[Manuel Calavera]

Autor MAGARAC

GTX 970 je vise brza od gtx 770 nego kaj mislis. Mislim da tu ima prostora za grafu koja bi bila best buy. Ovo 128bit i sl. tesko da bu to.

Ne, pa znam da je dosta jača - al kažem kad bi gtx 960 bila onako jaka (kao 770 ili mrvu jača) kako se mislilo i koštala 200 dolara kao što se spominje u linku (kod nas naravno 30% više) 50-75% manje od gtx 970 wtf. Možda onda i gtx 970 ide dole cijenom kad dođe gtx 960, a sigurno ide kad amd izbaci svoje.

Da ima lufta za gtx 960Ti - slažem se, al treba prvo vidjeti za gtx 960 što je istina

Autor Dottore

Ne vjerujem, prije bi mrvicu brža od 760-tke.

To je ona logika da je nova generacija "niže klase" u rangu +/- grafe više klase u staroj generaciji npr.

gtx 770~gtx 680
gtx 760~gtx 660Ti/670
gtx 970~gtx 780
gtx 980~gtx 780Ti

Ja sam cijelo vrijeme govorio da gtx 960 neće biti jaka kao što se ovdje nagađalo, al izgleda da bi i to moje moglo biti preoptimistično ako se ne nastavi ovaj "niz" gore (ako ne bude blizu gtx 770)

EDIT

Specs on the card, at present, are a bit of a muddle. Today’s report indicates that the chip will use a 128-bit memory bus, paired with a new GM206 GPU core and 2GB of RAM. Previous reports, however, had pointed to a larger chip, a 256-bit memory bus, and a 4GB memory buffer using a cut-down version of the same GM204 that powers the GTX 980 and 970.

I suspect there’s truth to both rumors. Right now, the GTX 970 sells for $329, with 1664 CUDA cores, an 8GB frame buffer, and a 256-bit memory bus. Nvidia could trim the die to create a GTX 960 (or 960 Ti) by disabling more cores, but the GTX 970 is already a fair bit smaller than the 980, with 13 SMMs enabled (1664 cores) as opposed to 16 (2048 cores) on the full chip. Given that Nvidia typically targets both the $180-$200 and the $250-$280 market with separate SKUs, it makes sense to assume that the company will introduce products to address both these segments. The question is, how will it hit them?

When we reviewed the GTX 750 Ti this past spring, we noted that while the card’s power efficiency and performance-per-watt was excellent, AMD ultimately had a stronger offering from its own hardware. The GTX 750 Ti’s 128-bit memory bus appeared to handicap it in 1080p gaming — there were several cases where the older GTX 650 Ti Boost was faster than the card that ostensibly replaced it.

This implies that the GTX 960, when it does launch, will either offer a larger L2 cache than the GTX 750 Ti, draw on faster memory (the GTX 750 Ti used 1350MHz GDDR5, but GDDR5 clocked at 1750MHz is available on the market), or will simply use a wider memory bus. A 2GB frame buffer, possibly with a 4GB OEM option, probably makes the most sense for the current space — though given the RAM requirements on next-gen games, Nvidia could plausibly push the envelope on this front a bit.

http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/19...960-in-january