Čudni rezultati od onog što sam dosad vidio s 4-5 stranica... u sintetici sjajno pa u takvom real-world testu slabije i onda obrnuto
Potrošnja isto skroz drukčija(viša) kod par reviewera.
Uglavnom, ima nekoliko mušica što se tiče konstantosti kroz sve scenarije, ali, early days... i zato je i takva cijena. 6-core i 4-core
@Techspot
Citiraj:
One thing I did notice is that all the games I have looked at so far -- which is considerably more than the four shown here -- were smooth on the Ryzen processors. GTA 5 for example plays really well on the Core i7-7700K, but every now and then a small stutter can be noticed, while the 1800X runs as smooth as silk, sans stuttering from what I observed.
I found a similar situation when testing Battlefield 1. Performance was smooth with the Ryzen processors while every now and then the quad-core 7700K had a small hiccup. These were rare but it was something I didn't notice when using the 1800X and 1700X. But as smooth as the experience was, it doesn't change the fact that gamers running a high refresh rate monitor may be better served by a higher clocked Core i7-6700K or 7700K.
While the gaming results might not be as strong as we had hoped for, they are highly competitive and that should hold particularly true for the Ryzen 5 and 3 series. It's also worth noting that we are testing extreme gaming performance here with the Titan XP at 1080p.
|