25.08.2005., 07:39
|
#3
|
Premium
Datum registracije: Nov 2001
Lokacija: Zagreb
Postovi: 1,606
|
Citiraj:
Originally posted by tor
Hm, rađe da su ubacili još jedan x1 PCIe utor.
|
A gdje bi onda stavio samo jednu grafičku?
Citiraj:
MSI je to najbolje rješio, putem BIOS-a (Digital SLI Switch) bez ikakvih jumpera/dumpera i sličnih sranja...
|
Kažu da to "limitira" overclocking....
Citiraj:
Other manufacturers like Asus have recently brought out SLI boards that use more expensive auto-switching technology where SLI can be turned on or off in BIOS. The advantage is mechanical simplicity, but the disadvantage is that overclocking performance may be compromised with a smaller range of overclocking than the more commonly used paddles and jumpers.
|
Citiraj:
Jetway does not need a paddle card, or jumpers, or switches in this arrangement. The design is simplicity in itself. What's more, this board theoretically could be a better performer without the paddle, jumpers or switches that can limit overclocking performance.
|
Citiraj:
This brings us back to the earlier question of whether or not the dedicated slots with no paddles, jumpers, or switches might improve performance. It is clear that the Jetway performs very well in overclocking, and if this design is the reason, then others should copy the Jetway design.
|
|
|
|