A ja ti kazem da stoji ta cinjenica... i sta sad... ja cu svoje tupiti ti svoje...zato takve rasprave nemaju smisla i zato su "zabranjene" pravilima foruma i mojim pravilima na podforumu konfiguracije.
"The good is quite easy to spot. The Athlon 64 3200+ and Athlon 64 FX 51 should be considered AMD engineering marvels. Kudos to the engineers at AMD for their hard work on the K8 core; they certainly deserve it. Without a doubt, AMD R&D did their homework and has delivered an architecture that is simply superior to Intel's when you consider clock-for-clock computing. Beyond that, you have to be a bit more selective in your statements. On the business application front and content creation programs, the Athlon 64 3200+ (paired with the right mainboard) and the Athlon 64 FX 51 were simply dominant in the industry standard benchmarks. Hyperthreading on the Pentium 4 should still be considered a real-world benefit, and we will simply have to look further into that at a later date. On the gaming front, the Athlon 64 family showed that they were not to be toyed with in the newer benchmarks, while the older engines still seem to favor the Pentium 4 a bit. Overall, even the midstream Athlon 64 3200+ seemed well suited to handle the Intel competition."
Nije mi se dalo traziti pa sam iskopao ove starije sa AMD 64 na sck 754
Benchmarci:
Lame 3.93WAV->MP3 Encoding (128kbps) (manje je bolje)
1.Pentium 4 3,2 191
2.AMD64 3200+ sck754 198
DivX5.05VOB-MPEG4 Flask Encoding (manje je bolje):
1.P4 3,2 291
2.AMD 64 3200+ sck754 330
3DMark 2001:
1.AMD 64 3200+ sck754 18656
2.P4 3,2 16959
Unreal Tournament 2003
1. AMD 64 3200+ sck 754 82,07fps
2. P4 3,2 64,83
Evo link i citat sa jednog drukcijeg testa:
"First, when you look at my benchmarking results above, you'll see that the Pentium 4 only had two strong suits, it can encode video and it can run certain workstation graphics applications. Whether Intel processors for your Linux box makes sense, will depend on what percentage of the time you do either of these tasks. For the majority of people that say they do more of the other tasks presented here, Athlon 64 processors are really your only options. The Pentium 4 in most applications just does not have enough performance versus the competition. If you look at value, AMD gives you more performance, at the same price point, in more applications. It will also be easier to cool it using less expensive cooling methods and save you on energy costs"
Link