Istaknuo sam bitno , koga zanimaju pojedinosti neka detaljnije pročita i pogleda linkove.
Evo i završnog, Lucky no. 7
Mouse Guide 2.0 iz 4 mjeseca 2014. godine isto stavlja na listu Optičke miševe ... Pitam se zašto 
https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=56240.0
 ...Idem spavat 3 i 15 je 
When it comes to the sensor being able to track well on a surface, there are differences between the two, but one is not strictly better than the other. Laser sensors track better on some surfaces (like glass) while optical sensors track better on others (typically, cloth mousepads). Where the laser sensors lose out to the optical sensors is when it comes to accuracy and reliability. While the newer laser sensors manage to avoid prediction, the popular Avago laser sensors (9500, 9800) found in many modern mice all suffer from acceleration issues. Furthermore, while these sensor have a very high malfunction speed, their maximum perfect tracking speed is actually lower than that of the typical optical sensor. Another frequently used laser sensor, the Philips twin eye sensor, uses a different method to register mouse-movement. It actually does not have any acceleration issues, but introduces a problem when lifting the mouse, commonly referred to as a z-axis problem. The cursor moves when the mouse is lifted, which creates a problem for people who lift the mouse frequently with the intention of having the sensor stop its tracking. -->
@ bor1s ... Nisam sve stigao kad bi. Pročitao sam večinu najbitnijeg.
Godina testiranja ne mijenja činjenicu kako funkcionira koji hardver- senzor funkicionira - očitava detalje na podlozi i pomak na istoj.
Suma sumarum svega toga je upravo suština, a ona je uvijek osnovni princip na koji način neka tehnologija radi.
Tema je preciznosti u radu s mišem prilikom pomicanja i očitavanje tog pomaka što preciznije.
Pokretač teme nije znao za specfičnosti prilikom testiranja i suštinu tehnologije kao ni ti.
Pogledaj linkove što sam dao od početka, a ne samo one djelove koji te bodu u oči.
Smijala se sova sjenici, podizaču teme i meni.
Mislim da sam shvatio suštinu i uvidio drvo umjesto šume (podataka).
Od 6 linkova što sam dao, ti si zapeo samo za 1 iz davne 2007 godine koji je čudnog li čuda čak i točan.
Da se ne izgubi preglednost stavio sam svih 6 linkova u gumbić.
Istaknuo sam bitno , koga zanimaju pojedinosti neka detaljnije pročita i pogleda linkove.
Evo i završnog, Lucky no. 7
Mouse Guide 2.0 iz 4 mjeseca 2014. godine isto stavlja na listu Optičke miševe ... Pitam se zašto
https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=56240.0
...Idem spavat 3 i 15 je
When it comes to the sensor being able to track well on a surface, there are differences between the two, but one is not strictly better than the other. Laser sensors track better on some surfaces (like glass) while optical sensors track better on others (typically, cloth mousepads). Where the laser sensors lose out to the optical sensors is when it comes to accuracy and reliability. While the newer laser sensors manage to avoid prediction, the popular Avago laser sensors (9500, 9800) found in many modern mice all suffer from acceleration issues. Furthermore, while these sensor have a very high malfunction speed, their maximum perfect tracking speed is actually lower than that of the typical optical sensor. Another frequently used laser sensor, the Philips twin eye sensor, uses a different method to register mouse-movement. It actually does not have any acceleration issues, but introduces a problem when lifting the mouse, commonly referred to as a z-axis problem. The cursor moves when the mouse is lifted, which creates a problem for people who lift the mouse frequently with the intention of having the sensor stop its tracking.
Zadnje izmijenjeno od: Blue Spirit. 26.12.2014. u 03:18.
|