Nije stvar u prikazu uopće,nego u mogućnostima čipa,i operacijama.
http://www.gpureview.com/show_cards....=508&card2=544
Veći bandwidth,više rastera,gotovo duplo jači pixel fillrate,razlike ima ohoho.
Svi bi koristili moddane g92 kartice da nema razlike..opradanost investicije u Quadro i slične je neupitna,isplate se u pravilu u prvih godinu dana rada na njima,bar koliko sam razgovarao sa dizajnerima interijera.
http://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro_fx_5600_4600.html
Jedna košta 16000$ a 8800GT 129$,ali nisam toliko lud da izvalim da će druga raditi posao podjednako kao i prva.
Q: why not just soft mod Gts 250 to Quadro ??
A: I've looked for the steps to do this, but can't find any clear cut answers. I have the GTS 250 that I ordered for my work pc that is exclusively used for CAD. I am disappointed at the performance. I have been reading up on SoftQuadro, but can't find any detailed instructions as to softmod this thing. If you can point me in the right direction, I would be forever grateful.
A:Here is a link to direct instructions for Soft Modding. But you will have to find out what is the comparable quadro card to your card. I believe the GTS 250 is the 4800 as to what was mentioned earlier. I thought it was the 4700 but I am not certain.
link below
http://www.techarp.com/showarticle.aspx?artno=539
A:The problem with not getting a
real Quadro is you don't have the massive amount of professional support that you get with a Quadro card should something happen. Autodesk dosen't really support rendering on non Fire and Quadro cards, and if you call them they will tell you something along the lines of "your card is unsupported" because of accuracy issues.
The other problem with softmodding is that it sometimes dosen't work, or works with mixed results.
Finally, there is the fact that Quadros are Quadros because they are rock solid stable, due to a mixture of drivers and higher binned GPU's, which the GTS250 obviously dosen't have.
Old spice,dokaz - a ne obećanja :
http://www.techarp.com/showarticle.aspx?artno=539&pgno=9
Konačno čisti bullshit o jednakim performansama modova i čru Quadra može prestati. Tko se amaterski bavi 3D modeliranjem,nek ide na mod, a kao što je rečeno,kome je to kora kruha i svakodnevica, -60% slabije CATIA performanse,ili -56.5% slabiji 3DSMax rezultati govore sami za sebe.
Također,golema je razlika non-moda i modanih,ali treba napraviti jasnu distinkciju između performansi moda i true Quadra.Sve je na linku jasno i glasno prikazano.