View Single Post
Staro 21.10.2015., 11:40   #673
Manuel Calavera
Premium
Moj komp
 
Manuel Calavera's Avatar
 
Datum registracije: Jul 2012
Lokacija: vk+
Postovi: 14,578
Citiraj:
DICE wasn’t lying when they said that optimization for the FX 6300 and FX 4300 will be finished by launch. The FX 6300 an FX 4300 perform excellently, from a 50%-500% performance increase compared to the Beta. Optimization for the FX 6300 was so good that it even out performs the FX 8350. One more surprise came from the i3 which performs as well as AMD CPU’s which have much more cores.
Citiraj:
But we also notice that the i7 4770k still under performs compared to the i5 4670k. The i3 4340 even performs similarly to the i7 which should not be the case by any means
Citiraj:
When you look at benchmarks from BETA you will see that the difference is so big that is ridiculous. Better optimization paired with better drivers gives at least 50% more performance. With AMD’s FX CPU the gains are even much bigger , but if you switch to Win 8.1 you get an even higher 20% performance increase
Citiraj:
The i7 and FX 8350 continue to under perform where the i7 trails in W7 but manages to catch up with the i5 4670k under Windows 8.1. The FX 6300 still has the same performance as the FX 8350 and sometimes even better. The i3 plays out phenomenally.
Citiraj:
The i7 continues to trail behind the i5 and i3 even on W7 but manages to catch up again on Windows 8.1. This is an optimization issue since you can see that FX 8350 also trails behind the FX 6300 and only manages to be on par with it on Windows 8.1
Citiraj:
As we continue we see again that the i3 and i5 beat the i7 as well as the FX 6300 beating the FX 8350. We concluded that this is an optimization issue
Citiraj:
To state the obvious, the i7 and FX 8350 are again trailing on Windows 7 and only manage to catch up on Windows 8 with the slower CPU’s.
Citiraj:
And yet again the i7 and FX 8350 don’t do as good as they should, managing to give somewhat expected performance with Windows 8.1.
Citiraj:
The i3 again performs excellently and this CPU is one of the biggest surprises of this benchmark where at most times performed as well as the i7 or maybe even better. The FX 8350 again is under performing compared to the FX 6300.

Citiraj:
Game optimization- as we saw at this point in time it doesn’t really matter which CPU you have. The game is optimized to fully utilize only CPU’s with 4 cores or threads

Citiraj:
We believe that DICE is having trouble taming the beast called Frostbit Engine 3.0 and at this point when the game is still at its early release stages they decided to restrain the engine by default in drawing too much CPU power so the smaller and slower CPU’s don’t get overwhelmed

Citiraj:
...which suggests that the game or the engine itself clearly doesn’t use all the CPU power it has at its disposal. This is not directly connected with Intel’s Hyperthreading since we saw the i3 (which has HT) doing remarkably well. This is one of the rare situations (if not the only one) that we have seen in gaming where having a stronger CPU doesn’t really help, heck, its quite the opposite.
Citiraj:
It would be nice from DICE to fix this optimization issue (after they fix server crashing, net code, etc…) and you can be sure that we will inform DICE about our findings as soon as possible.
Drugim riječima test je zakuratz, slabiji procesori jači od veće braće te je aktualan za današnje BF4 MP perfomanse kao preklanjski snijeg. Isto tako piše da je igra u tom stanju imala problema sa w7, kao i određeni problemi sa gpu driverima, ali to je druga tema...

-->
Misterij razriješen
Normalno da postoji caka, jer je općepoznato da i3 ne može imati takve perfomanse u toj igri zbog ogromnog coreloada, pogotovo sa takvim grafama. Trebalo je samo pročitati što piše u teksu troubleovog linka, a ne samo gledati grafove. Radi se o prvoj verziji nakon bete sa limitiranim cpu perfomansama:

Citiraj:
DICE wasn’t lying when they said that optimization for the FX 6300 and FX 4300 will be finished by launch. The FX 6300 an FX 4300 perform excellently, from a 50%-500% performance increase compared to the Beta. Optimization for the FX 6300 was so good that it even out performs the FX 8350. One more surprise came from the i3 which performs as well as AMD CPU’s which have much more cores.
Citiraj:
But we also notice that the i7 4770k still under performs compared to the i5 4670k. The i3 4340 even performs similarly to the i7 which should not be the case by any means
Citiraj:
When you look at benchmarks from BETA you will see that the difference is so big that is ridiculous. Better optimization paired with better drivers gives at least 50% more performance. With AMD’s FX CPU the gains are even much bigger , but if you switch to Win 8.1 you get an even higher 20% performance increase
Citiraj:
The i7 and FX 8350 continue to under perform where the i7 trails in W7 but manages to catch up with the i5 4670k under Windows 8.1. The FX 6300 still has the same performance as the FX 8350 and sometimes even better. The i3 plays out phenomenally.
Citiraj:
The i7 continues to trail behind the i5 and i3 even on W7 but manages to catch up again on Windows 8.1. This is an optimization issue since you can see that FX 8350 also trails behind the FX 6300 and only manages to be on par with it on Windows 8.1
Citiraj:
As we continue we see again that the i3 and i5 beat the i7 as well as the FX 6300 beating the FX 8350. We concluded that this is an optimization issue
Citiraj:
To state the obvious, the i7 and FX 8350 are again trailing on Windows 7 and only manage to catch up on Windows 8 with the slower CPU’s.
Citiraj:
And yet again the i7 and FX 8350 don’t do as good as they should, managing to give somewhat expected performance with Windows 8.1.
Citiraj:
The i3 again performs excellently and this CPU is one of the biggest surprises of this benchmark where at most times performed as well as the i7 or maybe even better. The FX 8350 again is under performing compared to the FX 6300.

Citiraj:
Game optimization- as we saw at this point in time it doesn’t really matter which CPU you have. The game is optimized to fully utilize only CPU’s with 4 cores or threads

Citiraj:
We believe that DICE is having trouble taming the beast called Frostbit Engine 3.0 and at this point when the game is still at its early release stages they decided to restrain the engine by default in drawing too much CPU power so the smaller and slower CPU’s don’t get overwhelmed

Citiraj:
...which suggests that the game or the engine itself clearly doesn’t use all the CPU power it has at its disposal. This is not directly connected with Intel’s Hyperthreading since we saw the i3 (which has HT) doing remarkably well. This is one of the rare situations (if not the only one) that we have seen in gaming where having a stronger CPU doesn’t really help, heck, its quite the opposite.
Citiraj:
It would be nice from DICE to fix this optimization issue (after they fix server crashing, net code, etc…) and you can be sure that we will inform DICE about our findings as soon as possible.
Drugim riječima test je zakuratz, slabiji procesori jači od veće braće te je aktualan za današnje BF4 MP perfomanse kao preklanjski snijeg. Isto tako piše da je igra u tom stanju imala problema sa w7, kao i određeni problemi sa gpu driverima, ali to je druga tema...


Zadnje izmijenjeno od: Manuel Calavera. 21.10.2015. u 11:50.
Manuel Calavera je offline   Reply With Quote