24.06.2009., 00:24
|
#1353
|
Guest
Datum registracije: May 2006
Lokacija: Šibenik
Postovi: 648
|
Citiraj:
Autor thedream
What's interesting to note is that there's a 32 per cent performance gain over the Radeon HD 4870 1GB when looking at the 1,920x1,200 results, and between 50fps to 66fps that becomes significant.
http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=16508&page=6
http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=16508&page=8
Zanimljivo,clockana GTX260 216 :
Cranking it up some more from the base 576MHz/1,242/1,998MHz clocks, we managed really push the card to decent levels, topping out at 704MHz core/1,414MHz shaders/2,450MHz memory. Seeing this, we wonder if the same base binning is used on EXO samples, too.
Looking back at the ET:QW test at 1,920x1,200 we see that card, at its shipping clocks, scored an average 75.93fps. When overclocked this rose to an impressive 89.7 fps when overclocked, which is the kind of benchmark result a Radeon HD 4850 X2 returns.
|
Ovo samo dokazuje da je bolja u CoH. I sad se možemo prepucavati igrama do sutra...
Razlika je u 400kn, i to je neoboriv argument. Ako su otprilike podjednake, onda je lud onaj koji potroši 400kn više (ako sada kupuje novu, naravno). Može se kupiti S1+120mm i riješiti buka i temperature i još ostane u džepu.
Pomak od 4850 je oko 20% bez obzira na igru. S jedne na drugu se ne isplati, ali za sve ispod - ako vam treba više snage - ta kartica je po ovim cijenama no brainer.
|
|
|