bi trebali biti tu negdje.
|
Shhhh,nemoj to govorit. Opcepoznato je da Ryzen nije dobar za geyming jer ga 7700k potuce na 480p rezi.
Inace,ajmo vidit kakve je probleme imao svemocni Intel na launchu svojih CPU:
Intel P67 (Sandy Bridge) - SATA
Z77 (Ivy Bridge) - nothing major apart from no solder on TIM which is a given because of node shrink but this was still SB on lower node.
Z87 (Haswell) - Errata with TSX implementation.
Z170 (Skylake) - The Bug cased in Mersenne Prime computations when using P95 casuing freezing.
Others: Pentium FDIV Bugs in Pentium Processors circa 1995.
The good news is that almost all existing X79 motherboards will see BIOS/EFI updates enabling Ivy Bridge E support. The keyword there is almost.
When it exited the desktop motherboard market, Intel only promised to release new Haswell motherboards and to support them through the end of their warranty period. Intel never promised to release updated X79 motherboards for Ivy Bridge E, nor did it promise to update its existing X79 boards to support the new chips. In a very disappointing move, Intel confirmed to me that none of its own X79 boards will support Ivy Bridge E. I confirmed this myself by trying to boot a Core i7-4960X on my Intel DX79SI
- the system wouldn’t POST. While most existing X79 motherboards will receive BIOS updates enabling IVB-E support, anyone who bought an Intel branded X79 motherboard is out of luck. Given that LGA-2011 owners are by definition some of the most profitable/influential/dedicated customers Intel has, I don’t think I need to point out how damaging this is to customer relations. If it’s any consolation, IVB-E doesn’t actually offer much of a performance boost over SNB-E - so if you’re stuck with an Intel X79 motherboard without IVB-E support, you’re not missing out on too much.
ASUS New X79 Deluxe
The board worked relatively well but it seems like there’s still some work that needs to be done on the BIOS side. When loaded with 32GB of RAM I saw infrequent instability at stock voltages.
It’s my understanding that Intel didn’t provide final BIOS code to the motherboard makers until a couple of weeks ago, so don’t be too surprised if there are some early teething
pains.
Add to that, the first chips released 22 months before, the Sandy Bridge-E i7-3960X and i7-3930K had a VT-d related bug, and thus that feature was disabled in the first revision that was sold.
Ali nee,to je samo Intel imao los dan dok je Ryzen total disaster i sramota.
Kako ljudi brzo zaboravljaju dok se bave nadriekonomijom i cudesnim usporedbama jedne od vodecih tehnoloskih kompanija sa prodavacima keksa i kobasica.
