Navodno programi dolaze sa izmijenjenom EULO-m u kojoj piše da je OK koristiti softver koji je "nabavljen" od strane Adobea. Kako mogu biti ilegalni ako je u uvjetima korištenja navedeno da je legalno koristiti ih ako su nabavljeni direktno od strane Adobea, direktno sa njihovih servera.
Kao i kod svakog ugovora, poštivaju se uvjeti koji su napisani u ugovoru prilikom sklapanja, a kod softvera se taj isti ugovor potpisuje klikom na gumb "I accept" kod instalacije. Mogu oni sad izvoditi umne akrobacije koje oće, ali u trenutku preuzimanja programa sa njihovih servera vrijedili su uvjeti navedeni u EULI.
Kako bi Rojs rekao, "tko je jamio, jamio je"
Citiraj:
|
The download page is deliberately open to anyone who signs up for an Adobe ID (which if you agree gives them an opportunity to include you in email shots). On the download page they give a serial number for each product and that serial number is the same for everyone. When you install the products the licence says that the product can be used by anyone who has "obtained" it from Adobe (they deliberately don't use the words bought or purchased). It would be a highly technical breach of the licence if someone put the files up for download other than from the Adobe site because then you wouldn't be obtaining it from Adobe.
|
Citiraj:
|
Making the files publically available on their servers, but then expecting "unauthorised" people not to download them, was somewhat naive, especically when the files were accompanied by a licence agreement which did not make the downloading and use of the files illegal. To regularise the legal situation, the licence needs to change the word "obtain" to "purchase". But for those who have already downloaded the files, you can't retrospecitively change the licence.
|