Moderator
Datum registracije: Apr 2005
Lokacija: Vancouver, BC // Zabreg, Maximir
Postovi: 12,424
|
Citiraj:
Autor Romano.Cule
Pa nisam ja napravio qoute na engleskom da ispadne impresivnije ?! Stavio sam link na clanak u kojem je navedeni quote naveden kao zakljucak recenzije. A ovo sto je zwer napisao kao misljenje na nekoj sajtu je cista pizdarije :P Priznaj da si to sad izmislio,jer tko god je to napisao ocigledno je da nema pojma. Asrock je low end tier proizvodjac koji puno daje za malu kvalitetu. Znaci dobit cete puno djidja miđa,ali nije to to, znate :=)
|
Gle svatko ima pravo na svoje mišljenje. No ASRock već dugo vremena nije low-end brand. Od 2008. godine je prestao biti samo low-end brand kada se odvojio od Asusa. A u ASRocku sad radi ekipa koja je ranije radila u Abitu.
Također ne čemu tako teške izjave, po čemu misliš da imaš pravo reći da netko nema pojma?
Koliko si njihovih novih ploča osobno isprobao u zadnje 3 godine?
Pogledaj malo recenzije ploča i vidjet ćeš da ne zaostaju za ostatkom ekipe.
1,
Citiraj:
The ASRock Z68 Extreme7 Gen3 is a gorgeous motherboard, and although its benchmark scores were mostly average, it’s one of only two boards in this roundup that supports quad SLI/CrossFireX. Additionally, it has easy-to-use yet powerful overclocking features, so you can infer that this motherboard’s performance can scale up rather well if you're the type to push the envelope.
|
2,
Citiraj:
ASRock continues to improve quality and design. Performance was extremely comparable to the competition in our labs. In fact, the Extreme 4 is the only motherboard to give users the most unhindered connectivity simply from one additional PLX chip controller which makes sure the PCIE bus has room to stretch. Overclockers will be pleasantly surprised with their results. Some more polishing in the area of design, software, and BIOS would really solidify ASRock’s position among the DIY users as well as system integrators and enthusiasts. Users don’t like to see “trial software” and we’re hoping that ASRock discontinues putting it in the box or just offering the real deal. At $184.99 USD, the ASRock Z68 Extreme 4 offers all of the important features consumers want in a high performance, fully functional platform. For that reason, we’re giving it our Editors’ Choice award in this gruelling round up.
|
3
Citiraj:
ASRock Z68 Extreme7 Gen3
ASRock had the best automatic overclock with our processors, achieving 4.6 GHz as if it was designed to push our sample, which came from Intel, as far as it'd go. That's actually a distinct possibility, depending on where ASRock got its own test samples. The problem with pre-defined overclocking profiles, though, is that they’re almost never optimized for any randomly-selected CPU because each CPU overclocks differently. While we’re pleased with how ASRock treats our specific processor, we can’t make any promises about how well these profiles will work with yours.
We also really like the fact that ASRock's Z68 Extreme7 Gen3 uses a 1.36 V maximum CPU core voltage, giving this Intel Core i7-2600K what our experience says is a safe, easy, and effective performance boost. That's everything we were looking for from this exercise.
|
4
Citiraj:
ASRock’s P67 Extreme4 had the highest memory overclock and second-best efficiency, while Gigabyte’s second-highest memory overclock and tied-for-second CPU overclock makes its P67A-UD4 a worthy adversary. Extra features tip the scale in ASRock’s favor, though not likely by a large enough margin for the firm to steal previous Gigabyte customers.
|
Na kraju razlike u performansama među pločama u pravilu ne postoje jer je sve većinom integrirano u CPU. Razlike su u izvedbi regulacije napona, opremljenosti, iako i tu u pravilu nema nekih velikih razlika. Većina njih koristi iste kontrolere, layout je vrlo sličan, izvedba hlađenja također.
5
Citiraj:
So far in the last quarter, we've covered six P67 motherboards from $160 to $210—the ASRock P67 Extreme4, the ASUS P8P67 Pro, the Gigabyte P67A-UD4, the MSI P67A-GD65, the ASRock P67 Extreme6 and the ECS P67H2-A2. There's not that much difference between them performance wise in terms of the gaming benchmarks, the CPU intensive benchmarks—the real deal is in the USB benchmarks, the amount of extras crammed in the box with the board, such as SATA cables and USB 3.0 holders, the overclock options and the extras on the board.
From today's boards, I really like the ASRock P67 Extreme6 for its ease of use, the USB 3.0 bracket and those 10 SATA ports, six of which are SATA 6 Gbps. The Auto OC options also seemed to work better than previously seen on the P67 Extreme4. The MSI P67A-GD65 has that OC Genie button which works well, even if it does have games in the UEFI which baffle me, and a software list from here to next Sunday. The ECS has its quirks, but it has the best fan speed system and software available—you just have to know what you're doing if you want a good overclock out of it.
If you had to buy a board, today, I'd suggest you decide which features are the most important. P67 motherboards are like Ford Transit vans: there's a model, size, speed, color, engine size and stereo system for almost everyone—just as long as you know what you want out of what is on offer!
|
__________________
''Of all the things I've lost I miss my mind the most''
Mark Twain
Intel Core i5 2520
8GB DDR3 Patriot
Intel HD3000
256GB LiteOn LMH-256V2M mSATA
NEC USB 3.0 ExpressCard
14" 1366x768
Windows 10 Pro x64
Asus P6T SE w/P6T WS Pro BIOS mod
Intel Xeon X5650 @ 4,0 GHz + TT Frio OCK
4x 2GB Mushkin SilverLine Stiletto 1600
Gigabyte GTX 560Ti
Kingston V300 120GB + 640GB WD AAKS + 1TB WD EARS + 2,5'' Hitachi 500GB
DVD-RW LiteOn SATA
Corsair HX520
TT Chaser MK-1
Philips 200WP7ES / LG 32LG6000 Scarlet
Samsung ML-2160 / CL I-Trigue 5600
Logitech MX3200
Windows 10 Pro x64
Intel DP67BG
Intel G1610
2x 2GB Kingston HyperX Limited Edition 1600 MHz
Hitachi 250GB
VTX3D HD6670
DVD-RW Asus SATA
FSP 350 PNF
CoolerMaster Cavalier
ViewSonic VX922
Win7 x64 SP1
Zadnje izmijenjeno od: Wolverine. 14.11.2011. u 22:37.
|