Citiraj:
Autor Garro
Nego, 290X šamara 780? Zanimljivo, imao sam dojam da su to dosta izjednačene grafe, 780 nešto bolja u nižim rezama, 290x bolja u rezi 1440p i višima. Imaš neke brojke?
|
Sapphire R9 290 TRI-X 4GB OC & R9 290 Crossfire testovi
Osim što je R9 290 (non X) bila u prosjeku podjednaka na 1080p, a malo jača iznad 1080p - dobar dio vremena je bila i po 1000kn jeftinija od gtx 780. Onda su još nekako i podjednake bile, u novim igrama se 290 u zadnjih godinu dana samo dodatno odlijepila od 780, čak ponegdje i od 780Ti. Evo još naslova osim witchera 3,
Far Cry 4,
DA:I,
Battlefield: Hardline,
Dying Light (u zadnje 2 je "samo" 290X jača od 780Ti). Mislim da ne moram napominjati koliko je tisuća kn 780Ti bila skuplja od R9 290
290 i 290X su još bolje iznad 1080p, jako dobro stoje i naspram novije generacije 970 i 980, pogotovo ovim vram hog igrama. Evo veoma detaljni i stručni testovi uglednih siteova:
http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphic...rdor-2560x1440
1440p:
Citiraj:
|
The R9 290X averages about 65 FPS in our testing while the new GTX 980 pulls in 63 FPS or so; the R9 290 runs at 60 FPS while the GTX 970 only hits 55 FPS. That GTX 970 gap against the R9 290 is the biggest we have seen at 2560x1440 at 9%.
|
4K:
Citiraj:
|
Okay, let’s crank up the resolution and see what gamers will find if they have invested in a 4K monitor or plan to in the near future. Again, your frame rates are going to dip into the 35-45 FPS range but we actually found that the AMD Radeon cards had a better performance. The R9 290X holds a 10% advantage over the GTX 980 (44 FPS vs. 40 FPS) and the R9 290 has a larger 14% advantage over the GTX 970 (40 FPS vs. 35 FPS).
|
Citiraj:
|
Our 4K testing shows another story with more significant performance leads for the R9 290X (10%) and the R9 290 (14%) over the competing NVIDIA GPUs.
|
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...-tested-2.html